The author of confusion: North/South Poles and Polarity

[gravityblock]

Thanks rangerover for the illustrations.  I have seen that proposed before and wonder why it is rarely mentioned, because it doesn't seem out of the realm for being a possibility.

Here's another diagram of the magnetic field.  Hopefully we can get a good discussion going.

[onthecuttingedge2005]

Thanks rangerover for the illustrations.  I have seen that proposed before and wonder why it is rarely mentioned, because it doesn't seem out of the realm for being a possibility.

Here's another diagram of the magnetic field.  Hopefully we can get a good discussion going.

Hi GB.

I like your saying.
Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again, and expecting a different result.

it's kinda of cool.

Jerry

[rangerover444]

  Thanks GB for the drawing and not automatically rejecting my proposed
magnetic circulation idea.

Before I will comment on your drawing, let me explain a few principles about
magnetism as a results of tests I’ve done over the past 3 years or so.

First of all in order to create a motion of particles we need a motive for that,
otherwise they will go to sleep…..lol.  Now, we already know that magnets are
attracting and repelling, and also moving. So we can assume (to start with), that
their motion have something to do with their natural inherited ability to attract
or repel. That bring us to further thoughts, that in order for them to move, we
need two kinds of them, since one particle with one pole at each end, could never
decide on it’s identity and hesitate what to do……lol

Therefore we need two of them - complementary opposites, in order to move.
Now if they will move mostly by repelling - they will not have a direction, since
Repelling knows how to direct away and not to aim on a specific direction…
So in order to move they need attraction, and attraction could happen between
the two opposite types - one North pole individual magnets and the other South
pole individual magnets.  They can be also “repel from behind” by the same type
Of magnets.

But here comes another issue :  If their motion is driven by attraction (in front)
And repletion (from behind), why they do not “stick” to the first opposite they
Find ? And stay with it forever, not even going out to movies….lol
Well, let’s put it this way, they are happy to meet their opposite complementary
Particle, but there is a long line of them, or call it a stream of them coming towards
Our particle.  And behind it, there is also a long line of the same kind particle that
Are eager to meet their opposite ones, say hello and move on to the next.

So in this case we have two streams of particles going in the opposite directions
that are “fast dating” their mates and moving on. Here comes another trick that
Facilitate their interchanging places - spiraling, they are moving in a right hand
Screw like twist. That helps them to keep their trajectory in straight lines (even
When they are in orbit, this spiraling keeps them in stable orbit), and another
Reason is that each stream can “fit” exactly into the stream that runs in the
Opposite direction.

If you want to visualize it, think about two chain links that are “wrapping”
Around each other while “climbing” over each other, in a right hand twisted motion.

Well, sorry for the long description, I guess we will talk about your drawing
In the next post.

Hope it helped.

Cheers.
     

[rangerover444]

  And to make one more point clear about electricity and magnetism :
During 1800-1900 Farady, Gauss, Lorenz, Maxwell and others where fascinated by
their new discoveries of new energy. We cannot understand it now since it’s
too obvious to us, but at that time it was like discovering America for
the second time : Humanity is going into a new prosperity due to this discovery !!!
And gradually from “naïve Faraday” it turns from a research of nature into
a research for technology…..  Maxwell equations are still being used today for
all kind of applications !!!

So at one point it all become "science in the name of energy and technology".
And that was when Maxwell determined that there are no such a thing as Magnetic
Monopole - that was the final nail in the “Magnetic coffin”. Since then, magnets
Were “put aside” for their “younger brothers the electrons, photons, protons, neutrons"
and many others, which HAD TO BE INVENTED in order to accommodate the
magnetic phenomena which could not be explained without new particles that
in fact does not exists but used as “Fillers” where no other explanation could be found.

  Just look at the electric theory and see how many manipulation were done in order for
the electrons to carry this energy ?  See what the photons needs to be done in order
“to be at the base of light and all the electromagnetic waves” ?   See how the Atom’s
components (30 of them discovered so far !!!) are suppose to build up one atom, and
how many manipulation where done in order to explain the observations on the
atoms and the different “elements periodic table” ?

Sorry if it sound that harsh, after all I have no complain to anyone, since it‘s really not
my life and everyone make his/her choices in life, so it’s their right to do so, and who
Am I to say something about it.   But looking at all this from the side, looking at the
tendency to make nature look as complicated as possible - does not make sense to me.

I wish other people will realize it for themselves, and stop being led by things other
people told them that this how physics works….

Cheers.
     

[IotaYodi]

The dipole will always end up out of the enclosed surface thus making the flux zero. This makes sense because a magnetic dipole are not two particles like gravity block said. But they are more one entity. A magnetic dipole is thus misnamed and should be named magnetic moment to stop the confusion.

Thats what the string theory seems to dictate too. The dipole is one magnetic entity composed of 2 opposite strings bound to both poles by this theory. The strings may have a natural vibrational frequency being induced externally by the aether itself. Different vibrational frequency's applied to the string may change the tension to a plus or minus.  Ed L. thought it was with 2 dipoles with a neutral force to balance it which makes sense. All this reminds me of Sweets work with cold electricity and the magnetic field being tuned to the earth. Just like teluric currents in earth batterys. The power of cold currents is already evident.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=evfUTmx0uh8