MylowHJ Replication - Discussion

[dean_mcgowan]

A study into Mylow's strategy of positioning the rotor magnets. Picture 1 shows how measured from the middle of the bars there is a deviance relative to the mechanical center of spin of about 2mm. Picture 2 shows the alignment with zero deviance when we measure the positioning from the edge of the magnets in the top row to the middle of the magnets in the opposite row.

This would support the theory on the operation that the offset of the center of magnetic spin from the center of mechanical spin might be decisive in catching the time energy of space. Abstracted: Et=Rl x Rv. In words: The machine produces pure time energy as a product of the linear channelled rotation (Rl) of the magnetic track combined with the vortex effect of an off center magnetic focus (Rv).

Doing tests of my own show that setting off the center of magnetic spin facilitates the spin in one direction at the cost of the other (including stator polarity reversal). Thus there is directional preference depending the positioning of the magnetic focus.  This can thus work in favor as much as it may work against operation.

I admire your effort however i think you have failed to take into account distortion from the angle the photographs were taken and the lense distortion. The results of your investigation are most likely as skewed as the angles.

Maybe you could attempt to compensate but it would be quite an accomplishment to get all the details for mylow to assist you.

Cheers,

Dean

[Omega_0]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5wQOSl8G3yA

[hansvonlieven]

I admire your effort however i think you have failed to take into account distortion from the angle the photographs were taken and the lense distortion. The results of your investigation are most likely as skewed as the angles.

Maybe you could attempt to compensate but it would be quite an accomplishment to get all the details for mylow to assist you.

Cheers,

Dean

Doesn't look too distorted to me dean.

Hans von Lieven

[Omega_0]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VIAJhuDV1cg&NR=1

[TinselKoala]

I strongly recommend that experimenters try to use some standard method of giving that initial starting impulse to their wheels. The "hill" terminology is appropriate here: if you start at the top of the hill, you are ignoring the energy it took to get up the hill in the first place: which is imparted by Mr. Hand and is impossible to quantify. Just because it feels like nothing, when you're at the top of the hill, that means you are ignoring all that magnetic PE that you stored in climbing the hill in the first place--and which will be returned by the slightest tiny push over the "top".
So, the way to tell if your modifications are helping or hurting, is to use some method for Climbing the Initial Hill that is standardizable, repeatable, and measurable, instead of the manual positioning at hilltop method. You've got to start in the Valley!!
I use 2 methods, and they are both illustrated in my videos. Winding a string a known amount around the axle or edge, and letting a known weight on the string pull the disk up the hill and over, imparts a known starting force that can be precisely repeated from trial to trial. A simple stopwatch can be used to time the time it takes for all disk motion to cease. If your magnets are helping, it will go for a longer time, yes?
Or, if one has access to the instrumentation, one can run the disk up to a known RPM with a motor drive of some sort, and record a graph of rundown  RPM vs. Time using a tachometer and stopwatch, or direct data logging to the computer. If the magnets are helping, even if the time isn't longer, the shape of the rundown curve might be different, yes?