New TPU build

[Grumpy]

Compressed time?  Is this something you just made up?

yep - just made it up - kind of a play on words, bastardized and compressed.

You used the term "warped":

I'm not talking about Schumann here and btw Ronald Mallett, Professor at the University of Connecticut, is thinking that time could be warped.So again, the time around the collectors is warped, now what?

Distortion is a better term.  Thanks BEP.

Of course, whether or not time varies is not important to the task at hand - is it?  One does not need to know the intricate details to make it work.

[BEP]

BTW:

My thoughts on the solution for building a TPU that didn't care about right-side up and upside-down:

He added an on-board reference. Another collector, most likely two. The rotation direction was still important but only to the polarity of the output.

The reason the earliest ones only worked right-side up:

The reference was the magnetic field of the Earth, not gravity. Hasn't anyone done experiments with static magnetic fields in-motion within the magnetic field of the Earth?

I have the strong feeling the 'gyroscopic action' was not that simple. It would have been more like 'station keeping'. It would not have only resisted changes in pitch and yaw. It should have resisted horizontal and vertical movement, as well.

[newbie123]

Knock Knock... Anybody home?

BEP,

Nice Goggle-Foo skills you got there....

Wrong.. Things can't easily become super luminal.

Maybe you can explain how to easily make an X-shaped wave travel at super luminal speeds?  Or maybe you can explain to me what an X-shaped wave is (This is new to me)?

http://www.iop.org/EJ/abstract/0305-4470/33/40/318
http://cerncourier.com/cws/article/cern/28606

[BEP]

yep - just made it up - kind of a play on words, bastardized and compressed.

You used the term "warped":

Distortion is a better term.  Thanks BEP.

'Warped' probably fits the TPU action better.

Of course, whether or not time varies is not important to the task at hand - is it?  One does not need to know the intricate details to make it work.

Nope. It doesn't matter because time always wins out. It may slip for a short 'time' relative to the rest but it always wins. Einstein was definitely wrong using the twins and light speed travel example. No matter how fast the speeding twin travels or how long - when he steps out of his near-light speed craft - all is right back in sync again. So I avoid conversations about time travel and anti-gravity. To me, they are jokes.

Time viewing may become possible.

Anti-gravity probably does exist. It'll never be usable.

[BEP]

BEP,

Nice Goggle-Foo skills you got there....


Maybe you can explain how to easily make an X-shaped wave travel at super luminal speeds?  Or maybe you can explain to me what an X-shaped wave is (This is new to me)?

An X-Shaped wave has a real-world existence already. NASA calls it 'magnetic reconnection'. I doubt the pin-heads have made the connection 

You don't need to build an X-shaped wave to make a wave faster than c. Head-on collisions are just easier for most to understand.

>>>>

Oh! BTW: An X-shaped wave wouldn't travel faster than c. The X shape allows for disconnection then reconnection. Faster than c travel happens to anything in the way of the reconnection, sometimes called a 'slap' or 'clap'.