Howard Johnson Replication Tube Claim

[nyctuber]

"Mylow clearly did not use one?  Were you there?  Heck, you/we would have never known TK used a motor unless he showed us.  I think this point is VERY relevant.  Gee, I can only think of about 20 ways I could fake this and I believe, the smarter guys on here could come up with way more than that.  Just open your mind a little and don't make absolute statements like "Mylow clearly did not use one."  No one knows for sure except Mylow.  Oh , and the FBI, the NSA and the CIA and God knows who else.

Bill

Yes it's clear he didn't use one. Mylow routinely showed the underside of his device. He also routinely stopped it by hand. How exactly would he do that if if was running via electric motor? A remote controlled battery operated motor inside the base which he is constantly starting and stopping? Don't think so. No sonic signature whatsoever as far as I can tell.

[AnandAadhar]

Hi Dan,

Those are very nice-looking graphics.  Thanks for sending them.  I've posted them at http://peswiki.com/index.php/OS:MYLOW:Drawings:Dan_Jonsson


OS:MYLOW:Drawings:Dan Jonsson - In addition to providing some good-looking graphics of Mylow's design, Dan Jonsson proposes and electromagnetic variant. "The whole idea is that you could implement the Bedini principle in order to convert the magnetic flux to electricity and boost the opposit magnetic field to speed up the rotation, spin up the electrons and thus minimizing the demagnetization." (PESWiki; April 23, 2009)

I also added one of the graphics to the home page at http://mylowmagnetmotor.com

Sterling

----- Original Message -----
From: "DAN JONSSON"
To: "Sterling D. Allan"
Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2009 9:38 AM
Subject: Re: Idea: Mylow joined with Keppe


I have tinkered a bit on mylows idea. I made some image i wanted to
present. I have more on the way but i wont work any more on them
unless they can be of inventress to any of you.

the whole idea is that you could implement the bedini principle
inorders to convert the magnetic flux to electricity and boost the
opposit magnetic field to speed up the rotation, spin up the electrons
and thus making the demagnetization kepping on a minimum.

If this is of use to any of you please let me know.

Best regards

Dan Jonsson

Talking about Bedini.... We earlier discussed doubts here about Bearden and Bedini because of Mylow. The whole thing compromises Johnson who's a trusted friend of Bearden and Bedini. We also failed with Brady's Perendev version of Johnson's motor patent. It all leads back to Johnson. So, maybe we should first study Bearden's books better and try to follow some of his suggestions for a permanent magnet motor. For anyone seriously interested in Bearden's writings I add here the link to download his book 'Energy from the Vacuum - Concepts and principles" at scribd.com (© Attribution Non-commercial)

http://www.scribd.com/doc/13801534/Bearden-Energy-From-the-Vacuum-Concepts-and-Principles-2002-org

Has anyone tried his suggestion for an all magnet motor without coils and wire? Only without coils and wire the relativism principle and paradigm that lames this planet can be broken. We should be more aware about the theorical side of this and be critical about Einstein and his relativity principle. Remember that Bruce DePalma proved it wrong with his spinning ball trajectory experiment. Inertial mass spinning changes the gravitational mass effect in a trajectory and thus Einstein's principle of general relativity is not always true. That's why DePalma was ousted by the scientific community. But it worked and Paramahamsa Tewari has his Space Energy generator from it.

So what was Bearden's suggestion? Studying him, who as a physicist is critical enough about relativism i'd say, he turns out to mention e.g. at page 376 of the book the use of "skin depth magnetic switching" (an idea of Bedini, see picture). This Bedini-switch suggestion reminds me of Gary's neutral zone oscillator nobody could replicate as yet. Still Gary, a contemporary of Tesla was the first to produce a working all magnet motor in history based upon diamagnetic switching. But Tesla was more attractive at the time as an effective power generator alas, and Gary was neglected since. Al Francoeur tried Gary's patent but couldn't get Gary's principle under control. Is this skin deep magnetism switching maybe a way to manage a rotary magnet set up better than this perpetual disappointment with Mylow, Brady, and ultimately, yes, Johnson? We don't want to lose Bearden and Bedini in this, don't we?

AA

Links:
Rexresearch on Gary: http://www.rexresearch.com/gary/gary1.htm
Al's experiment: http://keelynet.com/energy/gary2001.htm
My story about this perpetual motion affair: http://theorderoftime.com/science/free_energy/4.html
Gaby de Wilde's version of the diamagnetic perpetual motion switch on YouTube:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-7M6S2brhFE&feature=channel_page

[Lakes]

Yes it's clear he didn't use one. Mylow routinely showed the underside of his device. He also routinely stopped it by hand. How exactly would he do that if if was running via electric motor? A remote controlled battery operated motor inside the base which he is constantly starting and stopping? Don't think so. No sonic signature whatsoever as far as I can tell.

You don`t have to use a motor directly coupled to the disk, a rotating magnet on a motor off screen would cause the disk to spin and you could still stop the disk by hand.

I`m not saying that that mylow did this, just that its not difficult to do even if it were on a glass top table.

[hansvonlieven]

A simple rubber band in the bearing housing would be sufficient to get it running. It would not be difficult to do this.

Hans von Lieven

[Hoppy]

A simple rubber band in the bearing housing would be sufficient to get it running. It would not be difficult to do this.

Hans von Lieven

An elastic band is a distinct possibility, or perhaps a spring. I think this was faked and as has been suggested, there are no doubt various ways of doing it by someone with a innovative mind.

Hoppy