Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie

[Asymatrix]

Fear of Wilby's ghosts of words past haunting you ?

Sometimes thats just what happens when you troll...you eventually run into someone who takes the time to go back and dig up fr you to choke on.

The luck of the draw.

*steps out of ring with phantom tag on Wilby, avoiding freshly re-tarred hands*

Considering I'm relatively new, your assertions are as predictably idiotic as everything else you post.

The tag team analogy is perfect, though. Tag team trolls. 100% accurate.

[Cap-Z-ro]

ooOOOOOMarley...Wilby Marley...what do you want from me ?


Wilby Marley:

The truuuth, youuuu trollll...the truuthh...

Either that or your lying a$$, you lyin' trollll...

[utilitarian]

ooOOOOOMarley...Wilby Marley...what do you want from me ?


Wilby Marley:

The truuuth, youuuu trollll...the truuthh...

Either that or your lying a$$, you lyin' trollll...

This is all coming from the guy who believes in reptilians, Illuminati NWO, chemtrails, is a "birther", a "truther", thinks milk is going to kill you, and that the the world governments are behind the swine flu epidemic.  If you think any of this is "lies" or "misdirection", just take a gander at the topics under "We can't live without the truth."

I think your credibility is zero.

[Cap-Z-ro]

And presently Wilby has you caught up to your neck/a$$ in your own bullshit...

we are all waiting for your response.

So, before you present similar evidence of me contradicting myself, why don't you respond to Will ?

Its a much better strategy/misdirection to move on to more baseless BS about me isn't it ?

Hey...I got a new plan for you...why not try more baseless assertions about Willby ?

[utilitarian]

And presently Wilby has you caught up to your neck/a$$ in your own bullshit...

we are all waiting for your response.

So, before you present similar evidence of me contradicting myself, why don't you respond to Will ?

Its a much better strategy/misdirection to move on to more baseless BS about me isn't it ?

Hey...I got a new plan for you...why not try more baseless assertions about Willby ?

You want a response?  Wilby is a troll who is derailing the thread. He is not addressing the main topic, which is Ainslie's device and its overunity properties.  Instead, he is nitpicking on irrelevant inconsitencies by some of the posters.  Here is the order of what happened, briefly.

1.  TK posts his replication of Ainslie's device.  He admits up front that some parts were not exactly as posted in the specs.  Again, he admits this, right up front, it's like one of the first things he says.  So to insist later that the issue with the mosfet is somehow a lie is absurd.

2.  Wilby immediately jumps in with a derisive post to the effect of, " are you ever going to do this right?"  Who the hell starts off this way?  It is an immediate attack on the experimenter, and could have been phrased much more constructively, but he is an asshole, so whatever.

3.  More posts go by, and apparently somewhere down the road TK refers to his experiment as an exact replication.

4.  Wilby of course jumps over this, banging on the issue of the mosfet.  He insists that TK is a liar, even though TK admitted up front that the mosfet was different, so anyone following the thread COULD IN NO WAY BE MISLEAD by the "exact" phrase.  TK makes an argument that the mosfet difference is not critical to the conclusion of the experiment.  To this day, Wilby cannot make a scientific argument why it is critical or affects the over/under unity of the device, and in fact he has conceded as much.

5.  TK amends his previous statement to "nearly exact."

6.  Ever since, Wilby has been calling TK a liar and has been demanding that the experiment be repeated to spec.  Incidentally, Wilby has reneged on his promise to send TK the mosfet in question, despite an explicit promise to do so.  (Liar, liar pants on fire?)  He has similarly called me a liar for my claim that he has hurled nothing but insults.  Apparently, my missing his "jack of all trades" backhanded compliment somehow makes me a lying liar.

Wilby, in his frothing state of mind, is unable to distinguish between a lie and an inadvertent inaccuracy, one that is tangential to the main purpose of this thread - to decide whether Ainslie's device is overunity or not.

My take:

a.  Wilby is clearly not concerned with whether Ainslie's device is overunity or not.  He is just madly trying to find fault with the replication.  Unable to articulate why the different mosfet would or would not make a difference in the conclusion of the replication, he is reduced to picking fights with TK over the "exact / nearly exact" issue.

b.  Wilby does not offer an experiment of his own to prove/disprove the overunity claims in question.  He has admitted that this is not his concern, even though he will not let go of the mosfet issue.  You would think that someone that obsessed with the issue of exact specs would get of his ass to do his own replication, but apparently it is more entertaining for him to just troll this thread.

c.  Wilby has not contributed any way to the efforts of TK, so his demands that the experiment be done his way are like the tantrum of a child.