Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Where can we find Radium chloride or Radium source ?

Started by Tito L. Oracion, March 23, 2009, 06:02:33 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

DreamThinkBuild

My neighbor had to have a radon mitigation system put in before she could sell her property.

A tube was placed under the basement floor and a fan pulls it out where it is vented. Could radon be used or excited in anyway for electrical generation on it's way through the tube?


hansvonlieven

G'day Tito L. Oracion and all,

This might be an interesting source of radioactivity. It would appear radioactive elements play an important part in the Testatika design. It uses an unorthodox source. Here is the post. I hope you will find this interesting. I did.

I wish I knew what you are working on :-)

Hans von Lieven


Quote from: f_dyne on March 27, 2009, 09:31:45 PM
I found some data on isotopes.

From here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silicon-29
"Silicon (Si) has numerous known isotopes, with mass numbers ranging from 22 to
44. 28Si (the most abundant isotope, at 92.23%), 29Si (4.67%), and 30Si (3.1%)
are stable; 32Si is a radioactive isotope produced by argon decay. Its half-life
has been determined to be approximately 170 years (0.21 MeV), and it decays by
beta emission to 32P (which has a 14.28 day half-life [1]) and then to 32S. "

then I made some calculations:

32-Si mass=(31,97414808 * proton mass) (Kg)
32-S mass=(31,97207100 * proton mass) (Kg)

Energy release per atom: (32-Si mass - 32-S mass) x C^2
Atoms per cubic meter, full SiO2 quartz crystal: (calculus) = 2,48e28
Energy per cubic meter: 7,74e15 Joule/m3

that is, 7,74e6 Joule/mm3.

This means that if Baumann found 32.Si isotope quartz crystals, he found some
real beta decay nuclear value.

F_dyne
http://xoomer.virgilio.it/fischerconsulting/edgeresearch.htm

You will find this discussed at http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=5421.0;topicseen
When all is said and done, more is said than done.     Groucho Marx

Tito L. Oracion

Quote from: hansvonlieven on March 27, 2009, 10:15:54 PM
G'day Tito L. Oracion and all,

This might be an interesting source of radioactivity. It would appear radioactive elements play an important part in the Testatika design. It uses an unorthodox source. Here is the post. I hope you will find this interesting. I did.

I wish I knew what you are working on :-)

Hans von Lieven


You will find this discussed at http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=5421.0;topicseen

HI SIR GOOD DAY

i just want to try to combine this radioactive element and see if it gives good result in my tpu, cause i'm not satisfied to the power it produce.

thats why i open up this thread to get some good info, and i become more interested with it when i read this info .doc that i attached.


Thank you once again sir  and for everyone who gave some info thank you very much!  ;D

God bless you all
otits



triffid

A electroscope's leaves will close faster when ionizing radiation is present than when its not present.Maybe a simple electroscope can take the place of a more expensive geiger counter?It would be interesting to compare the two side by side.Triffid

jadaro2600

Why on earth would you want to try to build a nuclear reactor ( when we have so much coal )...no j/k.

But seriously?

Radiation destroys things, creates heat - which destroys magnetic fields.  Besides, most radiation is atomic particles at high speed - just incidental mass and heat.