The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"

[lancaIV]

Each magnet symbolizises the vortex-effect,"Wirbel,Strudel,Spirale" !

Sincerely
? ? ? ? ? ? de Lanca

p.s.: The magnet gives the same graphical image like the (plasma) fusion process,why ?

[not_a_mib]

The exploding TV might have been tuned to some program that really sucked, such as "The Waltons." ;-)
This would account for the material drawn toward the set.  That show has produced anomalous TV receiver
behavior in at least one other case, the David Hamel account. 
http://www.rense.com/general58/UFOencounterfuels30yr.htm

Do these ring devices work inside a closed metal enclosure? (Faraday cage)
Possible experiment:  start a ring + bulb out in the open, then slowly lower it into a nonferrous metal barrel,
then finally put a metal cap atop it to form a closed shell.  If the energy source is nonlocal, the
device should shut down, probably even before it fully enters the barrel.

If the energy source is truly local, it might keep running inside the sealed enclosure.  In this state, it might do
something unusual to the space within the enclosure such as:  (clueless newbie speculations...)
1.  Changing the physical constants of the space, such as lightspeed, permittivity, and permeability.
2.  Making crushing or bulging forces on the enclosure walls, would expect crushing from simple "ZPE pressure" idea.
3.  Change in weight, would expect loss.
Calorimetry might be revealing, a local system might have exactly zero net heat production or absorption.

A possible transformer anomaly is the Poynting vector near one.  Consider a simple nearly-ideal transformer
consisting of a nonconductive toroidal (donut shaped) high-permeability core, with small primary and secondary
windings of a few turns each  on opposite sides of the core.  The secondary is connected to a load and the primary
to an AC source by two-wire "lamp cord" style transmission lines.  Now look at the Poynting vector
P = ExH in a few places.  It is supposed to represent a flow of energy and momentum ("stuff") as carried by the
fields.  E is the electric field, H the magnetic "intensity," which is just the magnetic field with a scale factor.
Magnetic flux density or field B
Magnetic "intensity" H
Permeability u (should be Greek mu, but I have an Ugly American (Yankistani) keyboard)
B = uH, for ideal core, u is very large, for air, u is small.

Between the wires of the lamp cord, one sees E directed between the wires, and H perpendicular to E, so P points
down the wires toward the load as expected, "stuff" is oozing down the gap between the wires, leaving the
AC source and eventually entering the load.

Now look between turns of the primary winding.  E is directed between the turns, in nearly the same direction as H.
Also H is present inside the winding, but should largely vanish outside it.  The P vector seems to quietly vanish
into the winding.  The secondary winding is similar.

Now look inside the core material away from the windings.  H is directed along the core, E loops around it,
so P "throbs" in and out normal to the core surface.  Just outside the core material, H mostly vanishes, so P
should also, giving a discontinuity at the core surface.  (The equivalent "surface current" from magnetic domains
in the core may account for this, acting as a source and sink.)  In the space outside the core and windings,
P is largely absent.

There does not seem to be a P flux crossing the space between the windings, no transport of "stuff".  In a
strongly-coupled transformer, the fields inside the core do not change very much when the load is changed,
the fields do not seem to reflect the energy flow through the transformer.  How does the "stuff" get from
one winding to the other?  (I am probably missing something really obvious here, I haven't quite got the
hang of this electric stuff yet.)

[hartiberlin]

>If the radio signal is too strong the radio receiver might be overloaded and distortion or
>other bad effects will take place. By tuning slightly off frequency we can weaken the
>signal the radio is receiving >and amplify and produce the sound for entertainment purposes.
>However, the music will not be of high quality. The music will be lacking in response and timbre, etc.

>OK let us compare this story of the common radio.
>Think of the power unit as a device similar to a radio receiver.
>No I do not want to hear feed back informing me that I am trying
>to convince the world my unit works on radio waves!!!.
>But it behaves very much like a simple radio receiver except for the fact
>that radio waves need to be amplified before they can be of any use to us.
>My units behave as though they are variable tuning devices, and we are tuning
>them to a frequency just like a radio. The closer you get to the center frequency
>the more power you permit the collector >to dissipate into a load.

I see, until here this all relates to a resonance condition for LC circuits.



>the important difference here is that in the case of the radio, you tune into the frequency and amplify it for use.
>In the case of my power unit, you create several frequencies within a space of the
>collector coil's circumference. The frequencies are directly related to the circumference of the collector coil.

Now this is the most interesting part.
This means that you must supply the right frequencies to the coils
that match their physical shape and length ?
Or does it just depend also of the used length of the circumference of the core ?



>You can begin to collect the current and dissipate it with no need for amplification because
>the signal source also becomes the feed for the power source and has the natural tendency to run with gain.?

So the signal source sees no load in this setup , if you draw a few hundred Watts out ofthe collector coil ?


>It is important that you note that you can never tune too closely to the exact frequencies of
>power conversion because the power received by the collector will instantly destroy it.
>We instead must >deliberately tune off the frequencies of conversion in order to make
>the thing properly work. Remember that it is like a furnace which feeds itself.
>The hotter it gets the more fuel it gives itself to burn. >that is why the control
>units are so very important. Without the control unit constantly monitoring the
>frequencies of operation and making the necessary changes to keep the
>whole thing off exact >conversion frequency, then the unit would very quickly destroy it's self.

Okay, this makes sense and is the bridge that? collapsed due to much wind excitation and was destroyed this way... That is just a resonance catastropy.


>By the way, have you seen the video of the compass turning violently in the center of the unit while in operation?

No, I don?t know this. Does Lindsay has a video tape of it he could post ?



> Notice that when I first turn the unit on that the compass starts to spin very slowly.
>it >speeds up faster and faster until it just stops.
>When it stops the unit is always operating at about it's design >maximum.
>We never found out why any of this occurred. It tended to reinforce what I observed as the turbine effect.
>When the unit is shut off the compass starts to revolve again and slowly comes to >a rest.

Hmm, maybe the freqency gets just too fast for the mechanical compass to follow it.
Then the compass needle stalls and gets to a rest at too high frequencies.
As the frequency comes down, the compass needle can again catch up and
restarts and slows down in sync with the singnal source.

Now, my most important question is:
Does the frequency run up controlled by your control circuit or is it due to some kind
of selfresonance and/or? your "current kick" inductions ?

If we go from a 4 coils on a toroid core spinning field like this
http://harti.com/coil/toroid_gen.gif

how is this? frequency windup done? ?
Is this done via your control circuit ?

On the contrary: If we would wind 4 normal coils onto a toroidal core and just use a 4 x 90 degrees phase driver to
drive it this way, that it keeps the flux inside the core, a compass needle would not move inside
the core center,cause the whole flux stays inside the core, so the setup must really by like in
http://harti.com/coil/toroid_gen.gif
where the flux comes out of the core cause 2 coil pairs always repell the flux out of the core...





>By the way, the fire discharge everyone sees in the video is after the output of the device is
>switched through a large high value resister! I hope that will wake up a few of you to the danger potentials.

Yes,there must be quite some power behind it as you can also see, that it can light about 8 to 10 x 100 Watt bulbs, so
so around 1 KWatt power from it from this small converter is pretty powerful....!





>Stefan is quite correct about the amount of power necessary to pull the nails out of the
>walls during the GE color television explosion in Chicago. Actually? Dr. Schinzinger
> told me that it would have >required much more power then that.


Yes,I can imagine this.
Is there any more info about this accidebt on the web available ?
Maybe we can study the circuit diagramm of this special TV set and see, when one
component fails, what could then happen ?

Did the tv electron-beam yoke, which reflects the elecron beam become
a rotating toroid converter ?
I could only imagine, that this unit, which normally also sits on
some kind of core was running away in frequency and might have catched up
the right frequencies which are required to get such a selfresonating state ?

I wonder, why it could then produce the huge magnet fields and did? not
smoke up earlier before it reached 100 Teslas or more
to pull out the nails from the walls ?

Normally the coils would have already burnt up, when they have produced
1 Tesla or less if too high current would have passed through them...



>We theorized that the TV set must have become for a split second, a
>power unit very similar in operation to one of my own making.
>Except for the fact that it wouldn't have been designed to collect >and convert the available power in a useful way.
>Instead, the TV just stumbled for one millisecond on the correct combination of
>frequencies necessary to cause the phenomenon of magnetic collection.
>But unfortunately the TV set had no way to control the function and began to absorb and
>discharge both the electric and magnetic factors caused by the influence of the strong field.

Hmm, I guess ithas needed more than a few milliseconds to remove the nails from the wall...
This is just all speculation only ....We just don?t know and an exact? report is not available...



>It was during this discussion with Dr. Schinzinger that he pointed out that during an atomic explosion aside from the gigantic
>blast wave and heat produced there is also an extremely large magnetic force which is so strong that it travels way out
>into space during the explosion. The magnetic wave is so strong that it will >completely destroy any
>unprotected electronic circuits of solid state design. That is why solid state radios will be useless
>after an nuclear attack on your country. Let us ponder where the huge magnetic field comes from
>when you explode an atomic bomb. It is just created? Is it converted? Is it part of the earth somehow?
>Is it just a by product of the fabric of time and space being ripped into pieces in a fragment of a second?
> I am curious as to where this unbelievably huge magnetic force comes from during an atomic explosion...
>It is something else to think about. perhaps in connection with my power technology. Dr. Schinzinger
> said that it is explained as being the result of the splitting of the atom.
>However, that is a very short explanation and not really a satisfactory explanation of what
>generates the force. He agreed with me and said it would also mean that in reality we
> know very little about magnetic fields and magnetic property.

Hmm, yes, interesting, but I am now more confused as before.
Now is the control circuit winding up the frequencies or is this done by selfresonation or what is going on there ?
And how are the coils wound onto the core and must the core? be magnetic itsself like a ferrit core or is itreally a cork core ?

And what does it have to do with the earth magnetic field giving a kick to the currents ?

I rather would firstly like to have a basic experiment, where we can prove, that the magnet field
of the earth can really work as a negative resistance and propell the electrons in a circuit...
this is what you first claimed was the propelling source of your circuit.

Many thanks.

Regards, Stefan.

[Freedomfuel]

Deleted

[Elvis Oswald]

I've gone over this thread more than once, and maybe I'm missing something. 

But before I read one more post waxing-poetic about the little engine who could... haha (no offense) I would like to see some actual power come out of the device. 
I've seen voltage - but anyone can transform 60v out of a weak source.  Where are the ampheres?
The gyroscopic effect?  It's spinning.  So?

I can understand hiding the design... though I wouldn't hide anything... but I cannot understand the length of this discussion about a device that has not been clearly shown to produce real power.

This forum is made up of many different types of people.  There are engineers who think in formulas and specifics (show me a drawing!) and there are people like me, who are abstract thinkers, who perceive with abstract thought.  But we all have the same goal (hopefully) and that is to deliver power to the people for free.

I understand that when a device shows *promise* the tendancy is to try and decide how it might work and to start calculating... and I think sometimes the engineers get so focused on the math that they cannot see the forest for the trees.  This leaves it to the ones who think, not just 'outside the box', but abstractly - to say, "Shit - or get off the pot!"

We all appreciate the time people take to share their experiments and their knowledge.  But showing me a fuzzy video of a device and a voltmeter that reads 60v is just not enough to make me waste one second of time on wondering how it works.

Is there really one person here who couldn't make a box with a gyroscope in it that would have 60v left over?  At least for the amount of time that we've seen this thing work?

Geez.