PLEASE PUT WORKING CIRCUITS only HERE (for everybody please give a share)

[MrMag]

@gyulasun,

All is well and good when you say that output power comes mainly from broadcast stations antennas' electromagnetic energy furnished in by other people. However, you probably forget that here: http://actascientiae.org/v/comments.php?DiscussionID=9&page=1#Item_4 the OU is genuine and dos not come from extraneous sources. Of course, you’ll say that it’s not what you’re talking about. However, why not talk about something that is rather than talk about something that isn’t? I guess that was Tito’s intention to begin with.

Sorry, but quoting your own forum doesn't necessarily mean that it's proof of OU. If it is actually OU, what can you do with it? The amount is so minuscule it is pretty much useless.

[Omnibus]

It's not the quoting of whatever that matter. The facts matter and the facts indicate that it's the only instance of unequivocally demonstrated OU in an electrical circuit. That's what is significant. Scaling it is a detail.

[MrMag]

It's not the quating of whatever that matter. The fact matter and the facts indicate that it's the only instance of unequivocally demonstrated OU in an electrical circuit. That's what is significant. Scaling it is a detail.

I don't know what you mean by "quating". As far as I'm concerned, it has not been unequivocally demonstrated. So, have you closed the loop on your circuit? Have you ran it with a capacitor or battery for an extended time. I didn't think so. For all we know you might have just discovered a little glitch in spice. I'll give you credit for that. But I really think you need to do the scaling up before anyone will listen to you. It will not be significant until that is done.

[Omnibus]

Quoting.

No need for closing the loop or scaling up. We're not going to destroy science because some @MrMag doesn't understand how science works and typos are his main concern.

[MrMag]

Quoting.

No need for closing the loop or scaling up. We're not going to destroy science because some @MrMag doesn't understand how science works and typos are his main concern.

Why would scaling up or closing the loop destroy science? As far as I know, this is an OU forum and the people here are looking for a device that we can actually use. Are you saying that it can't be done with your circuit without destroying it?  Maybe your alleged discovery belongs in a science forum and not here. You try to come across as a scientist. Are you a scientist? What is your field of expertise?

I'm really not that worried about spelling but when a word is misspelled in a sentence that doesn't make sense, I usually ask. There is a spell check function on this forum and it's to bad that some people do not use it. We have many people here from all over the world and English is not their first language.