ENERGY AMPLIFICATION

[leonelogb]

ok!!!!!    broke my promise again!!!


NO ONE PAID ME OKKKKKKKKKKKKKK!!!!!!!
SUPPOSE TO BE MY LAST IS LAST BUT !!!!!!!! THEY KEPT ON PROVOKING ME AND ATTACKING EVEN I AM RESTING, GOT IT?


GOD GAVE ME THIS MAYBE BECAUSE I KEPT ON DIGGING AND I'M DOING IT FOR MY FAMILY. GOT IT?
YOU MEAN TO SAY AFTER LOT OF DIGGING AND EXPERIMENT AND SPEND A LOT OF MONEY FOR THE RESEARCH JUST GIVE IT TO YOU JUST LIKE THAT ?
AFTER A LOT OF PEOPLE INSULTED AND PROVOKE ME? HUH. DO YOU GET IT MISTER?? [size=78%] [/size]


OF COURSE I WANT TO BRING MY FAMILY FIRST TO ENJOY MY DISCOVERY!!!!!!!!!!
YOU KNOW WHAT?, YOU WERE LUCKY BECAUSE EVEN THOUGH THEY DO THAT, I STILL GIVE HERE SOMETHING TO THINK FOR EVERYONE TO DIG MORE.


UNNNNNDDDDERSSSSTTTTTAND!!!!!!!!!!


OK LET ME HELP AGAIN BEFORE I GOT IT  I'M WATCHING THIS TESLA INTERVIEW, AT TIME 4:50 TESLA TALK ABOUT BLACKHOLE.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=olHsobVItrs
AND FROM THERE I DIG AGAIN AND AGAIN  MY RESTLESS BRAIN ALWAYS WANT ME TO READ AND WATCH MORE AND MORE.
COMBINING EVERYTHING IN MY HEAD. I AM ACTUALLY IN MY THINKING CHAIR WHEN I GOT IT, VERY FUNNY, THEY THOUGHT I'M CRAZY BECAUSE I SHOUTED A VERY LOUD AND LOUGH
THEN I WATCH THIS TOM BEARDEN INTERVIEW. YOU LISTEN IN SCALAR POTENTIAL  DISCUSSION AND TRY TO UNDERSTAND IT OK.
AT TIME 9:48
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hJY8XqFnAyg
HURRYUP YOU SAVE THESE VIDEOS, CAUSE THEY ARE TRUTH.


WE DON'T NECESSARY NEED A VERY HIGH VOLTAGE OK. 


THE DISTURBANCE PRODUCE VOLTAGE BY THE MAGNIFYING TRANSMITTER IS VERY SMALL WHEN WE RECEIVED IT OK? BUT OUR RECEIVER MUST BE DIFFERENT, AND THAT RECEIVER DESIGN WAS HIDE BY TESLA CAUSE ITS VERY SIMPLE AND TRICKY HEHE.




SO LOOOOOOOOONG EVERYONE KEEP DIGGING BE CAREFULL


BYE NOW


GOD BLESS
NOICARO L. OTIT 


HERE IS YOUR BONUS
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=95Cnp0wfQsY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iPyUtHtmJMQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2lSMl-ffcog
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DB18NJrMQU








[size=78%]
[/size]
[size=78%] [/size]

I'm happy that you're back 
In your absence, I had to follow by own, and I have learning too, but just a little bit
but always thankful of God, because He is good! 

Thank you too!!!

[forest]

Again we stop talking about the solution and this thread again become useless....

[NickZ]

   And you can't even buy it, (the solution)... off of the Philipino guy,  cuz it ain't  "For Sale".
   If you wait... long enough.  You'll be able to buy whatever we need to generate our own "Juice".
But, a solid state "solution" would be best, with no moving parts. NO noise, smog, or nuclear radiation(s).
   None of us, with few exceptions, know how to do it, much less to make something like that, for real.And maybe that's why we are here, listening, learning, and building some circuits up.
 
   Tito: Thanks for the tips, and reminder. And I hope that someday you will get paid, OK...
                                             
    Pura Vida, from  Costa Rica.                                                 NickZ

[Magluvin]

 Lets say we have a 1 to 1 ratio transformer. In reference we will say 100 turns pri and 100 turns sec. Now on the primary we will for this discussion have taps at every 25 turns.  Five wires out to apply input.  Also, we can separate the 100 windings electrically at each tap. 
If we apply 100vac(no specifics as to the freq and such, just working with Vin vs Vout. What ever freq works well with the particular transformer we make) to the pri input terminals 1 and 5(100turns), we should read 100v on the sec. Correct?

Now if we make a separation at tap 3 of the primary (lets label them 3a and 3b when separated) and apply an input of 50vac across pri terminals 1 and 3a(50turns. turns 1 thru 50 tap 3a) for a literal 50/100 ratio, we should still have 100vac out on the sec. Correct?

Ok. Now we take tap 1 of the pri and connect it to the tap 3b connection that is on the windings that were separated from turns 1 thru 50 at the tap 3 separation point, and we connect the tap 3a to tap 5.  Here we will have put the 2 separate windings 1 to 50 in parallel with windings 51 to 100. what would the VAC on the sec be if we apply 50vac to the parallel primary windings??? If 1 winding 1-50 has 50vac across it and winding 51-100 has 50vac across it, would that be different than 100vac across tap 1 and 5 where tap 3a and 3b are connected as in the first test above?

Now we have 2 isolated sets of pri windings but disconnected from each other at tap 3. So tap 1 and tap 3a are turns 1-50, and tap 3b and tap 5 atr turns 51 to 100 and we apply 2 isolated inependent 50vac inputs(both in phase with eachother), 1 to each winding for 50vac across 1-3a and the other across 3b-5. What would the sec voltage be now? Is it the same as just 100vac across the primary taps 1-5, 1-1 ratio because the taps 1-5 would read 100vac because the 2 independent supplies are virtualy in series?

Just cant get a grip on why the 2 windings in parallel, basically having 50vac across each in either situation would show any difference in output.

Thinking on a project that i need to fully understand this before i can continue. Got me to thinking on the e-field stuff as i can so far only come up with that as a reason. Not sure yet.  Depending on what responses I get on this, it may open up an idea to take advantage of a bifilar coil.  Lets see....


Mags

[Magluvin]

Simple version....
A transformer with 2 primary windings of 50 turns each and a secondary of 100 turns.
First we apply 50vac across just a isolated primary of 50 turns. Sec should have 100vac out
Second we connect the 2 primaries in series and apply 100vac to the primary of 100turns total. Sec should have 100vac out.
Third we put the 2 primary windings in parallel and apply 50vac in.  Now, if each primary winding had 50v across each winding, whether it is the 2 windings is series with 100vac applied, or 50vac across each paralleled winding, why would there be a difference in output for each test? 50vac across each primary winding in either case 'should' have the same currents through each winding, thus the same magnetic field result in each case. No???
I think this needs to be understood better. For me anyway. 

Mags