Bump induction...

[iacob alex]

    ...is an everyday "nasty" phenomenon,you must take into account ,when you are driving a car.

       Usually you can bump-up (then a short launch...) or bump-down (after a short launch...),it depends if you meet an elevation or a hole on your way.

       It's a very short time,when gravity requires that the car's mass (and your...so to "feel" inertia),bumps,moves along in an uneven way:  from linear to nonlinear.

       Your CoG experiences a "jerK" motion,a kind of acceleration of acceleration,it depends of your velocity and the curvature(concave,convex).
     
        It's a strong ,powerful,unpleasant tremble motion that you feel due to a changing trajectory of CoG: from translation to convex,or concave ...but never the both,two together.We try to avoid it..

        But some people(Milkovic and others),made this type of motion utilizable:they bumps a pivot in a bearing.

        You can capture the motion ,if you take a look at   www.veljkomilkovic.com   then at  "Key of Gravity Machine"/Jovan Marjanovic/see Fig.2

        In my opinion,they use instinctively , a bump/inertial induction ,and  they get as a result, an "wonder leverage"(output>input).

        All the problem is that you can not loop the process with a swinging pendulum motion...

        So,as Marjanovic says,if we really have a key to unlock the gravity power...we need one more key.

         The enjoyment of this game:....it's not over.

             
                                         All the Bests!  /  Alex

[hammuraby]

hi, the best way for saving a bump waste of cynetic energy,
is use a system that recicle at the same time the brake energy..  like this:
http://news.thomasnet.com/fullstory/484366

[iacob alex]

       Hi Hammuraby!

   Visiting  Thomasnet.com  ,I understand that the   "Hydrostatic RunWise drive system",recovers brake energy,stores for a time,and uses it LATER ,pumping the energy back for the breaking purpose.

   It is as a temporary postponed,suspended relation with inertia.

   Bump induction is an INSTANT relation with inertia.

   As you know, when you drive ,you "feel"  the bumps immediately,as a direct relation with inertia (I call it "inertial induction" due to fact that we provoke,induce a second,high degree acceleration...).

  As you see, face to face ,as I see ,the bump relation with inertia is so different:  a  retarding vs. a speedy one,or a decelerative vs.an ( greater) accelerative one.

  If you need to arouse and have a greater reaction of inertia,you need a greater acceleration(Newton's Second and Third Laws).

  It can be a chance for an input<output system,and for ..."free" power...

           
           All the Bests!  /  Alex

[iacob alex]

   ...that strong vibratory motion,that you feel when driving a car,is simply a sudden interplay with inertia,due to a high velocity and changing trajectory of CoG.

      Changing trajectory is the main point:you meet the inertia's answer (I like to call it inertial induction,as a rotor induces "something" in a stator).

       Your car is not an unicorp(steel ball),but an assembly of thousands of spare parts,so it's normal to have a dissipated motion(including yours...)

      It's an oblique collision between a relatively small mass and the Earth,comparable to the reflexibility of a light quanta on a mirror surface.

     The Russian scientist Lebedev,a century ago,tested the ponderous effect of light light in , vacuum...

     A bump inertial induction ,it's a "harsh" mechanical oblique reflection ,if we set this one, side by side,with an "ethereal"(light) one,but in the same conceptual line,also...let's remind the analogy of reflexion as a rebound ( Aristotle,Newton).

     Without any comment,naturally we have : input(momentum)=output(momentum).

     But,for a particular oscillatory weighting process(lever+swinging pendulum /see Milkovic),that I see as a continuous "bump"/changing trajectory inside a concave  surface/pivot,fulcrum,we have a "soft" answer from inertia.

     More,the weighting "machine",suggests that it's possible to have a different input/output ratio.

     This paradox,can be solved,if we take into consideration that in a pendular (eccentric mass) motion,we have rotational inertia.

      If the fulcrum is fixed,the radial component remains "burried" inside it.

      If the same fulcrum is free,the radial component is free(and "disponible") also.

      A more extensive concept,defines the reflexivity as a general property of matter and energy:a sine qua non.

       If we have the know-how to collect,"harvest" the so diffuse power of light ,why not to think  and test to get mechanical power with the same "idea":a surface and a focusing "technique".

      Key words:reflection,concave,surface...

                   All the Bests!  /  Alex