Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Mk1 - thanks for the link.  It's actually the first time I've seen Dr Greer.  Have only heard about him.  Found the talk inspiring.  I get it that Poynt needs to watch this - and for that matter MileHigh.    So guys.  How about finding out a little about how 'team hopeful' think?   

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Guys - here's something that will knock your socks off - or to quote MH quoting the imortal words of Steve Miller  WoOoOO WoOOooo.  Definitely the Michelson-Morley experiment no longer 'definitive' and Aether theory possibly on the rise. 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7T0d7o8X2-E

[tagor]

Guys - here's something that will knock your socks off - or to quote MH quoting the imortal words of Steve Miller  WoOoOO WoOOooo.  Definitely the Michelson-Morley experiment no longer 'definitive' and Aether theory possibly on the rise. 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7T0d7o8X2-E

Maurice Allais see wikipedia

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maurice_Allais

since 2004 , he is saying that "Michelson-Morley experiment" was succesfull !!

2004
Sur l'interprétation des expériences de Michelson. Aucun vent
d'Ether de 30 km/sec, mais un vent d'Ether de 8 km/sec.
Avril 2004, 19 p.

sorry this is in french :

http://allais.maurice.free.fr/Genese.htm

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Hello Tagor,  Many thanks for the interesting info on Allais.  I'm just so sorry he insists on writing in French.  I've tried to do the Google 'translate' number but failed.  But I know someone who can possibly do it for me at EF.com. 

I'd be interested to know more about his gravity experiments and his arguments against relativity.  But I'm not sure I respect that criticism of Einstein.  He's my absolute hero - in all things - notwithstanding his lost argument with the quantum theorists. 

EDIT - unless MH can oblige.  I know he's got a facility with the Russian to English number. 

[poynt99]

Poynt - I get it that you know nothing of the thesis?  More's the pity. 

What interests me at the moment is the experimental setup and the test results from it.

If any results obtained go against what would normally be expected in terms of classical theory, then this may warrant a look at yours and other theories in order to explain the unknown. But the task at hand before this is to see if indeed anything unusual or unexplainable by conventional theory appears in the results in the first place.

And Fuzzy's 'numbers' did not show a net negative.  Only his waveforms did. 

I will have to look again.

and I realise that your demo will show a net gain.  Would expect nothing less.

Hmm, so why am I going through the trouble of doing the experiment if you already expect nothing "unusual" in my results? And I think you meant "net loss", not "net gain"?

BTW - the measly -5.4 mV.  I want it to be even more measly at 0.00 mV's.  And why aren't you speaking to me?

From a COP>1 perspective, I would think that you would want as negative as possible while still achieving heating or cooling above/below ambient.

.99