The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"

[dean_mcgowan]

author=dean_mcgowan
I still have the concern here, to draw an analogy, that capacitors resistor etc.. are digital technoloy compared to analog, in the sense that you may view a capacitor as a means to quantify the effect in a time scale that is observable and hence measurable in the four dimension of space time. ie simply varying the juncture in my simplified diagram of the two circuits would both balance the mass and frequency of the circuit and hence afford tuning of the circuit. Applying the spark gap has merrit though it also is very hard to maintain a specific qualatitive amount of energy across the gap and could be more disruptive than productive in this paradigm.

Regards,

Dean McGowan

What a load of crap.

Capacitance, inductance and resistance are present in all wires to varying degrees.
By this very fact capacitors, coils and resistors are ANALOG to suggest otherwise is tripe. DIGITAL my arse.
It is the infinite non-step like features of analog circuits that make them so suitable for the task at hand.
One of the reasons why eletron tubes would be far more suitable because they allow far more harmonics to progress around an analog circuit.

You may be able to tune your coils to a particular resonant frequency without an additional capacitor but this doesn't mean there is no capacitance in your circuit. Capacitance introduced by your choice of insulation between layers; distance apart of the turns; diameter of wire; size of coil; choice of former; tension on the wire; precision in winding etc.

It's already well understood that fast rise and fall times along with short impulse times coupled with a circuit that never allows reversal of current (diode operation) are required to generate radiant energy. It is more than clear from Tao's work and confirmation from Steven Mark that this is the direction to take.

A spark gap is a good initial choice because it has the attributes of incredibly fast rise time and fall time, and provides a high voltage diode action, and a switching action. By definition if voltage could be applied instantly to the wire the harmonics would continue on into infinity. High voltage capacitors by definition are able to present large amounts of charge to a wire via an appropriate switch.

It is precisely these very high frequency harmonics that we are after in our coil circuits as it is the interaction of these frequencies that can then be observed and deductions made on the right combination of frequencies to use to achieve the desired result.

You'll note from the comments by Lindsay Mannix that they are looking for appropriate switching mechanisms. Fast rise times are not the problem. It's the fast fall times that is the issue. MOSFETS only go to around 1500V. IGBTs go to much higher voltages but have much lower switching times because their trailing edge keeps going - the current doesn't shut off smoothly.

Like I was saying earlier your purpose here is to waste time, detract and misdirect.

[dean_mcgowan]

maybe there are three coils?

    ////////////---
---|||||||||||   }---
    ////////////---

top and bottom connected in series and middle rapped around at 90 degrees as illustrated previously

hi,

I do use 3 coils but they are wrapped over each other so there isnt a coil inside a coil.

But i dont switch them into paralel nor in series becase im using 2 seperate input channels  and one (lets say middle) coil as output.

Its just so that i can run both coils (Async) against each other to see what comes out of coil 3

I wil see if i can get a camera somewhere for some pics.

greets marco.

[dean_mcgowan]

just revisiting some earlier posts to see if they are again relative ...

[dean_mcgowan]

tao,

I think we are seing things come full circle back to the much more simple interpretations of the SM device.

I did a few experiments with small coils in a transmitter reciever feedback loop earlier on and got nominal effects , tested by touching on my tongue .. lol .. but still, induced current no doubt. These were only tiny effects and could have been ascribed to inductance. But my gut is telling me Marco is on the money !!!

[dean_mcgowan]

Another more natural way of creating the switching may be simply inducing a feedback loop in the circuit that has a natural phase cancellation thus opening and closing the loop allowing for the natural capacitance and voltage multiplication to self regulate. I thought this made sense when considering the system based on longitudinal waveforms. This diagram is crude but let me know what you think?

I have 2 small ring magnets wound seperately using a single steel wire and an iron core wound with copper wire.

The mass of the 2 seperate circuits is the same and I have brought into contact a small neodymium magnet to the copper wound iron core. Results .. inconclusive, too small a scale to make any validatable observations, though It did seem to be totally ineffective when the device was not in the upright position.

    ___________
   |\|              |
////////           |
   |\| |--------|---------|
////////                         |
   |\|                         load
   |\|_________________|

This is my interpretation of the system however I have deviated from the Steven Marks device as I considered that the copper winding is around the outside of the circuit, however this may only be an issue of semantics.

I put this forward as I am of the opinion that efforts may be being made on non essential components as often included/excluded in demonstrations and patents for such devices. I also accept this may be an over simplification of the device.


Regards,

Dean McGowan