Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Stan Meyer Energy is Stolen from The Sun

Started by L505, May 29, 2009, 02:49:59 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

alan

Ok let's start with some simple questions a noob like I can't answer:

why won't the electron collapse into the proton, since they attract each other? [mutually generated and repelling EM fields?]
If an electron is transfered to a higher energy level, how does a photon force it outwards and what is keeping it over there? [does it at all stay there?]
or does a photon increase the charge of an electron or proton, and as a result get more mutually repelled by the force thats keeping them separated?
???

now, is it possible to alter the electron orbit by voltage? [absolutely, aka displacement current.]
can this alter the energy level by forcing the electrons to a higher orbit, without electron collision taking place [like a fluorescent light]?
is it possible to create a charge that is interlocked and has no path to flow away?
million dollar question:
is it possible for this charge to create a displacement current without this dipole being broken down by the EM fields created by the displacement current?

Farrah Day

Alan

Quotewhy won't the electron collapse into the proton, since they attract each other?

Now you're asking the questions that I don't believe science knows the answers to.  The same thing applies to planets orbiting the sun... why doesn't the gravitational force of the sun simply suck us in... or is it very slowly?

The electron has an energy that keeps it in orbit around the nucleus, and we know that if it gives up some of that energy it's orbiting distance will reduce (if there is a vacancy), but it seems an electron will always contain the minimum amount of energy to maintain an orbit.  This energy seems to be the nature by which our universe functions, a fundamental energy that exists... always... but what do I know!

I think the answer to your question is yet to be understood by anyone... except maybe Quarky  ;)

I don't think voltage can effect an electrons orbit, it has to be a photon particle. Voltage is only potential energy, a photon is a particle of energy. It is the electron that absorbs or emits a photon in order to make a transition between energy levels. Every electron energy level in every atom requires a specific discrete amount of energy to make a transition, this is why only photons of certain frequencies are absorbed or emitted by orbiting electrons. Incidentaly, if an outer electron absorbs too much energy it can free itself from the atom altogether, and, I believe, in this state the electron is free to attain much higher energy levels.

Quoteis it possible to create a charge that is interlocked and has no path to flow away?
million dollar question:
is it possible for this charge to create a displacement current without this dipole being broken down by the EM fields created by the displacement current?

Not sure what you mean by this. The charges on the plate of a capacitor or a Van de Graf generator are static until discharged. Have no idea about your million dollar question.

Though, I must say that I don't think this depth of understanding is particularly necessary to make progress in the field that concerns us here. 

As I said, for a better understanding study the work of Bohr, and hope your brain can take it all in without your head exploding!
Farrah Day

"It's what you learn after you know it all that counts"

HeairBear

I have posted this book before but I'm gonna do it again cuz it's a kick ass book.
http://au.geocities.com/psyberplasm/

I like where this thread is going now...  There must be a ton of literature about this very subject. What  will we find?

And Meyer's version...  http://waterpoweredcar.com/pdf.files/section5.pdf

Tesla's version... http://rpmgt.org/588177.html

Rife/Bedini... http://www.icehouse.net/john34/rife.html

Old School... http://www.levity.com/alchemy/
When I hear of Shoedinger's Cat, I reach for my gun. - Stephen Hawking

newbie123

Quote from: Farrah Day on June 18, 2009, 05:20:33 PM

The electron has an energy that keeps it in orbit around the nucleus, and we know that if it gives up some of that energy it's orbiting distance will reduce (if there is a vacancy), but it seems an electron will always contain the minimum amount of energy to maintain an orbit.  This energy seems to be the nature by which our universe functions, a fundamental energy that exists... always... but what do I know!


From my understanding Nature gets really, really,  strange at the atomic scale (nothing like our macro scale)....    For example,  electrons have been shown to not really orbit around the nucleus like a planet and a sun.      Atomic electrons actually stay in what is referred to as an orbital   or "probability" cloud...   (explained by the Heisenberg uncertainty principle) ... 

They (electrons) can show up anywhere around the nucleus, and even inside the nucleus (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electron_capture) at times, or even multiple locations at once..          This was the big  problem with classical electrodynamics... It didn't account for this behavior.     According to classical electrodynamics the electrons should just crash into their nucleus..  But this isn't the case (luckily) ..  So some really bright physicists came up with  Quantum Electro Dynamics  .. Which models an electron's behavior accurately.

The the shape of the orbital and energy levels can be described and predicted by the schrodinger equation  (which basically replaced the Bohr model..  And made it obsolete)..   

Also,   electrons also have a property known as  quantum  spin, as do photons,  and quarks....   and as far as I know this phenomena cannot be described in physical terms  (none mathematical) ..  i.e.   quantum spin isn't like a spinning planet..
Until you can measure it, arguing about something can be many things.. But science is not one of them.

Farrah Day

QuoteFrom my understanding Nature gets really, really,  strange at the sub atomic scale (nothing like our macro scale)....    For example,  electrons have been shown to not really orbit around around the nucleus like a planet and a sun.      Atomic electrons stay in what is referred to as an orbital   or "probability" cloud...   

Yes, the probability cloud makes Bohrs depiction of the atom look like something from a junior school blackboard. This is a further development from Bohr in terms of how the electrons behave. Enter Austrian physicist Erwin Schrodinger, and move from quantum theory to quantum mechanics. Whereby the action of simply looking at something will affect the result... mind-bogling stuff.

Alan, also read up on the work of Schrodinger.
Farrah Day

"It's what you learn after you know it all that counts"