Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Thane Heins Perepiteia Replications

Started by hartiberlin, May 28, 2009, 05:54:52 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 18 Guests are viewing this topic.

Pageygeeza

Ok then i_Ron.  It's far from accurate, but you get the idea.

Pageygeeza

Ooops, I got my clockwise and anti-clockwise mixed up. :S

i_ron

Quote from: derricka on June 11, 2009, 04:40:00 PM
If anyone here is confused, let me shed some light on the situation.
For a purely inductive coil, Tinsel Koala and iRon are correct. (Voltage is zero at top dead center)

Thane is claiming voltage is not zero. This is because Thane's high voltage coils have a significant capacitive component, due to the larger number of turns. As the magnet approaches the coil, this capacitance is charging up, so at top dead center, there will be a voltage. The true circuit here, is much more like a LC circuit (or more accurately, RLC circuit), where voltage and current are no longer in phase (power factor).

snip

Derricka and Larry,

Yes I am open to this... but it has to be explained against the actual coil operation. There are two generated peaks, one positive and one negative. To just focus on the one peak that might be delayed until TDC and not account for what is happening to the other peak is imprecise.

What my contention with Steven and Thane was in their view there was only one major peak at TDC. My concern with Thane's presentations are that he has only ever stated DC coil resistance, never Henries, never A B scope pictures of HV coils with HC coils showing any phase delays. It takes major amounts of capacitance to make an LC circuit yet no numbers for this supposed capacitance have ever been shown.

Ron



Pageygeeza

But to my original question, I think Occam's Razor applies to the answer.

i_ron


Derricka and Larry,

I was wondering more along the iron theme. What about the propagation delay of the flux in iron at these speeds?

The reason being, if you missed my earlier post, when I used Somaloy there was no core loss reduction...rather an increase in draw with the coil shorted.

QuoteOK, the first test with the laminated core and a 63 ohm coil... with the circuit open the draw was 15 watts. With the coil shorted the draw was only 4.42 watts.

However, with the Somaloy core the draw was only about 4 watts to start with and shorting the coil increased the draw!
Quote

This test should indicate that it is iron that is required, not capacitance.

So what I am saying is, if the flux buildup in the core is delayed then so also will the voltage buildup in the coil… in respect to the magnets position.

Ron