Dissociation of the Water Molecule

[jibbguy]

Lol it's always about "isolating Hydrogen" to these people (referring to the Doc at UC Santa Cruz). That way a huge infrastructure is always needed to dispense and store it

Current designs of electric fuel cells require 99.999% pure H to operate ("The 5 Nines of Purity"), otherwise they are quickly contaminated. You know, when it is combusted, H doesn't give a damn about the "purity" lol, and when it is created on-demand, it doesn't need any storage

What, no mention of using hydroxy to directly power ICE vehicles? ... It seems there never is with these people (as with the MIT "plasmatron" project) 

Because it appears to be a "forbidden" subject. Once breached, someone might start asking what ever happened to Stanley Meyer, and his technology. Or they might wonder why hydroxy boost hasn't been nationally embraced yet.

Or they may even ask why a major corporation has the power, or right, to keep highly important, clean, and efficient technologies that could greatly benefit the planet from ever seeing the light of day?... I wonder what might become of the public Stock prices, or the Consumer Sales, of such a corporation if it was found that they were shelving such a technology.... Denying the people of its benefits... When they were never elected to anything.... When they are simply corporate executives with no immunity against prosecution or going to jail for illegal Trust activity (lol "Yes", the Federal Anti-Trust laws are still on the books, even if they haven't been used much lately ). 

Perhaps they had better dust it off and make it public before it's too late, and they are caught with it still on the shelf. Timing is everything: Release it now and you are "heroes". Wait to long and you are in Court, and trying to transfer your assets to your Mother-In-Law to keep from losing everything

[Farrah Day]

What, no mention of using hydroxy to directly power ICE vehicles? ... It seems there never is with these people (as with the MIT "plasmatron" project) 

Because it appears to be a "forbidden" subject. Once breached, someone might start asking what ever happened to Stanley Meyer, and his technology. Or they might wonder why hydroxy boost hasn't been nationally embraced yet.

Hardly surprising really as that tends to be the domain of the uneducated and ignorant - dipshit journalists and reporters out for a quick headline with no regard for any science.

So not really sure it's quite a simple as that.

Any educated man worth his salt would not jeapordise his credibility by jumping on the 'water-powered cars' bandwagon, unless they had hard facts to back up such a statement. 

Hydrogen is a fuel. Water on the other hand is only currently a source of fuel. And, as long as it takes more energy to to dissociate water than is returned on combustion this will forever remain so.

You have to consider that the moment anyone actually achieves (beyond doubt) a self-sustaining closed loop hydroxy on-demand system, that this in itself will constitute Over-Unity.

Something of course that many great minds consider impossible!

That said, great minds have been wrong before - take for example Einstein.

[jibbguy]

You just called me a "Dipshit".

I have reported on these technologies many times, and probably a million people have read my articles. I've spent countless hours researching them, and spoke with dozens of people who know much more about these subjects than you pretend to. I stand by my work, and i have defended myself successfully over and over again in "comments" sections against people who make you look like a retard.

Why don't you write an article yourself debunking it all if you feel so passionately about it? But i guess it's much easier to just snidely criticize others. You and your ilk disgust me, and many others here.

... Do us a favor: Give your constant negative comments based only on your WORTHLESS OPINION a rest, and just go to back to dis-ing "cold fusion" or whatever it was you came from.

[newbie123]

Jibbguy,    Are you really  a journalist or reporter  "out for a quick headline with no regard for any science."?

I think you are just being combative here..     Anyway..     What publication do you write for?

[Farrah Day]

You just called me a "Dipshit".

Sorry about that, the comment was not directed at you specifically, but from what followed in your post I obviously greatly underestimated your limited knowledge of science and over estimated your intelligence. 

Perhaps you would find 'ignorant arsehole' to be more agreeable! 

Incidentally, I didn't call you a 'Dipshit', you simply labelled yourself as one of those I was talking about...  But I guess you've unwittingly emphasised my point. Who do you write for... Marvel Comics?