MylowHJ Replication - Discussion

[lostcauses10x]

TK I have watched this saga for some time.
The game here appears to be using the fields to cause an offset in the normal balance.
Even the new set up is the placement of them stators to be clipping the fields of the stator magnets. Notice in the original he is using a close game. Three rotor magnets to his stator magnet: or three poles two two. Now he uses the stator as the three to his group of rotor magnets.
I am not sure how to put what I am trying to say:

It is a game of the push pulls reacting to were the normal game of out is equal to in.
In theory he is getting an increase in velocity out of the set that over comes the in of the next, or reversed of what I said.

My problem with this whole thing is there would need to be a delay for such to work. I see no way one can be done in this, short of them magnets doing a full disconnect in field from the normal.  This thing as shown would work only due to both sides of the magnets interacting with the other set. 
I could be wrong. Yet no replications and no independent observer.  Both are bad for Mylow. LOL I still do not see or find a way such could be replicated.

He needs to stop trying to prove it is not a fake (motor or other device) and get down to how it works, if it does.
Pay attention to the one show of stator arm. It does appear a line all the way down the aluminum bar on one side, like a wire, or other mark.  Just some thing that makes me go HMMM.
As for OCPMM or WM
"let me repeat, has been independently replicated and has shown reduced rundown friction. Correct me if I'm wrong, please...":
I will personally verify this part.

[vonwolf]

Now, I meant to address the replication issue earlier but I forgot (my how I ramble.) I could produce an exact replication down to the fraction of a millimeter and a tenth of a Gauss, and if it did NOT work, it would still NOT disprove MyLOW. That's the difficulty with this work. What is necessary is to get one's hands on a working unit, by whatever means necessary (ie simulate it if nothing else) and then determine, by careful experimentation, why it does work and how to break it. OTOH, one can definitely apply logic and critical thinking, and see if what is claimed, is consistent internally and externally. It is here that MyLOW's story fails, and until he provides us with a working model to test, or has it tested independently, or one of us hits the (nonexistent, I maintain) jackpot, we can't really go much further.
[/quote/]

T/k;
   You left out Wash & Wax your Car, Simonize your Furniture and Mow Your Lawn.

[dixiepnum]

in case all you home replicators who don't own a machine shop didn't notice this on yahoogroups,

www.atecousa.net

aluminium rotating cake pan 60$ includes ball bearings and heavy-duty base...

have fun!

[wattsup]

@vonwolf

Mylow just showed you a device that just saved you 30 years of R&D. I think that is a pretty good head start. I'll take that any day.

@TK

There is a difference between a Replicator and a new term I will coin as "Replifaker". So which one are you now. This thread is for the guys that will be building this device and those that wish to honestly collaborate.

@nyctuber

Sorry but you are not welcome here as you will soon be banned from this topic entirely. Please refrain from posting here.

@all

ANY POT SHOTS AT MYLOW WILL BE REMOVED. That's it you guys.
This thread is for guys that have MADE THE DECISION TO BUILD THIS WHEEL. We are not asking ourselves, is this real or not. You have no business here if this is your main concern or if you are waiting for Mylow to have it third party tested, then please wait somewhere else. Any more mention of this and your post will be removed. Enough time has been WASTED. Or do you not understand what a builders thread really is. 

@all

I just ordered four ceramic bearings for my wheel. It took a long while to find them in Texas. lol

OK, if there are any guys out there that have good experience in inertia motion considerations, we need to understand something about Mylows wheel.

OK his wheel has,
1) rotors
2) the aluminum disk
3) A center support disk about 3" dia.  by 1/2" thick under item No. 2.
4) A cylinder that is 2" dia. by about 3"-4" long that is under item No. 3 and has a bearing inside the bottom end.
5) A base that is about 3" dia. by 1/2" thick that has a center protrusion going into the bearing bore hole.
6) 1 is secured to 2 on the outer edge.
7) 2 and 3 and 4 are secured together via 3 aluminum bolts.

So what is happening here in his wheel that is different from my pizza wheel. Well my wheel is secured to the bearing right away. His bearing is at the base of the cylinder. My wheel is a wheel. His wheel is more like if someone was turning an open umbrella by the handle.

So the question is, what would be the difference between (for this consideration) two identical rotors and wheels, one that has a bearing in its center and the other that has a bearing at the base of an extended cylinder. Does this one fact help the process? i am thinking that my wheel is more 2 dimensional, whereas Mylows seems to be more 3 dimensional. Are there other forces at play in one more then the other.

This is not an easy question. Please think this over carefully.

[Omega_0]

Useful :


http://www.pureenergysystems.com/os/MagneticMotors/Mylow/v2.0/Photos/

http://peswiki.com/index.php/OS:MYLOW:Plans:Version_2.0