Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Howard Johnson Replication Tube Claim

Started by X00013, March 17, 2009, 06:27:33 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 49 Guests are viewing this topic.

nyctuber

Quote from: ALFPARTS on May 19, 2009, 11:09:13 PM
I just noticed a comment by Dr. Schmitt:
This seems to make sense.

It's because the copper alloy that you are using is probably not is not pure electrolytic copper but a copper/ hard nickle ferromagnetic alloy. When you slide one pole along the surface of the copper bar it orients the the regions in the bar corresponding to the pole of the magnet. After the magnet is removed, the bar retains some respective orientation. Then when you reverse the magnet you are exposing two like poles face to face and thus the magnet just slides right by

But, in x00013's video, the magnets do not slide on the exact same path. Is it realistic that a small magnet would reorient the entire surface of the bar? It also seems odd that several passes of the opposite pole would not re-orient the bar and restore magnetic attraction. No? Yes?

joe_1001101

Quote from: nyctuber on May 19, 2009, 11:22:07 PM
But, in x00013's video, the magnets do not slide on the exact same path. Is it realistic that a small magnet would reorient the entire surface of the bar? It also seems odd that several passes of the opposite pole would not re-orient the bar and restore magnetic attraction. No? Yes?

IMO, no reorientation of the entire bar. This can't be the first time anyone tried N vs. S sliding down aluminum, can it!!!!  ??  No way :)  Time for google.


Joe

nyctuber

Quote from: joe_1001101 on May 19, 2009, 11:31:06 PM
IMO, no reorientation of the entire bar. This can't be the first time anyone tried N vs. S sliding down aluminum, can it!!!!  ??  No way :)  Time for google.


Joe

Have you seen this?

http://www.wolframalpha.com/

markdansie

Mark,

You can say this to OverUnity.com on my behalf.

I remain upset with OverUnity.com

It is never appropriate to be extremely rude to people.  The level of abuse there is too much.

Sterling asked me to post this. I had suggested an appology would be nice.

"Until I hear the they have done something to put a tighter control on inappropriate posts, I will maintain my boycott.

I realize that I tend to be quite harsh myself sometimes, so it is a bit hypocritical of me to expect OverUnity to hold to a higher standard.  But I just feel that the level to which they stooped was wrong."

Sterling

nyctuber

I suppose it being an alloy probably explains it, but Is it significant that magnets appear to be exhibiting Lenz's Law (or just attraction) to this degree on ALUMINUM? I thought Aluminum was normally considered basically magnetically nonreactive. That magnet slid pretty slowly down that aluminum bar.

EDIT: Just realized the topic is eddy currents, about which I know very little. Carry on.