ENERGY AMPLIFICATION

[Jeg]

...see the photo of a part of my modest laboratory today, yes it is a mess, I don't have time to clean up. 

I find it very clean and organized. Well done.

[Jeg]

Words are not enough to discredit Bearden.  You have nothing on Bearden.

It would be nice if you read more carefully my post. 
As i said Bearden has his secret very well protected. If you think that by his transformer alone you are going to make a "free" energy maschine then please...the stage is yours!

[forest]

Forget MEG, look at Bearden Final Secret of Free energy

[F6FLT]

...
I'm curious to know if you have ever considered the TPU by Steven Marks?

Pm

You are right that the TPU can be linked to our discussion on (pseudo) flux switching/modulation.
I considered it but did not test it for two reasons:
- competent people have tested it and failed.
- the explanations associated with its principle are inconsistent and do not include any new ideas.

Even if there was something behind it, which is unlikely, random experimentation without a guiding idea is futile.

Generally speaking, if after 2 or 3 years no one has noticed any particular effect, it is because there is none.
It is then time for scammers of free energy to make a buzz with lectures and books on the"secrets" of these kinds of device that they have never built and for which they invent crazy principles. Their goal is to make money with the naive or to draw attention to their egocentric person in need of recognition. And it works! The number of gullible people attracted by the word "secret" and who believe that they will become initiated into an open secret defying the laws of physics, it is amazing. 

[partzman]

Hi Partzman,

I don't like math but Gorchilin's equations are not too hard.
The voltage at the inductance terminals is usually noted (1) UL=-L.dI(t)/dt when L is constant.
Here Gorchilin considers that L depends on I, so he writes :
UL=L(I) It    "It" with a dot above  means the time derivative dI/dt, and t an index because I is time dependent, so we retrieve the right equation (1) with L depending on I, in occidental notation:  UL=L(i).dI(t)/dt  (Gorchilin doesn't care the sign which normally is negative. I suppose that he want to calculate the energy which is proportionnal to UL² so the sign would not be important).

But when L is not constant, equation (1) is false. We can't just replace L by L(I). When L is not constant and depends on I which depends on t, then L depends also on t and we have :
UL=d(LI)/dt = L(t).dI(t)/dt + I(t).dL(t)/dt  (see here)

Gorchilin makes the same mistake with the capacitor, using a voltage dependent capacitor C(U) so he writes UC=C(U)dU(t)/dt, instead of :
UC=d(CU)/dt = C(t)dU/dt + U(t)dC/dt

However I'm not totally sure that his method couldn't fit the traditional method, I think he's wrong but it's to be verified, but not necessary because there is a much obvious error after that.

He has an integral on U for the capacitor, an integral on I for the inductance, and an integral on t for the resistor.
Now the worst : he sums the three energy integrals as they were independent, instead of summing first (UC+UL+UR)I(t) so that the sign of UL becomes critical, and integrating on t after, to get the total energy and compare it to the integral of U(t)I(t) of the generator. So I'm not surprised he can find OU!

Hi F6FLT,

Thank you for taking the time to give your analysis of Gorchilin's math on his parametric inductance theory!  You have saved myself and I'm sure others from unnecessary build time which would have proven fruitless.

Pm