Energy Receiver

[FredWalter]

But let us come back to the basic theme "energy receiver":
Visit for example the webpage of Mr.Thomas Cosby,
http://www.geocities.com/cosbytech/stock.html

Mr. Cosby's website has nothing to do with the 'basic theme "energy receiver"'.

His website has to do with steam engines:

"The present proposal relates to a method and apparatus for reducing the amount of fuel required to perform work in a steam cycle to generate electricity."

I've attached one of his patents to this message.

[Big]

Fred is correct.  That site has nothing to do with the subject.  In fact, it is just another scam site, selling shares and not making a product.

It is amazing how some people can be so gullible.  But strange as that may be, they are also the ones who use a lot of mumbo-jumbo, double-talk and just plain ignorance, willing to believe in anything, desiring to be viewed as an expert and knowing little if anything.

First things first; learn to read and write.  Next, try some things out for yourself.  Gain some experience in life and then start asking questions.  Even if you reach that point, you are still not ready to offer knowledge.

Please go back to the original question.  If you don?t have an answer or a reasonable comment, please don?t contribute.

[lancaIV]

Pardon,but also a solar collector is an energy receiver !
A steam-engine is also an energy-receiver and time-parallel? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?an energy-transformer !
Wo beginnt/endet der kleinste "gemeinsame Nenner" bei den Begriffen:

Perpetuum mobile
Overunity
Energy

The Internet is like an OPEN SKY,we have not to buy or sell something,
we can get information through webpages like freeenergynews(A-Z) and
many others,and normally we are souverign enough to decide about
acceptance or recusing !

"Erst sprechen,dann denken !" oder "Erst denken,dann sprechen !"

Sincerely
? ? ? ? ? ? de Lanca
p.s.:
"Big",where can you find a "scam" potential ?
There is a study of +/-500 companies and their R&D :
from 1911 ideas
         376 became board-projects
         176 became market-introduction
  and    11 became financial success,24 invest pay back and the rest:EEE       

Imagination:"Just an illusion,..."

[Big]

No, that simply is not true.  A steam engine is not an energy receiver.  It is a device that takes out, or utilizes, the energy that has been put into the steam by someone who used another energy source to boil the water.  However, the steam engine may be a part of an energy receiver system.  This is simple physics, and it is an extremely simple concept.

An energy receiver is an energy tap.  It connects with the vast pool of energy that is all around us and allows it to flow freely.  I am obviously looking for useful examples of devices that can tap into that pool and allow us to freely use that source without any other step, except perhaps current conversion of some sort.  We need free electricity, and plenty of it!  I currently use at least 2000 watts continuously, maybe more.  I want more electricity and I want it for free.  I believe that to be a big issue of our century as we are forced to wean ourselves off of oil and coal.

The solar panel qualifies, but it is not very efficient and it is very expensive.  The wind turbine also qualifies, as perhaps do other solar collectors that create steam to run a generator.  (The best design I have found is at http://www.stirlingenergy.com//default.asp  since it is available now, but I suspect that it would be quite expensive.)  But if the system is too complex, it will likely be too expensive to purchase and/or maintain.  I do not call that practical.

While the Internet is a place where there is a free exchange of information, that is not the purpose here, nor the reason for this topic.  I am looking for very specific information in the practical realm.  There must be someone out there that has a device for sale, or knowledge of the subject that can be used now.

[lancaIV]

In the 19.century many great steam-machines/-engines had been
solar heat driven !Parabolic-mirror f.e. as receiver !

It is easy for me to write with orthographical faults,
many posts are written when my Bio-Rhytm "sleeps",
but sometimes it is harder for anybody to argument with facts when
he/she describes "his/her true" !
Please,visit an "Estate library",Wikipedia and other archives,
receive up-to-date knowledge and probably begin with your own
physical experiments-there are also enough e-groups-
and then,but only then let us both discussing about "Earth 2050"
under best or under worst case scene

Sincerely
? ? ? ? ? ? de Lanca
p.s.: 2KW X 8766h(permanent)=? or only because e-heater during cold season? ?
? ? ? ?The average electricity use (not consume)for a 4-Persons-household in FRG:
? ? ? ?4000KWH/year (without room heating)