Howard Johnson Replication Tube Claim

[nyctuber]

Too bad! Stirling seems to be single handily discrediting the whole OU effort. Jumping on things before any proper duedilligence has been done. Creating hype around easily faked Youtube videos.

He's a hopeful well-intentioned guy but it did make me cringe.

On the other hand, the non-OU MYT engine does actually work. Not sure if it will get picked up, though.

[HiggsField]

@nyctuber

Thank's for putting me onto this. Looks very interesting. Not offten you come across truly inspired inventions. Be interesting to see the thermodynamic cycle of this engine. Do you no its efficiency? PM me.

[nyctuber]

@nyctuber

Thank's for putting me onto this. Looks very interesting. Not offten you come across truly inspired inventions. Be interesting to see the thermodynamic cycle of this engine. Do you no its efficiency? PM me.

This guy's been kicking around since at least 2006 (not sure if thats good or bad) According to the info, it can hit 100% with ideal fuel position, but weight savings alone would make it inherently more efficient than a traditional engine. Not sure if the torque is what the guy claims either. I don't hold my breath on any of this stuff.

http://www.angellabsllc.com/

http://pesn.com/2009/01/13/9501512_MassiveYetTiny_Engine_to_Production/

They're looking for a 10 million buck investment. Gulp...

[dragon]

This guy's been kicking around since at least 2006 (not sure if thats good or bad) According to the info, it can hit 100% with ideal fuel position, but weight savings alone would make it inherently more efficient than a traditional engine. Not sure if the torque is what the guy claims either. I don't hold my breath on any of this stuff.

http://www.angellabsllc.com/

http://pesn.com/2009/01/13/9501512_MassiveYetTiny_Engine_to_Production/

They're looking for a 10 million buck investment. Gulp...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kGlUZg2pC0Q
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Itl9ipaIJ_o&feature=related

[lumen]

I was looking at the Massive Yet Tiny engine a while back, but not for combustion but for a magnetic motor.
The movement seems to be exactly what is needed to build a magnetic motor on a principal that I had tested and seems to produce OU.

It works like this:
At the points where compression takes place, the cylinder wall is a short iron ring while the remainder is either non magnetic or simply not there.

The cylinders are magnets or a ring of magnets setup for repulsion to the other cylinder.

Now when the thing runs, the first cylinder moves to the iron as it is attracted, while it's field is pulled to the iron the second cylinder moves into the iron also and is still attracted because the first cylinder has moved even deeper into the ring.

Then as they move together to the end of the ring the first cylinder starts to leave the ring but under repulsion while the second cylinder leaves the ring under repulsion again because the cylinder behind it had already moved into the ring and so it continues!

This means nothing if you have not studied the cycle of this motor. ( may still mean nothing regardless )

Principal:  a magnet with it's fields attracted to something changes the shape of the field and can allow another magnet with it's field shape changed to move into close positions without the usual field repulsion.