Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie

[PaulLowrance]

Paul,

I'd have to say you're the one being dodgy here. I asked you specifically what criteria you use and that's the best you can do?

If you can't do that, then explain why you don't agree with my criteria posted above.

Please abide by your own "rules", or kindly buzz off.

.99

I've already described it countless time, and recently. You are the one that's dodgy. I recently asked you to show the control experiment. Where is it? Huh? I'll retype my answer, yet one more time, as to criteria that makes a person insincere, when you can answer my question that was asked days ago.

I'll be waiting for you post the link to where you or someone measured the temperature of the component, and then did the control experiment that measured how much electrical power is required to heat that same component to the same temperature. What's the matter .99.  Why are you & your group so dodgy? Something to hide?

Paul

[poynt99]

Good grief Paul... 

Look ONE PAGE BACK! I posted the darn numbers.

http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=7620.msg206751#msg206751

And just to be clear here, I am in no "group" as you call it, in particular the Rose Ainslie group. I am pretty much on my own here except for occasional help and support from Hoppy and MileHigh.

.99

[PaulLowrance]

Good grief Paul... 

Look ONE PAGE BACK! I posted the darn numbers.

http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=7620.msg206751#msg206751

And just to be clear here, I am in no "group" as you call it, in particular the Rose Ainslie group. I am pretty much on my own here except for occasional help and support from Hoppy and MileHigh.

.99

.99, you think you're fooling people? I've seen those numbers, and I even replied to that post. That's one sign of insincerity, *pretending* to answer the question. Where in your post do you show the temperature that the component produced, and then applied electrical power in a control experiment to reproduce that ***same*** temperature?

If you or someone did it, then why beat around the bush being dodgy. Just show the numbers.

Paul

[PaulLowrance]

After asking for the numbers over the past week, it appears nobody is going to do it. If you do, then great! And if everything looks fine, then I'd be more than happy to replicate it.

If anyone ever decides to correctly measure the Rosemary Ainslie device, then here are numbers one would expect,

Example, again, this is only an example:
The component in the Rosemary Ainslie device heated up 30 degrees Celsius. The power consumed by the battery (or batteries) was 20 watts. I then immediately connected the component to a DC power supply, and began increasing the voltage till the component produced the same temperature, which required 21 watts.

Paul

[poynt99]

Alright Paul,

Since you can't be bothered to read through a few pages of my posts, I'll do this for you this time.

First, Glen's results:
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=7620.msg206035#msg206035
Final temperature was about 136ºF. You have already been given the link and seen the control tests Glen performed for this resistor.

Second, data from my 375kHz run:
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=7620.msg205855#msg205855
Ambient was about 22ºC, so final temperature is 22+67 = 89ºC

Third, data from my last 2.5kHz run:
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=7620.msg205850#msg205850
"Actual POS" means control test power output from supply
"TRAA" means temp rise above ambient, so 22+8 = 30ºC final temperature

Now, had you been following the thread along, you wouldn't have to be pestering anyone to offset your laziness to go back a little and read what has already been posted.

I've got nothing to hide, and I've hidden nothing. My goal is to illustrate with good data what this circuit is actually producing in terms of power in and heat out. Why would I be hiding anything Paul?--I certainly am not a proponent of the claims being made about this circuit.

And since you probably missed this too, here it is again, my test plan:

.99