Stanley Meyer Explained

[Farrah Day]

People always see me as a negative and disruptive influence, and that may be so, but it's only down to the fact that no one seems to be capable of actually thinking for themselves.  I'm actually as intrigued by this subject as anyone else, it's just that I'm well grounded and don't live in a fantasy world like many here seem to. I also find it hard to continually tolerate nonsense posted by idiots.

The biggest thing here that makes no sense to me, is why anyone would at this stage be interested in building the gas processor in the first place. It's akin to fitting a supercharger on a car that as yet has no engine!

Surely the gas processor is of absolutely no use until someone firstly recreates Meyers method of high voltage, low current electrolysis - the super-efficient dissociation of water!

Perhaps it's just me, but wouldn't it seem far more logical to start from the beginning and overcome the initial and basic problem with Meyer's gas production, before worrying about how to energise the resulting gas.

Come on, is anyone actually making a substantial amount of hydroxy from a WFC at very low power??

I started a thread about the 'dissociation of the water molecule', because that's where it all starts from, that's the key to everything, but it seems people are just not interested in sorting out the basics. Everyone is trying to run before they have learned to walk, they want the cake but can't be bothered to bake it - it's just crazy!

[dankie]

H20power

I agree with John , we need a better starting point that your little circle thing . That 1000$ thing can be replaced by an inexpensive tiny piece of metal .

,what leds? , how was it made ? How was it pulsed ? Whats the voltage ?

All one big ?

distribution method after that

Seriously ... 

[h20power]

As you can see everyone his thinking(Farrah day) is flawed due to the fact he is unable to answer the primary question:

How did Stanley Meyer run a 1.6L aluminium series engine with an hho production rate of only 7L/min.?

For in answering this question you will see if you have an hho producing device capable of producing 7L/min. and you add on the Gas Processor would you not get the same results? Sure yours wont be as effiecent as Stanley Meyers but it will work none the less, am I right? I know people that have systems producing over 14L/min. with a 4-5 amp draw from the system. They can't run an engine with twice the amount of hho production as Stanley Meyer had, and I ask why is that? Answer is they don't have the Gas Processor doing the job it is supposed to be doing hooked up to the system.

And to add insult to injury, why would you not build it? For as Stanley Meyer made the change from gaseous injection to water injection the Gas Processor still remained apart of the system. Everyone put your thinking caps on and ask, "why is this person telling you not to build the Gas Processor?" If you reason it out you can only come to a few conclussions, but the primary conclussion is, he is trying to get you to not build a nesasary device found in the patents of Stanley Meyer's for the reason of keeping you all trapped in the energy enslavement game they have us all playing right now. Think about it.

Energy independence is now ours for the taking,
h2opower.

[h20power]

Dankie I can understand your confussion, but the resonant cavity unit is the WFC, not the Gas Processor the Gas Processor is part of the hydrogen fracturing process. You can see the resonant cavity unit here: http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/3217-stanley-meyer-explained-8.html#post51124

I have had it with this site for I can't explain anything due to not being able to load up imagies that I have.

[Farrah Day]

Firstly, 'he' is a 'she' as the more quick-minded around here might just have realised by now... ok, so... perhaps not too many then.

If you reason it out you can only come to a few conclussions, but the primary conclussion is, he is trying to get you to not build a nesasary device found in the patents of Stanley Meyer's for the reason of keeping you all trapped in the energy enslavement game they have us all playing right now

H2O you muppet, why would I want to do that? If you have ever read any of my threads you would realise that I want to get to the bottom of this as much as anyone else. It's simply illogical to start from the later end and work toward the beginning - surely even you can see this.

As for asking me to answer a stupid question again and again, get over it, because it all depends on whether or not you believe Meyer ran his 1.6l VW, and I for one - as already mentioned - have never considered the man remotely credible.

Do you have a balanced chemical equation for what happens when you ignite hydrogen ions in the presence of heavily ionised oxygen ions?  How can these ions react to form molecules or water??? Or are you, like others before you, not going to let real science get in the way?

And for Christ's sake, there is a 'c' in necessary, and only one 's' in conclusion. I guess education is all relative, eh!