Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Hi Poynt.    
I get it you're not into theory.  And regarding your question as to why you're doing the experiment?  I would hope this is not entirely for my benefit.  And I did mean net loss and not net gain.  And I'd be able to explain zero loss - but am into theoretical melt down at cooling below ambient.  And why did you ignore my last question? 

[poynt99]

I'm very much into new theories and have a few of my own TPU theories that are in continual development.

However, unless something new is discovered with these switched-inductor circuits in particular, I see no need to develop any new theories for them. So far I have not seen anything from the posted experimental results that appears new, novel, or that can't be explained in classical terms.

I am doing the experiment mainly for your benefit and the benefit of all others that are interested in these circuits and their potential as OU devices. I and others have commented extensively about the poor quality of the test apparatus and methods, and doing this test is also a means to live up to those comments and hopefully enable others to do better testing in the future once they see how it can be done.

You lost me on the net loss thing.

Regarding your question, I take comments such as "your PM's are getting boring" etc. as a pretty solid indicator for me to cease and desist in that regard, so of course I've limited any dialog to the posts only. I'd hate to bore you further. If you are referring to Skype, I assumed the comment pertained to that as well, and the answer is the same.

.99

[Rosemary Ainslie]

I'm not sure what TPU stands for?  Is this related to development in simulators?  You've mentioned this before.  If not - then I'm in the dark here. 

You've got it back to front.  The initial experiment was to prove a thesis.  The standard is this - Develop a model - thesis stage - prove it and it's elevated to theory. But the thesis must always precede the experimental evidence if the thesis is of any value.  And thus far there are a dearth of replications in the initial experiment.  Hopefully this will change.  Meanwhile a new - unpredicted - but required effect is showing some 'small evidence' of proof - and some considerable interest in terms of its effect.

It's brave of you to take on the standards required.  A new bench mark?  I wonder if you can improve on Fuzzy's and Aaron's efforts.  But it would be nice to be surprised. The point is that all waveforms generated require some considerable patience to allow them to manifest.  Is your interest in proving it equal to the effort required?  We'll see.

My question stands.  I was hoping for resolution.  You clearly don't share that hope.

[MileHigh]

Hey Rosemary:

Guys - here's something that will knock your socks off - or to quote MH quoting the imortal words of Steve Miller  WoOoOO WoOOooo.  Definitely the Michelson-Morley experiment no longer 'definitive' and Aether theory possibly on the rise.

I looked at the clip and it is pure crap.  So, just for fun, let me put the ball in your court.  What is wrong with the clip?

MileHigh

[MileHigh]

Experimenters:

With identical voltages on liquid and gel at all same settings on circuit, the liquid lead acid battery gave more heat on the resistor. Rosemary might remember more details. We were talking while I was doing that test. I'll try to find the notes on it.

This is ostensibly impossible.  So, what would be the logical next step in the investigation?  Put your thinking caps on...

I can charge a battery with this charger and when it is "drained", I can charge it back up with a standard charger and the standard charger immediately starts to charge it so it is like the normal charger doesn't have to fill up the "holes" first until it actually starts to charge it. If the Bearden idea is right about that.

Looks like Thomas Bearden stole a buzzword from semiconductor physics!  How crafty!  lol

MileHigh