My Current Build

[BAHammer]

Alan hows things?.

what i would like to know is, if you have figured besslers wheel out how can you patent it if its already been published in his books?.

just curious mate.

Chad.

  Chad,
The reality is, unless the builder of a wheel can "sell" it as a Bessler wheel, a patent can be given.
Even Bessler's drawings might be able to receive a patent because his drawings do not explain how they work. Explaining the method in which something works is required. it is possible to have two like items that work differently. And yet, the general description is the same.
With Bessler, weights working in pairs is to vague. It does not specify which weights.
In a flywheel for a generator circa 1900, they used weights working in pairs. This example would demonstrate that unless a specific relationship is made in how weights work in pairs, then at best, it is an ambiguous description.

[AB Hammer]

You have no idea what I'm investigating and building.

The facts attack you.  I just point them out.

The fact is you want to make the point of Jim being banned yet you're of the same caliber of others that have been banned.  They were termed "frauds" but you want to term your self "optimistic".  A pile of alan by any other name smells the same.

My better 1/2 is going over an ethics CPE and they just made the point, "make the rules the same for everyone."  This is what's taught in professional environments and certainly not what's practiced in some forums.

I have a theory.  If you can suck the chrome off a bumper hitch you get a pass.  lol




Bessler007
Cmdr, MIB

The Inquisitor-Bessler007
You talk about ethics? FDROLMAO
With every post you attack, you prove yourself spewing bile that you are the scum of the earth.
You go to places that have banned you, under other names and you call others fraud?
You are a cowered! you hide behind handles, and won't stand as yourself but only under fiction?

You asked
>>If you can suck the chrome off a bumper hitch you get a pass.<<  I wouldn't know. Is this how you go through life?
___________________________________________

Chad

What BAHammer/Jim said, is what is known as the gray area. If there is a design/drawing that has been in public domain. You will have to fight and if you can show enough differences then it might pass. I will not try to sell a wheel as a Bessler Wheel. It would be a big red flag before you even get started. Otherwise I agree with what Jim said here

>> With Bessler, weights working in pairs is to vague. It does not specify which weights.
In a flywheel for a generator circa 1900, they used weights working in pairs. This example would demonstrate that unless a specific relationship is made in how weights work in pairs, then at best, it is an ambiguous description.<<

[Bessler007]

A few Alan Bauloree quotes:

Why would I want something that was designed by somebody else? especially what you have come up with. You are not in the same class as I, when it comes to design.

So Jim! any more BULL $#!+? Or you understand you have been making mistakes and swallow a little pride so things might get better.

You are so lost, and have no idea but your imagination.

here is no lies from me. The only lies are your accusations.

For starters how can he know what I am working on? Even if he hacked my computer he would never know what I am working on ( I don't keep it in the computer, only what I download to look at later). Does he have video cameras hidden in my house or shop?  Insanity is the only view left for this.

When it comes to that toy, you are delusional for I was and have always talked about something else.

I defend with the one exception of the toy you posted and I said "Why would you bring back that peace of crap back". I was already severely tired of it and you won't let it go, tunnel visioned one.

You are talking like a $#!+ salesman with a mouth full of samples

.

You attack Jim like you have yet don't expect to be treated likewise?


You are full of alan and crap; but I repeat myself.




Bessler007
Cmdr, MIB

edit:  The truth attacks you, I don't.  I simply point out you're a liar.
Want one that works? 

[BAHammer]

A few Alan Bauloree quotes:
.

You attack Jim like you have yet don't expect to be treated likewise?


You are full of alan and crap; but I repeat myself.




Bessler007
Cmdr, MIB

edit:  The truth attacks you, I don't.  I simply point out you're a liar.
Want one that works? 

  Bessler,
ABHammer's credibility is based on different values. An example of this is, if his videos were peep shows, he'd be out of business. No thrill and not even a decent tease.
At least when i did post a video on a specific idea, I explained the idea in the video and showed the specific points I was discussing. This means I included audio and captions.
An example of this is when I had a video posted about using a round slot and that at a specific point, the weight would roll in on it's own. This is something that if I built a wheel with 8 weights, I could demonstrate works on a working wheel. It's a mathematical principal I discovered. And I think everyone missed the point about the math   
One reason why I did not pursue it is because if it worked according to the math, it would be difficult for people not familiar with perpetual engineering to understand it. Of course, the fact that it would be able to rotate much faster would probably be what people would find most interesting.   
This is where my current build, if it works as math suggests it will, will be able to be used in such a way that anyone that is shown how it works would be able to understand it. I think this is something that would make it more interesting. Letting other people be able to say, ok, I get it.

p.s. AB Hammer might have reasons for no audio, but captions would still help to understand the point behind a video.

[AB Hammer]

  Bessler,
ABHammer's credibility is based on different values. An example of this is, if his videos were peep shows, he'd be out of business. No thrill and not even a decent tease.
At least when i did post a video on a specific idea, I explained the idea in the video and showed the specific points I was discussing. This means I included audio and captions.
An example of this is when I had a video posted about using a round slot and that at a specific point, the weight would roll in on it's own. This is something that if I built a wheel with 8 weights, I could demonstrate works on a working wheel. It's a mathematical principal I discovered. And I think everyone missed the point about the math   
One reason why I did not pursue it is because if it worked according to the math, it would be difficult for people not familiar with perpetual engineering to understand it. Of course, the fact that it would be able to rotate much faster would probably be what people would find most interesting.   
This is where my current build, if it works as math suggests it will, will be able to be used in such a way that anyone that is shown how it works would be able to understand it. I think this is something that would make it more interesting. Letting other people be able to say, ok, I get it.

p.s. AB Hammer might have reasons for no audio, but captions would still help to understand the point behind a video.

Greetings BAHammer

I have an old camera that has no sound and I need to purchase a new one. But as for descriptions on each step. My videos are open and clear. If you can't see what is happening you won't be able to understand it. All the information in writing you need, is posted with each post. Simply, it does or it don't. It will or it won't. If I told everything I know each time I would be giving away some of my secrets. It is up to the discerning eye as Bessler said to see.

_________________________________________________


Bessler007

You are fiction, therefore a lie. You hide behind a name so you can be bile at will. And no one knows who you really are, IMO to keep you from legal problems. You hide to be able to deceive and that reminds me of a thing from Hell. So go home and leave me alone.