ENERGY AMPLIFICATION

[bringdownthezog]

For sure a high side switch will fit better to your needs on this subject, but again it depends on what you are trying to accomblish.

My personal opinion on Tom Bearden.
His transforrmer as a stand alone unit, will never give something more than a simple conventional transformer. As F6FLT said it needs energy to do parametric changes and this is really NOT "free" to do it. I am not saying that Bearden is a fraud. He just protects his work as any logical researcher who gave his arm and leg to discover something of a value. Don't seek his secret on his drawings or else you are doomed to repeat again and again the same and wrong approach to the subject. The same applies to all of the researchers the last 100 years who applied a patent for a "free" energy device. Their secret is never showed on papers or else everyone now would have a maschine of this kind. Experimenting with your own ideas and gaining personal experience is the only way out..

Regards

Dont back peddle Jeg. Words are not enough to discredit Bearden.  You have nothing on Bearden. Nought, nil, nada, nothing, zero, zilch and zip.

[forest]

High side switch is the only way for Tom Bearden method :-) which is I believe Titot original method which is what I'm working on.... ;-) In 2005 I found other method but was unable to progress because it require careful and precise experimenting with HV and I was not experienced to do so and still have no tools. It's a matter to skin the cat - various methods exists to skin the ether ;-)

[Tito L. Oracion]

By just easily saying tom bearden's meg won't work.
My friend you are not thinking
You think his 30 years research just give it to you as simple as that! ?
Of course there is a small part there he is not disscussing to the audience. Got it?
The keys are "plenum, vacuum ,doping,  dipole"

[ayeaye]

« The elite minds discuss ideas, average minds discuss events, the mediocre minds discuss people. »

I'm sorry but, the people here refuse to take your ideas instead of experiments. Maybe they did if you did belong to the category of elite minds, which you evidently think you are, but unfortunately you are very far from it, and evidently are not capable of analytical thinking, which certainly doesn't enable you to be an elite mind and come up with any valuable ideas.

My advice to you, good advice, believe me, is to learn rhetoric. Did you ever do that, do you even know what it is? Once they taught it in schools, for thousands of years, in ancient Greece and even long before. Not any more, as they don't want people to learn to think. This may teach you analytical thinking, why not to learn what you don't know?

You show your laboratory as if it proves your very high level or something. You have great tools, but you yourself are not great. I have only an old analog oscilloscope. But what's the use of your laboratory as you don't use it? This here is not the first time when you replaced experiments with your ideas and arbitrary conclusions. With my experiment too, you just found that LTspice has a bifilar coil model, talked about like you made a discovery in science. Without critically analyzing it at all, which you evidently cannot as you lack critical thinking.

There are many kind of bifilar coil models, some are just two coupled coils with a capacitor between the terminals of two coils. Which i suspect the LTspice model is, unless shown that it is anything more sophisticated. Capacitor between terminals of the coils is *not* the same as capacitor connecting the middles of the coils, not to talk many such capacitors. Not to talk that when researching overunity, we are after effects that the conventional equations may not include, an example if you like was the Marinov generator. But you wrote some arbitrary musings based on casually trying the LTSpice bifilar coil model, and replaced them for experiments, you didn't do experiments.

Thus evidently even the most expensive laboratory equipment is useless when it is used by a person with a poor mental capability who also lacks scientific rigor.

[F6FLT]

Not MEG. This is just piss pond. 

I am very impressed by your argument. Obviously, Maxwell is wrong. I haven't seen such a solid theory since the Hollow Earth theory.