Stanley Meyer Explained

[h20power]

Hello Alan,


That pdf was created on November 14, 2016 and I spoke of this way back in September of 2013 at the 2013 Global Breakthrough Energy Movement conference held in Boulder, Colorado. I first shared this with this forum in September of 2019. And if you noticed I first got the WFC working correctly way back in 2009/2010, but I still had much to learn as I allowed myself to be swayed by Don Gable's advice. I've been working on this technology since March of 2006. The reason why I waited so long to share my new theory was due to I already knew folks would be trying to tell me that I didn't create it first so I had to let a lot of time pass before sharing the theory in a public space. Now no one can make the claim they created this theory before I did, understand? I will have my place in the history books as no one can take that away from me.


As for Secure Supplies that guy is a thief as he had stolen the pictures I posted of my WFC and had them for sale on his site without ever making contact with me. I'd be willing to bet that Don Gabel has no idea that he is being said to be working with him with anything.


There are parts of this technology that Meyer himself didn't know as if he did he would have gotten the water fuel injectors working. Just think of it this way, why would Meyer be making a research facility if he already knew how it all worked? Wouldn't he have used that money to go into mass production instead?


As for your question asking me to explain how DC pulses become V+ and V- yes I could share this information but I have chosen not to. I know this makes folks upset at me but we all have our secrets. It took me a while to understand just what the transformer was actually doing and for the most part I learned how it all worked when I stopped working on the WFC and moved to try and understand the Gas Processor back in 2008. Again at the time when I wanted to study other things about this technology I was told by everyone that I was just wasting my time by the forum members.


When I read the SMTB I saw it for what it was as it was explaining in the longest winded explanation I had ever seen of the process of atoms going into ionization and ejecting their electrons. This ability I have comes naturally and at the time I assumed everyone else was like me, but a good friend of mines pulled me to the side and explained to me that everyone was not like me. Where I saw things so clearly everyone else saw nothing but gibberish. Once you take a very close look at how Meyer went about explaining this technology you may or may not be able to see that what he did was to hide the technology in plain sight coming up with his own terminology that was outside of main stream science descriptions. Meyer did a really good job of hiding the technology in plain sight as people to this day will talk about the things he said, just as you just did, without knowing the real science behind Meyer's made up terminology. Terms like, "Amp Leakage," I showed in the graph I shared on this forum when I took the sump of all the energies being read on the oscilloscope at the WFC. That in itself is something new that I shared that is totally outside of how Meyer talked about this technology as I had taken things back to a true scientific perspective. I don't know of anyone outside of myself that has ever thought of taking the sum of the energies being sent to the WFC, do you?


I posted a link just below my crowdfund link to give you a hint on a few other ways we know of in how to get the electrons away from their atoms but it seems that you are so unwilling to donate to the cause that you missed it. Heat can be used, radioactivity, light, high voltage potential differences, electro magnetism and other forms of strong magnetic fields, and more as acid/base reactions are just another way to get the electrons away from their atoms that most living things use to stay alive. In nature most of the time more than one method is used together to accomplish this.
Now I wouldn't recommend using strong radioactive elements to break the bonds of the water molecules in this fashion as I am pretty sure that will never meet accepted safety standards for use in vehicles. Making use of strong magnetic fields requires a lot of energy input so that's out. But mimicking how nature does things by photo bombardment with light and ionization do not require a lot of energy input and they can be used together to lower the energy requirements and/or target specific atoms that one wishes to ionize.


I'd be willing to bet that now that I have shared an approximant time I came up with the theory that those that wish to belittle me are now going to be conducting a massive search for someone else that may have came up with the theory before I did. But I have already run many a search so, good luck. In any event I learned of this connection as I was making use of the scientific method and very carefully observing the results of my experiments asking and answering questions the whole way. Now I have reached the point where I am ready to move this technology into mass production but I have to start out small as I simply don't have the funds to start off big. But since this technology can be utilized in so many different ways I am also having a hard time picking someplace to start. Our more pressing need is to take on climate change head on but I can't seem to gather the supporters I need to kick things off. I can only move as fast as my budget will allow me to move.


Something else to note is when I started this thread it was more or less a challenge where everyone had to do their own work and my mindset really hasn't changed all that much since then. Right now the world has to wait until I can get the last remaining things I need to build things correctly and hopefully scale things up soon afterwards.


Shabbat Shalom,
Edward Mitchell
CEO and Owner
True Green Solutions
https://www.gofundme.com/f/energy-independence-for-you-and-me

[sm0ky2]

many people get lost in the electrolysis device
This is not as important as it seems.


It needs to provide enough gas to start the engine from battery current
And operate at full nominal production from alternator current.
Even at half of the carnot %, the heat side of the combustion equation for HHO
provides enough torque to run the engine at more HP than gasoline.


an all aluminum block, and radiator may be able to dissipate the heat im not sure
in all small (1-2HP) benchtop tests, the engines run, run the alternator, produce their own gas, and can drive a load, until they overheat, melt the seals, warp the pistons and covers, etc.


With a small motor this happens after about 2-3 hrs or the size of a 3-gal water tank.
some have tried upgrading to titanium piston heads and cylinders. For me this seems too $$$.
I have read enough reports of similar overheating on full sized vehicles to deter me from sacrificing a guinea pig car. Theres a lot of math involved, cylinder size, stroke:displacement, compression %, and so on. Some engines may be able to handle hho better than others. Lawn care equipment has a heavy compression, and since they overheat easily, I probably wouldnt hho a diesel.
A light weight, low-hp car, maybe look for aluminum blocks, upgrade to a new all Al radiator
Use a custom coolant


Getting to run is easy. You dont want to build up back pressure in your fuel system, but you want a flow-restrictor valve to fine tune it to the engine.
Once you get the right mixture the engine will idle loud and quickly, you have to adjust the idle down
back into the normal range. Watch the increase in gas when the alternator kicks in, if it gets too heavy turn up the resistance to the electrolyzer (or move the plates further apart, etc)


You need at least 2 (redundant) fire arrestors.


With a newer car, you will recode the ecu to lower the air intake,
it will burn a little lean and lower your hp per fuel ratio, but it's possible.

[h20power]

many people get lost in the electrolysis device
This is not as important as it seems.


It needs to provide enough gas to start the engine from battery current
And operate at full nominal production from alternator current.
Even at half of the carnot %, the heat side of the combustion equation for HHO
provides enough torque to run the engine at more HP than gasoline.


an all aluminum block, and radiator may be able to dissipate the heat im not sure
in all small (1-2HP) benchtop tests, the engines run, run the alternator, produce their own gas, and can drive a load, until they overheat, melt the seals, warp the pistons and covers, etc.


With a small motor this happens after about 2-3 hrs or the size of a 3-gal water tank.
some have tried upgrading to titanium piston heads and cylinders. For me this seems too $$$.
I have read enough reports of similar overheating on full sized vehicles to deter me from sacrificing a guinea pig car. Theres a lot of math involved, cylinder size, stroke:displacement, compression %, and so on. Some engines may be able to handle hho better than others. Lawn care equipment has a heavy compression, and since they overheat easily, I probably wouldnt hho a diesel.
A light weight, low-hp car, maybe look for aluminum blocks, upgrade to a new all Al radiator
Use a custom coolant


Getting to run is easy. You dont want to build up back pressure in your fuel system, but you want a flow-restrictor valve to fine tune it to the engine.
Once you get the right mixture the engine will idle loud and quickly, you have to adjust the idle down
back into the normal range. Watch the increase in gas when the alternator kicks in, if it gets too heavy turn up the resistance to the electrolyzer (or move the plates further apart, etc)


You need at least 2 (redundant) fire arrestors.


With a newer car, you will recode the ecu to lower the air intake,
it will burn a little lean and lower your hp per fuel ratio, but it's possible.

Hi sm0ky2,


I understand the technology far better than that. In order to keep it from burning up the engine the engines EGR system has to be modified and the exhaust gases need to be meter mixed into the intake system with a solenoid valve. For flashback protection that's what the quenching technology is for as there is no need for bubblers in this system. The Gas Processor will up the energy content by stripping electrons from the oxygen atoms entering the engines intake system and sending those highly unstable monatomic oxygen gas atoms into the combustion chamber and then spark igniting the mixture of unstable hydrogen and oxygen gas atoms. What this does is prolong the formation of the water molecules by forcing the hydrogen atoms to manufacture those missing electrons as it moves to form the water molecules with the oxygen atoms missing electrons.


When done properly converting a typical engine will transform the engine from being an air polluter into being an air cleaner as the gases coming out of the tailpipe will be cleaner than the air that was drawn into the engine. This has already been done and all I have to do is follow the one whom did this's lead. This is why I had said to everyone that I am the proper man for the task at hand as I have done my homework and I've been a mechanic for well over 30 years now so I know my way around engines. Meyer put it best in stating, "Success is measured by the determination to make it work... and successful we shall be," thus I know I will be successful as I am very determined. My determination should be clear by the amount of time I have been working on this technology and never throwing in the towel as I started in on all of this way back in March of 2006.


You are correct that some engine designs are better than others but I feel all types of vehicles can be converted from using fossil fuels to using this technology, be they on the land, floating in the water, or flying in the air, as basically all that is being done is switching the source of hydrogen. One must respect the fuel and all should go well. I am ready to start the long process of phasing out the use of fossil fuels but I know I can't do this alone, thus this technology will be creating many jobs as True Green Solution grows as a company. I will try my best to be a fair employer that shares the wealth with my employees and not steal their earnings as most companies do now days by following this man's lead: [size=78%]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uvHwyrem24M&t=82s[/size]


In order for this to take place at the speed needed to do something about our climate change problems I started a crowdfund so that people can donate to the cause and help this technology accomplish it's mission of putting people in full control of their own energy needs. It's not easy to start mass producing things and I really could use the full support of the people on this as after all it will be allowing them to become energy independent thus never having to pay for energy ever again so why not ask for their help in ensuring that this technology actually makes it to the marketplace this time around?
The task of phasing out the use of fossil fuels world wide is a daunting one but it must be done if our children are to have a future worth living. Someone in this world must therefore take on the responsibility of ushering this technology into our world and I feel I am that someone.


From my perspective the longer people wait to support my efforts to bring this technology out the longer the world will have to wait for an actual solution that will get us out of this mess. It's high time we head to Stanly Meyer's dreams of us coming together in one accord in support of this technology. Big things often have small beginnings and I feel this is the start of something big🥰.[/font][/size]


Shabbat Shalom Everyone,
Edward Mitchell
CEO and Owner
True Green Solutions
https://gofund.me/87a49b22

[massive]

It needs to provide enough gas to start the engine from battery current
And operate at full nominal production from alternator current.

The Battery and alternator are physically limited by the quantity of lead and copper, to the amount of available free electrons they can provide

the difference from 12v and 24v battery is physical size. the difference from car and truck alternator, is physical size

[alan]

Respectfully
"From my perspective the longer people wait to support my efforts to bring this technology out the longer the world will have to wait for an actual solution that will get us out of this mess. "


From the perspective of the people, they don't see what you have other than claims and old video's, people have to trust your word for it with their money without seeing your current progress, they only have  the (well written) pdf that explains it, they're one click away from continuing their day., but first they read on wiki to find out who Stan was.   
Do you know kickstarter? They present everything, and they reach their multi-million goals, but funders are promised to receive something according to a tier.   
But this tech comes with personal risks, so I understand your caution.   I'm sure everyone gets blown away when you show how you have progressed. Better stick to the plan but don't blame the people.   
Or you could start selling it as modules to get $ (like Meyer did) instead of tightly regulate its use and product release. I don't think it will make anyone rich, because if it is possible then it has to have been suppressed. JP Morgan underfunded Tesla after he asked 'where do we put the meter?'so he set him up for failure. 
The elite's power is their greed for money and their capital against us and our greed but without capital. But YHWH own's it all. In His kingdom gold is used a bricks.
my next 2ct's 
Best regards