Howard Johnson Replication Tube Claim

[ALFPARTS]

I have a question, yes. Do I really need to ask it? OK, then:

Which one of those things in that lab there can "close the loop" and run itself indefinitely, without batteries?

Answer: The train that he is showing will do this. However, Bedini either got the wrong one from Howard or has purposely disabled it. The normal operation of the train device is such that the car literally zooms out the other end. That version is still in Howard's lab. Please excuse me but the point of my including the link to the train video was for illustration of three points. 1) Bedini got the train from Howard on false pretenses. He was supposed to test it and return it 2) Bedini shows a marginally or what might be considered as a non functional device which is known to us as being fully functional. Why do you suppose that he does this? 3) The circuit of the linear track train is the same as the rotary device. hint hint.

[TinselKoala]

page 7

http://www.cheniere.org/techpapers/electromagnetic.pdf

As a fourteenth approach, Johnson [27] has built many novel linear and rotary
motors and at least one self-powering magnetic rotary device â€" later stolen in a
mysterious break-in at his laboratory â€" personally tested by the present author.
Johnson uses a bidirectional "two particle" theory of magnetic flux lines which
can be justified by Whittaker's earlier work showing the internal bidirectional
energy flows in all potentials and fields. He also utilizes controlled spin-waves
and self-initiated precise exchange forces, which are known to momentarily
produce bursts of very strong forcefields [28]. His approach is to use highly
nonlinear assemblies of magnets which initiate the foregoing phenomena at very
precise points in the rotation cycle. In short, he seeks to produce precisely located and directed sudden magnetic forces, using self-initiated nonlinear
magnetic phenomena. This is analogous to what the Wankel engine did using
the Lenz law effect by sharply interrupting a weak current in a external coil. We
point out that the Lenz law effect and other very abrupt field changes
momentarily produce not only an amplified Poynting energy flow component,
but also an amplified Heaviside energy flow component as well....

That's pretty funny too.
Tom's a great read, but once you've heard it once, you've heard pretty much all. I challenge anyone to put together a coherent hypothesis that makes a testable prediction, that cannot be explained conventionally, out of his theorizing.
He said substantially the same thing as above when asked about the OCMPMM of "alsetalokin", as I recall.
Oh, and you should ask him for how long he observed HJ's motor run while he was personally testing it.

[TinselKoala]

Answer: The train that he is showing will do this. (snip)

Close the loop and continue running indefinitely.
No, it won't.
I'm sorry, but PROVE ME WRONG by doing it. It's simple enough--according to you.
I get hostile when people make claims they cannot back up, especially when they involve perpetual motion SMOTs.
You say that train will close the loop. I won't be the only one arguing that it cannot, because we've all been down that track before.

[ALFPARTS]

That's pretty funny too.
Tom's a great read, but once you've heard it once, you've heard pretty much all. I challenge anyone to put together a coherent hypothesis that makes a testable prediction, that cannot be explained conventionally, out of his theorizing.
He said substantially the same thing as above when asked about the OCMPMM of "alsetalokin", as I recall.
Oh, and you should ask him for how long he observed HJ's motor run while he was personally testing it.

You can ask me

[ALFPARTS]

Close the loop and continue running indefinitely.
No, it won't.
I'm sorry, but PROVE ME WRONG by doing it. It's simple enough--according to you.
I get hostile when people make claims they cannot back up, especially when they involve perpetual motion SMOTs.
You say that train will close the loop. I won't be the only one arguing that it cannot, because we've all been down that track before.

Ooops, sorry but I was in error when addressing this to you. I meant to send it to someone else.