Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie

Started by TinselKoala, June 16, 2009, 09:52:52 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 29 Guests are viewing this topic.

utilitarian

Quote from: WilbyInebriated on August 14, 2009, 06:45:11 PM
are you mental? i just answered that.
where have i ever said his deviations are what is stopping him from achieving OU? can you find that post and show it to the world please? no you can't, because it doesn't exist. POINT IN FACT, all you will ever find is me telling him that it's bad methodology to use 'whatever' instead of SPECIFIED components.

more BASELESS assumption and attempts at misdirection from the peanut gallery is all you have offered. ::) typical.

Here is your evidence.  You are not contesting the fact that the deviation from specs is what is stopping TK from achieving OU.

So which is it, are you claiming that the deviation from specs is what is preventing OU, or are you not saying that?  If you are claiming the deviation is material, i.e., but for the mosfet, TK would have OU, please state your basis for this claim.

newbie123

You guys are still trying to  argue with Wilby?    Heh..  Come on!   It's like trying to reason with a 3 year old!!

Just put him on your ignore list, and stop wasting  your time.

Cap-z-ro is pretty much the same way....   

@Wilby and Cap'n:


This is a big boy thread.  Why don't you guys go play in  the  "truth" section.





Until you can measure it, arguing about something can be many things.. But science is not one of them.

utilitarian

Quote from: WilbyInebriated on August 16, 2009, 10:10:52 PM
can you demonstrate how NOT capitalizing the first word of a sentence changes it's meaning?

Similarly, can you demonstrate how NOT using the specified mosfet will result in a different conclusion to the experiment, i.e. that the circuit is overunity, rather than underunity as demonstrated?

MileHigh

Aaron:

QuoteWhen testing at 122PM, it was a -41.3mv (-0.0413 volts) yes, negative average voltage on shunt for almost 10 hours. You can see it at the
bottom right of the scope. I also have the shunt RMS just for reference. That is more going back to the batteries than what left the batteries.

It looks to me like your shunt resistor channel is AC coupled when it should be DC coupled.  The waveform drifts down when you are AC coupled so that the real DC ground is now showing a negative potential relative to the AC coupling ground.  Thus the DSO Channel 2 "Mean" calculation gives you a negative voltage.  The solution is to switch to DC coupling.

Ironically enough, your purple trace, your battery voltage, is DC coupled when it should be AC coupled if you are trying to find small spikes on the battery voltage.

It looks like your 555 trace is AC coupled when it should be DC coupled.

A pointer:  The time base you are on is more for a quick glance for when you want to get a sense of the relative proportion of high to low in your signals.  There is much more information to gleam at much faster time bases.

MileHigh

Asymatrix

Quote from: utilitarian on August 16, 2009, 10:59:44 PM
Similarly, can you demonstrate how NOT using the specified mosfet will result in a different conclusion to the experiment, i.e. that the circuit is overunity, rather than underunity as demonstrated?

You got it