The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"

[Mannix]

Hi all,
Just recieved this.
Roland Schinzinger
PhD.
29 Gilman St. Irvine, CA 92715-2703, Phone & FAX: (714) 786-7691

December 1, 1995

Dear Steven,

Thank you for dinner the other night. I truly enjoyed the experience and the ride home together. Thank you for sharing your thoughts.

When you get to be my age Stephen you have learned how not to ruffle feathers. If I were in your shoes I would do exactly what we discussed.

I have talked to my associate about the problems as you see it involving the heat created by your unit when generating power. He is willing to assist us in finding a solution and he does not feel it is an insurmountable problem.

The current involved no matter how slight must be a contributing factor, regardless. We must first consider all the working principles and decide how to go about solving the problem.

I look forward to seeing you and your unit at my laboratory around eight thirty on Saturday morning.

I will have only one observer and we will be otherwise alone.
I promise you that we will give an honest evaluation of everything we observe and will attest to what we find.

If you need to talk to me first you may leave a message for me at my office at the University of California Irvine.

Sincerely,

Roland
...............
and this.................................
..............


Roland Schinzinger
PhD.
29 Gilman St. Irvine, CA 92715-2703, Phone & FAX: (714) 786-7691


Second report on Energy Device

At the request of Steven Mark I agreed to thoroughly test his invention of an energy device â€Ã...“toroidâ€Ã, at my laboratory at the UCI campus.
With me was John Sanchez who will act as an observer and Mr. Mark who will operate his device for the tests.

The device is reported to develop measurable amounts of electric power beyond any known battery or storage device. In fact the inventor claims that his device will create electric power indefinitely as long as it is permitted to cool at intervals.

Mr. Mark arrived promptly at 8:30 AM and wasted no time in permitting my examination of two units.
The first unit was roughly shaped like a large donut. It measured approximately 4.72â€Ã, across with an inside diameter hole of 3â€Ã, making a core width approximately 1â€Ã, thick
The unit was exactly 2â€Ã, tall, resembling a â€Ã...“Toroidâ€Ã,. I did not measure the weight however the unit was extremely light when held in the hand.

Mr. Mark connected the unit directly to a 100 watt 120 volt incandescent light bulb and caused the unit to operate. It did in fact illuminate the incandescent bulb quite brightly. I measured the voltage at 137 volts D.C. exactly, (ObS). See note*
I then measured the current flowing through the wires to the bulb at a steady one-ampere, (ObS).
We noted the time at 9:06 AM.,(ObS).
We next measured the light output from the bulb with a luminescence meter and noted that it read2.5, (ObS). Next we measured a similar incandescent bulb placed in a socket powered from the main 120 volt (as measured) AC power provided to the laboratory. It measured 2.4 on the luminescence meter. This can probably be accounted for because the voltage as measured from the Toroid device is 137 volts and therefore 12 volts greater, generating a slight increase in light output over the incandescent light powered by the laboratory main power supply system.
The toroid device did indeed provide the standard voltage and current necessary to provide electric lighting for a 120-volt circuit.
The inventor then asked us for another bulb, which we provided him and he set about connecting the second bulb along with the first.
The second bulb was connected in parallel to the first and did indeed light just as brightly as the first.
I measured 137 volts now across the output just as before although the load had doubled and the impedance halved (ObS).
I measured the current flowing to the two bulbs at just less then 2-amperes, (ObS).
The inventor stated that the unit would provide the two amperes at 137 volts for several hours, if not indefinitely. We were cautioned that the unit while in operation would generate heat leading to self-destruction if not shut down and permitted to cool. He claimed that after cooling the unit could be restarted and used again over and over.
We permitted the first unit to remain in operation and provide power for the two incandescent bulbs while we turned our attention to the second larger unit the inventor brought with him for testing.

The second unit was again toroid shaped with a large hole in the center. It was approximately 15â€Ã, at the outside and 13 â€Ã...“ inside with a core thickness of approximately 1â€Ã,.  The unit was 4â€Ã, tall. The unit was not measured in weight but could be easily lifted with one hand, (ObS).

The inventor started the second larger unit in operation and cautioned myself and Mr. Sanchez not to touch the output leads from the device as they were at lethal potential. The time was 9:39 AM.
The inventor measured the output leads and told us there was 600 volts potential at several amperes.
He connected the unit to five 120 volt 100 watt incandescent light bulbs as provided by myself. The larger second unit did indeed brightly light the five incandescent bulbs brightly. These bulbs were wired in series.
I measured the current through the wire connected to the 5-bulbs at 1.1 ampere, (ObS). I measured the voltage at 614 volts D.C., (ObS).

The inventor then connected another five 120 volt light bulbs along with the first five making a total of ten 120 volt, 100 watt incandescent light bulbs lighting at equal intensity.
I measured the light output with a luminescence meter at 2.43 each light bulb, (ObS). I did not measure the current but calculated it to be 2 amperes at 614 volts.
I asked the inventor if this was the limit of the unit and he replied, â€Ã...“by no way.â€Ã,
He provided a quick blow fuse rated at 50 amperes.
With two large electrical clamps and wiring, he shorted the fuse across the output terminals of the toroid and destroyed the fuse, (ObS). There was only a slight flickering of the ten incandescent bulbs as observed although there was a tremendous discharge of sparks from the output terminals of the toroid unit.
The inventor then gave me the fuse for examination. It was warm to the touch and smelled acrid, (ObS). It was a large 240 volt AC air conditioner disconnect fuse and designed for severe service duty, (OsS).
The inventor’s claim that the large toroid output terminals were at lethal potential was no longer in question.

The time was 11:20 AM when the inventor removed the small toroid unit from operation because of heat build up.
I examined the small toroid unit and it was indeed quite hot to the touch.

The unit had been in steady operation for exactly two hours and fourteen minutes.  Noted: 2-hours and 14 minutes, (ObS).

The load of 2- amperes at 137-volts did not change through the test period.

I can personally state that I do not know of any battery or storage device of this size or weight with this capability.


The time was 12:47 when the inventor removed the large toroid device from operation.
It had been in constant operation for three hours and eight minutes.
Noted: 3-hours and 8 minutes, (ObS).

The load of 10-amperes and the voltage of 614 volts did not change throughout the test with the exception that the voltage did began to fluctuate at 12:03 and began a slight decline to 598 volts by the end of the test. This could be due to heating of the unit while in operation.

I can personally state that I do not know of any battery or storage device of this size or weight with this capability.

I cannot determine how many hours the toriod units could potentially operate because of our limited time available for testing.
I can however state with relative certainty I believe the tests show great potential for this Toroid technology.



December 12, 1995                                                      Roland Schinzinger

[HMM]

Hey Tao

have a look here: http://www.keelynet.com/energy/device.htm

Aerial Power Tap Experiment

courtesy of Terry Berger

Mike

[otto]

Hello all,

tao

I?m looking at your pictures and the second reminds me on my TPU!
Today I?ll try to close one of the collector coils so I?ll have one closed ring and the coils (two of them) around the ring will be pulsed. I think it will be interesting to see what will happen.

Regards

Otto

[gn0stik]

Thanks Mannix, good information there, seems the device may be even more powerful than we expected. No upper limit to their operation has been discovered, at least in the tests we have seen! Voltage stayed the same, and current ROSE under progressively larger loads. That is AMAZING.

Thanks for that post mate... Keep it up.

[c0mster]

Things are really heating up here. Last night I was doing some testing with my ferrite core see http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,712.msg13486.html#msg13486 post for the description of the core setup. I connected A1 to negative and then skipped A2 continued the negative through A3 and A4 at the end of A4 I connected the positive. I connected my listing device to B3 to listen to the signal in the secondary coil. I pulsed the negative on A1 with a 555 driving an npn transistor. I noticed at certain frequencies I could hear something slowing down. Like a hum when it seem to stop moving I got the best measurements. This is what I got: The circuit was using 10ma to drive the coil on the core I connected the A2 coil to the amp meter through a diode --|>--, the amp meter showed 29ma. When I connected the amp meter to A2 the sound changed, became sharper. Now I connected a 6v 75ma light in between the positive driving A1-A4 and I also connected a 6v 75ma light to the A2 coil. The light on A2 lit about half brightness and the light between the driver did not light at all. I then placed a resistor in place of the driver light and also placed a resistor of the same on the A2 coil. The driving resistor showed 1.2 volts across the resistor but the second resistor on A2 only showed .8 volts. Thus looks like I am still using more watts to drive the circuit than I am getting out  . What surprised me was that all my BEMF tests have never shown a 3x gain in ma, nor have I seen a 3x gain in ma when using 2 coils wrapped on a ferrite rod. Keep on keeping on folks.

C0mster