Some "relevant?" Observation and an an approach.

[c0mster]

"I can verify by basic electrical theory, have the quite remarkable effect of making the energy oscillations escalate in strength sufficiently to overcome the resistance loss problem"

I tried thisÃ,  http://www.energyscience.org.uk/le/Le27/Berlin.htm Fig 2, using a tesla type coil and I canââ,¬â,,¢t get the capacitors to work correct. I draw .10 ma from the battery and get only 80 % out after the caps become charged. I am going to try it with layden jars, they seem to work better with static electricity. Perhaps this circuit is based on static electricity which is created by the high voltage.

CamsterÃ, 

[HopeForHumanity]

Oh, how much we have learned over the years!

[pauldude000]

@Mannix

I was so sure I had it right.......
so sure......

In fact, I was full of the brown stuff. "TPU Uncovered" my ____.

Teaches me to read part of a thing in depth, only scanning over this or that part thinking it is irrelevant. I had a FEW things right.. UGGGH!

I just CAREFULLY read through all of SM's collective posts. It is truly amazing how much info he gave. TONS. Theory, construction, pretty much everything but the control circuits.

I have a growing pile of junk wannabe TPU's, that have taught me more about bizarre field effects, though they are worthless for energy production.

Time to start over from scratch.

@all else

WHERE did half of the garbage being posted come from?

Kicks? the "mysterious", "elusive" kicks? WHAT MYSTERY? RAED the entire pdf, and you find that SM explained what they are, why they are, and where they come from......

Hash? AGAIN SM described it in detail!

Man, I have to clear my head of a bunch of complete trash information, which was nothing but personal interpretation of terms where no interpretation was necessary as it was originally fully described.

After reading SM's words carefully, I am now doubting the claims of the "supposed" TPU experts here, whom many mis-quote the hell out of everything he said. I wonder now if they refuse to share schematics etc.., simply because they don't have anything and are now just playing games.

I cannot speak about anyone else, but I AM STILL SERIOUS. If I have to revise my understanding a thousand times, I will.

Paul Andrulis

[Grumpy]

If I have to revise my understanding a thousand times, I will.

Paul Andrulis

Sure about that?

[pauldude000]

@Grumpy

Absolutely.

There are two kinds of information.

1. Truth (Obvious value)
2. Trash (Worthless unless recyclable)

I personally prefer truth. One of the most commonly used sayings of mine is "What I KNOW today, may well be what I KNOW is false tomorrow."

Paul Andrulis