Sjack Abeling Gravity Wheel and the Worlds first Weight Power Plant

[i_ron]

Before you understand that these two torques are equal it's impossible to continue the discussion.

Omni, I really like you but I am concerned at the time you put into writing your nearly 3 thousand posts now.  Just a suggestion but I have made up a code sheet for you and from now on all you would have to do is write in a number, eg: 1,
or if it called for stronger language, 1,5, 10. See how much
time this would save you? Here is a first draft...

1)   you are wrong

2)   you are completely wrong

3)   your are clearly wrong

4)   your post is irrelevant

5)   with an IQ of less than 70 you should not use
          big words,  the meaning of which is beyond you

6)   you know nothing of this subject

7)   your post shall be ignored

   what I say is the only correct answer

9)   it is right because I say so

10)   you are absolutely wrong

Cheers, Ron

[Omnibus]

Yeah, these are applicable sometimes and should be clearly stated. What's with numbering them and putting them together in one post?

[Omnibus]

Funny how some people have a chip on their shoulder and don’t hide it. Where is the list of the correct concepts, such as @eisenficker2000’s, for example, or, most importantly of the fact that perpetuum mobile has been proved real beyond a shadow of a doubt? Well, human psychology, what can I say …

Now the struggle is to have a nice little AutoLISP routine to calculate the torques automatically. Not only this would avoid the tedious job of decomposing vectors and other calculations but also will increase accuracy. We need this to be able to quantify the effect more accurately and to optimize the design for maximizing the output so that it can overwhelm the friction.

[Cloxxki]

Omni, I really like you but I am concerned at the time you put into writing your nearly 3 thousand posts now.  Just a suggestion but I have made up a code sheet for you and from now on all you would have to do is write in a number, eg: 1,
or if it called for stronger language, 1,5, 10. See how much
time this would save you? Here is a first draft...

1)   you are wrong

2)   you are completely wrong

3)   your are clearly wrong

4)   your post is irrelevant

5)   with an IQ of less than 70 you should not use
          big words,  the meaning of which is beyond you

6)   you know nothing of this subject

7)   your post shall be ignored

8 )   what I say is the only correct answer

9)   it is right because I say so

10)   you are absolutely wrong

Cheers, Ron

Might I suggest alternate wordings to each of the numbered statements, to enhance the tone in this topic's discussions?

1) Your interpretation of the facts seems to, on some accounts, differ from mine
2) It seems most probable that you and yours truly have been using different sources to come to our hypothoses.
3) My notes imply different facts than your's, judging from your latest contribution
4) My dear friend in science, it seems you're wandering away from the main topic of our discussion.
5) We seem to be affected by a harmless case of language barrier. Please let me re-state my opinions and findings.
6) I have consoderable experience in this field, and would gladly grant you an intership to further add to your already considerable knowledge.
7) Your latest contributions might best be reviewed and considered to be re-written to more accurately represent your research.
8 )After reviewing my notes multiple times from various appraoches, I have not been able to find the obviously existing error on my part.
9) I would appreciate it dearly, if you were so kind to, in order to be able to advance with our discussion, to consider the option that my claims may hold some unexpected merit.
10) Let us conceign to compare our notes and sources. There seems to be a slight difference between them, and being able to pin-point it can only contribute to the world of science for both the near and far future.

[Omnibus]

@Cloxxki,

I didn't know this forum is a United Nations summit to negotiate nuclear disarmament.