MylowHJ Replication - Discussion

[corona]

We don't know yet, because we don't know the effect on the magnets. If with good material magnets it does not demagnetize them, and it can spin continously, even if you only get a pico-watt of continous energy out of it, it will eventually make up for the amount of energy taken to make the magnets, and keep on going. But like I said, too much is unknown about the mechanics behind the process.
And regardless, even if it never makes up the energy taken to make the magnets, it still turns conventional magnetic theory on its head, because the text books state it's impossible to get continous motion with just magnets - ie they say magnets can't store and release energy (although it's recently been scientifically shown that energy can be stored in magnetic spin (http://www6.miami.edu/UMH/CDA/UMH_Main/1,1770,65985-1;66008-3,00.html)

Sorry about the OT,
Andrew

[Justalabrat]

Hey guys and girls, can I ask a question? Lets say if mylows motor works, and that is a big IF. But lets say it does. From the videos it looks like there is not much torque for this motor. I doubt that it will turn a generater. So it will be just a big paper weight that spins.

Don't you see that this is just a baby step, to have something that just has enough power to turn itself.  Once it's proved to the world that it does turn by itself, it will be analyzed by scientists and engineers to figure out why it turns. And once they understand the principle they will expand on it and make it more powerful!

[nyctuber]

1/4" 18" x 18" 6061 T6 Aluminum Plate $55.92 + ship

http://www.midweststeelsupply.com

[petersone]

Hi Justalabrat
You are right of course,but not a baby step,getting from 99% to 101% is a small step for man but-----
Neal Armstrong, I think
peter

[AnandAadhar]

A study into Mylow's strategy of positioning the rotor magnets. Picture 1 shows how measured from the middle of the bars there is a deviance relative to the mechanical center of spin of about 2mm. Picture 2 shows the alignment with zero deviance when we measure the positioning from the edge of the magnets in the top row to the middle of the magnets in the opposite row.

This would support the theory on the operation that the offset of the center of magnetic spin from the center of mechanical spin might be decisive in catching the time energy of space. Abstracted: Et=Rl x Rv. In words: The machine produces pure time energy as a product of the linear channelled rotation (Rl) of the magnetic track combined with the vortex effect of an off center magnetic focus (Rv).

Doing tests of my own show that setting off the center of magnetic spin facilitates the spin in one direction at the cost of the other (including stator polarity reversal). Thus there is directional preference depending the positioning of the magnetic focus.  This can thus work in favor as much as it may work against operation.