The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"

[supersam]

sorry,

i try to read, and think about every post.  i think you guys posted those maybe when we were having so much trouble all of a sudden going forward, and it seemed to be impossible to go back.  i must have missed it, however it looks to me like ther are some different equations in the article starcruiser posted tonight.  it might be worth taking a look at.

lol
sam

[mikestocks2006]

yes, I had also posted something similar here for the 7.8Hz geofield frequency.

A sample toroid would be:

To get to 7.8 Hz and with use of an external capacitor
An example configuration, calculates
External C approx 39mF
Toroidal radius 10 cm
Coil radius 4 cm
Number of turns 1000
Air core

Whould that do it? Using a permanent magnet to start the first oscillation and then let the geofield take over?

http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,712.msg13840.html#msg13840
and
formulas here
http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,712.msg13779.html#msg13779

Seems like this would be the obvious starting point. That would explain again why when the device is turned sideways 'it don't work'.
The loop is not pointing at the source...
Thanks guys,

Pigs fly!

"The loop is not pointing at the source..."
Exactly! it seems the coils arrangement has a directional amplification orientation to it.

I also think that the toroid is closed and the other coils are used for draining the resonant energy collected in it and power the load
I posted some possible configurations here

http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,712.msg13952.html#msg13952

After looking at one of the videos, the one with the most simple torus about 5" dia placed on the glass table, I thought with the old proven KISS principle the following could be a safe first assumption:

a. a closed loop energy amplification main toroid with a base resonating frequency of 7.4 - 7.8 Hz
b. a number of output (and possibly control) coils that can be
c. inside the energy collection and amplification toroid in different orientations?
   or
d. interwoven with the main toroid
   or
e. some of the output coils are actually part (sections of the toroid/spliced wires)
   or
f. some combination of the above

I was thinking closed end toroid since it appears to be self powering.
with possibility (e) one will actually remove current directly from the source without physically introducting another coil inside?
Just thinking out loud.

Thanks folks for a very interesting thread. Nice links, pics, info.

BTW, giantkiller you are right, in matter of speech, pigs do fly.  When Boeing engineers first came up with the 747 design, there were huge doubts from many of them and just about all management that the plane would fly as it would be too heavy at take off. And yet it became the most successful volume carrier ever built

[supersam]

stephan,
WHY ALL OF THE SUDDEN DO WE HAVE TO WAIT 30-45 SECONDS, WITH A HIGH SPEED DSL CONECTION FOR, "BANNERS", WHEN THE SAME BANNERS ARE BEING POSTED ON EVERY PAGE.  THIS JUST DOESN'T MAKE GOOD COMMON WALK ABOUT SINCE!!!!!  ESPECIALLY SINCE I HAVE BEEN FOLLOWING THIS THREAD SINCE ABOUT PAGE 10.  I KNOW BETTER!!!!! WHAT EVER YOU HAVE CHANGED CAN YOU PLEASE CHANGE IT BACK.  IT HAS DRIVEN YOUR WEB SITE INTO THE DIALUP AGE OR BEYOND!!!!!

MIKESTOCK, AND GIANTKILLER,

if you can go back to the mannix post somewhere around page 315, where steven has sent him the letter from the college professor that looked at and tested his machines it gives us the measurements of the outside demensions of the coils, possibly we can now begin to make some since of it.  i think what is happening is a lot of stuff may be getting dropped through the cracks because of all the delays in navigating the sight and in the time it takes to post.  i think alot of posts are getting scrambled.

in other words, guys i didn't mean to miss the posts you sent and was acctually posting at the time.  if that is the case if i got the prompt that someone else had posted, IWOULD HAVE GONE BACK TO SEE WHAT I MISSED.  but i never saw those posts.  the closest thing i saw was someone that had caluculated the size of the 7.8Hz antenna to be several meters in diameter and another post by i think tao that refered to another sight where it was pointed out that the size could be greatly reduced by adding current. 

i think if someone can now go back or has already saved the post location of the mannix post, with the letter to steven, then we might be able to make a good enough guess as to how to wind a coil to maybe get in the ballpark, and with a little tuning or balancing maybe, someone will get lucky or smart.

lol

sam

ps:
keep up the good work.

[supersam]

dave,

GET UM!!!!!!!!

LOL
SAM

ps:did i miss another post where stephan explained why his whole sight seems to be crashing?

[supersam]

dave,

here, when you tell your badest "DOG",  GETUM! that means for whoever is out there,  "WATCHOUT", when you tell your , badest dog, "ANNNNT", that means he better not do it!!!!

please don't take this the wrong way.  i live in BULLDOG country.

i still think you are on the right path.  i am starting to think you might be on to something more than you think.  at least if we can put two and two together still.

lol
sam