Stanley Meyer Explained

[h20power]

Thanks Chet,

Right now all I need is the funding as all the science is now done. I know where all the energy comes from to do what Stanley Meyer did now. When he spoke of resonance he was talking about more than one type of resonance. For example the Gas Processor is a light(radiant energy) resonant chamber and works just like a charge pump in a laser resonante cavity. I go over everything here at this site: http://www.hereticalbuilders.com/showthread.php?t=174

Now I know also how the EPG system works  . All I had to do was stick to real science until I finnaly found where all the missing energies where coming from.

Enjoy becoming Energy Independent,
h2opower.

[h20power]

Just incase the site above's link isn't working here is another: http://www.refresheverything.com/truegreensolutions
Again thanks everyone for your support for I can't do this with out you 

h2opower.

[Torana]

L505 has got you all beat , that guys got a Stanley Steamer and a pile of tea bags to stuff in the burner, clever dude he is, hats off.

[L505]

from reading the last couple pages of talk about electrons, i get the distinct idea that you consider them to be discrete particles, is this correct? are you suggesting that electrons are discrete particles?

Stanley Meyer is the one who thought electrons are little "happy face" particles being consumed - not me.  He drew them like that. Why are you questioning me when you should be questioning Stanley Meyer's drawings?

The only thing I am doing is asking the same bloody question which everyone always avoids: how are electrons consumed, when in fact electrons in circuits just move from one place to another? Do you not understand how electrons don't just fly out of the wire and disappear into nowhere while a circuit is running?

The question being asked is how the electrons are "stripped" and "consumed", when technically electricity is NOT actually "consumed". The idea of electron "consumption" is a myth spread by electricity companies to the general public who do not understand the basics of electricity. It makes it easier to explain to the general population (idiots) that electrons are "consumed" but that's not how it works. Electrons do not disappear and become "consumed" or eaten up magically by pacman in traditional circuits. The electrons simply move from one place to another.   Unless, of course Stan figured out a way to just magically make the electrons disappear into thin air (and he didn't explain this at all, if so).

From what I can tell. Stan thought that lightbulbs "burn off" electrons. Light bulbs don't fricking do this! They just release light photons and heat, they don't fry and burn electrons as if it is some kind of electron barbecue. Maybe his device somehow worked but he just completely misunderstood it. It doesn't give me too much hope when you read a patent where someone thinks light bulbs fry off electrons like you are cooking eggs on a stove or something.

All someone has to do is explain how the electrons or waves are "consumed" which makes no sense to anyone who understands basic electricity. Unfortunately the quacks that visit this forum don't even understand basic electricity.  You don't have to go to school to learn about electrons and electricity, it's all available online.  If the electrons are consumed or disappear in Stan's device, one has to explain why and how, since electricity doesn't even work that way in the first place! They go from one place to another. If the mass is converted to energy and that's what Stan means, then where are these electrons going to come from to replace the lost ones, when it goes out the tail pipe? Water with missing electrons out the tailpipe may be cancerous and toxic. 

Of course, if the Stanley device never actually worked, and he was just theorizing like the retards on this page, then obviously the reason why it didn't work was because Stanley didn't understand basic electricity where electrons are not eaten up or consumed. Or, maybe his device did work and he simply misunderstood how it worked, and/or his explanation was missing a lot of details. Someone else claims it is converting mass to energy using acceleration. Consuming mass is not "free" energy, it's close, but not free;  That's just atomic energy like a bomb (still a good idea if it works, but not free energy device), and it is consuming mass.

One has to make sure we don't screw up our environment by giving off radiation and/or consuming mass that we don't want to consume (i.e. taking mass out of oceans, one would have to calculate how much mass is lost with millions of cars/airplanes). A proper explanation and balanced equations is still required for this device to ever be taken seriously. No one has provided ANY whatsoever.

This all reminds me of when people are working on a car and repairing parts blindly without knowing how the car works.  Car won't start? try replacing a relay see if it works.  Even if the relay isn't the problem, replace it anyway. Car still won't work? try cleaning the carb, see if it works. Still doesn't work? Try the distribitor cap, plugs, wires, and the coil. Still doesn't work? Try some more. Trial and error figuring things out will get the car working eventually, but it's better to know what the bloody problem is and how to solve it precisely, instead of putting on a blind fold and diddling around in your shop without a clue. 

[Torana]

Hey L505,  Theres  mountains of crap to do with Stans circuit and its MOSTLY taken as gospel
The old saying " if christians move in next door , ...count ya chickens..."

I read Stans Bro , stephen  was a military electrician and both worked on the project over 10 years so its fair to say Stan knew What he / they were doing but as public speaking goes ,1 he had to protect his investment , 2 how would ANYONE explain electronics to the general public?
so naturally it sounds like gibberish .
Im into electronics and It sometimes drives me nuts when I read some or more like lots of "free energy" concepts . Im guessing your getting rubbed the wrong way with the info , thing is ,if you KNOW it doesnt make sense ,chances are your correct .
Youll find that ALL patents are misleading for a reason but you try telling anyone that.
Theyre written by the --PATENT OFFICE-- , they are NOT and never meant to be instruction manuals.
Try to build a mic oven from the patent, try making KFC chicken , try making coke cola , All these corps have intellectual property and it is protected by a peice of paper .

So ..is stans patent drawings factual? hell no , was he giving away his tech ? hell no.
I live on the island that stan came to in the "house video in NZ" and I can tell you theres no cars here running on water. theres h2 boosters but thats all.

People have a choice to learn about electronics but how many want to put in the time?