Cold Electricity

[dole]

@ouguru4u, @Magnethos
It would be my pleasure to explain what I did but it could be completely wrong so please I am still studding different phenomena.
Yes this is simple an condenser discharge on a both side of the coil connected in a parallel and discharge through the thick copper pipe or a wire. Exactly as in the mentioned link, and similar to the hairpin,  I used the rotary spark gap, but what I found important is stated in the original notes (standing wave), further important rule is a exactly equal symmetry, length to fix nodes and of course induction and capacity and input frequency. I did not have more than 50Hz at that moment so then resonant frequency is omega=314 rad/s for 50HZ and respectively chosen capacity and induction.
This is the real Tesla primary, here I may insert in series with primary thick U bar and light incandescent light bulb. I am still studding resonance and a excitation only in the primary.
Same principle is used for the ferrite core coil excitation.

d.

[quarktoo]

Dole appears to be using Naudin's circuit that attempts to replicate the claimed free energy device of Kapanadze.

http://jnaudin.free.fr/kapagen/

There are lots of tricks that have been recycled over the years make people think they have a free energy device using a light bulb. Most are just self deluded from what I have seen and I have seen a bunch of them.

Increasing voltage will increase the amount of light from a bulb. Voltage is stepped down from the power lines so you don't have electric arcs coming out of the wall socket but the power to your home would be much more efficient if it were not. Not having a wall fire or getting electrocuted every time you try and plug something in is what you get for stepping it down.

What you don't see in any of the Naudin replications is a self running device and that is always the final jury. Another thing you don't see is a proper measurement of voltage and current. Instead you see output measured here, lux measured there, etc. What? Nobody has a scope or ability to measure true RMS? Nobody has heard of Fourier analysis?

I seriously doubt that they have replicated anything more than a joule thief which uses an unsaturable reactor to step up voltage and people believe that equals more power as they use a light bulb to measure output.

That is not science, free energy or anything that is not understood. Just the self delusion of the uneducated masses.

Here are the basic rules regarding free energy devices:

1. All free energy devices convert mass into the atomic energy contained within the mass.

2. All free energy devices use acceleration to convert mass (think atom smasher) into potential energy.

3. E=MC2 is the formula that is used to convert mass into the atomic energy contained within the mass. Instead of "E", Einstein should have called it "MTAE" (mass to atomic energy conversion) MTAEC=MC2. The more you accelerate the mass, the more energy you can convert and it does violate any laws of thermodynamics. It is free energy in an economic sense since the universe compressed energy into the mass and it takes less energy to extract it than what you get out.

Energy is not the ability to do work, that would be potential energy. M=E (mass = energy) just as Maxwell stated. Again Einstein screwed up someone else's work and that was about all he ever did in his over hyped useless life.

Electricity itself is mass to atomic energy conversion and once you understand what electricity is, how all free energy devices work is obvious. Just locate the mass being converted and the method of acceleration and you understand how it works.

It is so simple and yet so elusive to most since in order to understand it, they have to UNlearn something that is not true. Me thinks Einstein was working for his friend Rockafeller or JP Morgan. Einstein was pretty much dismissed by real scientists just a few years after e=mc2. He hid it in plain sight.

[WilbyInebriated]

Here are the basic rules regarding free energy devices:

1. All free energy devices convert mass into the atomic energy contained within the mass.

2. All free energy devices use acceleration to convert mass (think atom smasher) into potential energy.

...

the above is flawed logic, similar to the 'all swans are white' logical fallacy...

[sparks]

  The electron inertia in a 1s orbital in electrical terms computes to 1 milliampere of current.  That is alot of current in just one tiny spot.  Now if you combine the currents in one mole of atoms you have 6 times 10 to the 20 amperes.  That is an astounding amount of mass in motion.  When mass in motion slows down it emits photons or quantom inertia.  The rate at which it slows down will determine the wavelength of the emitted photons.  When they slow down at the end of a brief acceleration in a vacuum tube they emit xrays.  When you get them to slow down and emit ultraviolet light it ionizes air molecules which then causes more electrons to get cut loose from the air molecules which are subsequently slowed down until your first litlle push in one atom has a whole mole of atoms accelerated in a common direction.  They hit a target with billions of times the energy of the input.

[quarktoo]

BEMF is the emf generated in a wire next to a wire with current flowing through it, which is in opposition to the first current.

It is not magnetic field collapse or backward time.

If cold electricity involves a movement of electrons or is BEMF - why is there no magnetic field associated with it?

Because it is slightly superluminal?

An electric arc produces cold electricity and it is the negative E? - see Paul Dirac. Mass is being converted into energy in an electric arc and as such, electrons and other free charge carriers are flowing to the arc at light speed.

Electrons on the other hand move down a wire at a speed of less than 1 meter per minute. The shockwave positive voltage is caused by the Ahanorov Bohm effect as charge carriers from the electron sea are cavitated on the conductor surrounding an inductor and converted into potential energy - that is what electricity is, mass to atomic energy conversion. This knowledge is suppressed as it is key to understanding how free energy devices work.

If people understood that, then they would look for ways to accelerate those charge carriers and increase the amount of mass being converted.

There is a Canadian guy that is selling a free energy device and he appeared on a inventor TV show. He stated that the transformer would have to be rewound every few years. I suspect the reason for that is that the accelerated charge carriers on the copper wire will erode the insulation.