Was Bessler for real?

[lancaIV]

'copyright'-inventor ?
The risk :  Plagiatscanner

The today 120 000 000 ideas applications in the ' patent archive' !
95% from the patent archive applications 2023 now licence-/fee free for use available !

The multi-millions ' non comercial' dissertations in archives ( Promotion,Habilitation) !
dissertations = patents ,the one for individual  hono(u)r,the other for comercial profit

So a ' copyright work' can often end in tribunals,when not ' idea priority '  from published ideas,worldwide and timeless, is cleared !
"' Appropriation of another's work under one's own name." ,also called robbery !
Arbitrary: fake

Claiming a right is the second step,the first step,as seeker its obligation ,the re-/search :
   is there a free - new - individual right available ,as free - not individual or public ownership - claim ?

wmbr
OCWL

[onepower]

iancaiv

The today 120 000 000 ideas applications in the ' patent archive' !
95% from the patent archive applications 2023 now licence-/fee free for use available !

The multi-millions ' non comercial' dissertations in archives ( Promotion,Habilitation) !
dissertations = patents ,the one for individual  hono(u)r,the other for comercial profit

Your confusing the issue, you cannot patent an idea or an idea for an invention only a real invention. The invention must be of a patentable subject matter, novel, useful and non-obvious. You cannot patent an idea or a scientific discovery only an invention based on an idea, keyword "invention".

So a ' copyright work' can often end in tribunals,when not ' idea priority '  from published ideas,worldwide and timeless, is cleared !
"' Appropriation of another's work under one's own name." ,also called robbery !
Arbitrary: fake

Your confusing the issue again. We cannot copyright another persons idea only our own original or artistic expressions of an idea.

The concept of copyright is brilliant, somewhere an artist just took $10 worth of paint and spread it on a $20 canvas and created a million dollar painting. The buyer isn't paying a million dollars for $30 worth of materials, there paying for the idea and artistry that went into making the painting. Of course, any dullard/business person could try and sell copies but they will never be a true artist.

What you seem to have trouble understanding is that there are some people who are actually original, imaginative and creative. They don't need others ideas and can create there own like a true artist. It's only the people with no imagination or creativity who are trying to convince others were all the same in my opinion.

AC

[lancaIV]

Clearly You ,as inventor case,are expressing ever an idea ,as individual solution/result !

There are different kinds of patents= publications and their - new,temporary monopole,right kind claims :
A trademark,logo,signature

A model design,concret and/or abstract

An utility model
A technical standart

Since some decades information software and new artificial biocell cultures or artificial R-/D-NA!


A thinking model = idea(up to : near,same Ideal/Maxime ) ,worse or good

For the given example -paint/canvas/million-  : not the ( un-/known)  artist makes this comercial value ,but the mainstream media circus !
Da Vinci ' Salvator mundi ' has probably 50 € material input value,but it is sold for more,10⁶+ times more !
Circus,Circus :

https://www.lovezoo.de/aktionen/592-gemaelde-vom-orang-utan-ramon.html
Orang-Utan Ramon paints ' rosa momentum phase ' , cheaper than a da Vinci painting !
Copyright included ?

In the 60ees Hanna Bekker vom Rath,galery-ownership, offered many paintings from ' entartete Artisten',Chagal/Picasso/Miro et cet.each for today +- 1000-5000 € value,which are now sold each for million !
Circus,Circus !
wmbr
OCWL