Stanley Meyer Explained

[alan]

Hi,

I'm trying to replicate WFC?

Using inox 304
2 m * 1 m

My goal:
15 liter per minute hho production rate!!

In the standard way of electrolysis
2106 watts of input.

Rgds
Vortex 22

Just study this:
https://www.pbs.org/tesla/res/res_art05.html
HV HF zero amps, high impedance/resistance, made to study the effects of alternating high-intensity fields."The two halves are wound oppositely and connected in series"

[h20power]

It's a good thing Vortex 22 more than likely knows not to listen to you two as this technology simply doesn't work like those examples you gave. It works as I have said it works over and over again by way of ionization as that's how this technology goes about breaking the bonds of the water molecules. The problem is it's not that easy to match a transformer to a WFC and it's even harder to understand the science behind it if you don't perform the experiments yourself following the scientific method. That means you have to get all the needed tools so that you can see just what it is you are doing like a differential probe for starters and a oscilloscope.


Shalom Everyone,
Edward Mitchell
Owner
True Green Solutions
https://gofund.me/94431e56

[ramset]

Mr.Wizard
Respectfully we don't need hints and great volumes of literature !
Your friend vortex22.. who you said was aware ?
Seemed to arrive unaware?


We could continue to fiddle or point fingers until our extinction...


Please share a bit more detail ( even to help your "already aware" friend!


The need is great !
Perhaps another topic ?


I believe the open source hydrogen section here has several good moderator /experimenters ( Grumage and Jimboot?
And I see Dog one ...also very very familiar !
Respectfully
Chet K
EDIT for below
Mr Wizard
I see you preach a Devine connection to prejudgement and condemnation ( swine ..? ..some weird type of Devine ?

IMO
It takes a teacher ...or we could waste another decade ....

[h20power]

https://www.philosophy.org/uploads/5/2/2/0/52207651/fulcrum_v1n2_august_1992.pdf

In October 1991 Stanley Meyer visited The University of Science & Philosophy (www.philosophy.org) formerly located at Swannanoa Palace.
Why?
In short, because Stanley believed the center of an atom was 'God' or a point of Omnipresent Universal vacuum aka "Stillness".
Dr. Walter Russell made this same claim decades before Stanley ever played with water, and his many books and lectures prove this point.
https://www.philosophy.org/store/p42/Space_and_the_Hydrogen_Age.html#/ published 1939!!!

So, if the goal of this thread is to Explain Stanley's technology... why not follow in his footsteps? perhaps follow his train of thought? and "ASK THE RIGHT QUESTION!"

A friendly tip to all on here. 

-wlw

It's clear to me that you haven't read this thread as I am past Meyer now with my understanding of this technology in scientific terms and I shared this information with everyone free of charge. I did ask the right questions that allowed me to understand the science behind this technology and in this thread I am sure I even gave examples found in nature proving the theory I have for this technology, you know scientific proof?!


Now I will admit that I don't share everything that I am doing and that's because I worked hard to know what I know about this technology and after the video interview John Fraser gave of Gunther and I at the 2013 Global Breakthrough Energy Movement held in Boulder, Colorado, as I saw folks turn on me just because of the color of my skin. So, at that point in time when I realized that I was being singled out for my skin tone I basically refused to share anymore as I have just had enough already. I watch just whom folks wanted to be the one that brought this technology out and that someone quit this technology and moved on to something totally different several times never truly looking back at this technology ever again.


Then there are people like you whom come to my thread and just assume they know how this technology works moving to compare the technology to something it absolutely has no connections too. Then people like you will reach to unknows to sit in because it appears to be a safe place to sit back and hope someone like me will just give you a pass, NOT! In this thread I went over the science behind this technology and gave examples just like a good scientist is supposed to do. And to this date no one that I am aware of has reached the voltage levels I have reached with this technology and most still don't understand how to read the oscilloscope correctly in terms of science. I showed in this very thread just how this technology restricts the flow of amps flowing through the water bath and explained why the water never heats up with that explanation.


Since I went the route of making use of the scientific method it's a bit tough for someone to just come into this thread and point people in the wrong direction as again I gave examples. As for your being friends with Vortex 22 remember he ask me and not you. But in all truth I don't know either of you personally nor do either of you know me. Coming to this thread thinking pointing folks to an unknown truly isn't going to fly if anything to say about it I have.


In my point of view the reason why no one has duplicated this technology thus far is the fact there is so much bad information being put out about this technology designed to lead people away from just how it all works. Meyer himself was very good at hiding the technology in plain sight. Meyer made up words that only had meaning to him, made drawings that lied or left out the whole story, and went out of his way to make sure no one stole his work from him. That's the true Meyer not this figment of people's imagination that has been put in the place of the real man. But it wasn't wrong of him to want to profit from all of his hard work as capitalism would have it no other way, correct? When you think of things in the correct terms, you know, "Asking the right questions," you will start to see Meyer as just a man with a dream of having a successful business as he moved to change the world for the better. Unfortunately those that sell energy weren't ready to give up their primary cash cow back then and I really don't think they will ever be ready to part with that cash cow willingly of their own free will as long as there are profits to be made.


With this technology it is very hard to build a transformer to match a WFC properly. With all that bad and misleading information swarming around this technology it's very tough for people to ask the right questions let along answer any of them. I haven't found anyone who is willing to make use of the scientific method on this technology as that method will have one buying all the many tools they need, building one design after another until they get it right, and a whole lot more as it's a very long and costly endeavor. People in general are too afraid to fail.


Shalom,
Edward Mitchell
Owner
True Green Solutions
https://gofund.me/94431e56

[Vortex 22]

But my friend, you already know how!

use DC Capacitor Electrons Captor, and connect it straight to plates in water. WFC is just air capacitor plates in water. u can make electrolysis with simple AV plug, which is open circuit.
no need to pull so many watts to make gas! 

if you add neutral plates to the cell, not connected, a la JoeCell, then amps drop even more and produce twice the gas!
I have made HHO gas with 0amps input, many times.

Thanks be to Joe, the modern water master.
Good luck!
-wlw

Hi all

Fascinating stuff !!

My friend WLW,

Show us !!  Say 7 L per minute of GAZ production rate ? please

Thank you
Vortex