Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie

[PaulLowrance]

It was added to the post after you read it. It is mentioned in your quote.

http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=7620.msg207049#msg207049

.99

Great, at least it contains the abbreviations.

Paul

[WilbyInebriated]

hunt for one "test plan!" ended one page back. here is the easy button paul...
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=7620.0;attach=38645

[poynt99]

It was posted on the 18th of October...here:

http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=7620.msg205130#msg205130

.99

[PaulLowrance]

.99

After looking through all the links, including the attached "Test plan," one can make sense of the forum data, but there seems to be an issue in that you did not do the control measurements for the mosfet and shunt. Not so much the shunt, but the mosfet seems to produce significant power, according to the scope, but then again such scope calculations can be tossed out the door.

To clarify your measurements, the DC power from the battery was 22.72 watts, and the load produced 13.5 watts worth of *heat.*

Will you finish the control experiments by at least measuring the mosfet heat production? If it's over 9.22 watts, then there's something interesting here.

Paul

[PaulLowrance]

The whole exercise was doomed from the start because even Rosemary could not be certain of the exact details of the circuit due to poor documentation, so a true replication of whatever circuit the 'academics' tested has not been possible. Various circuit configurations based on the published circuit diagrams were tested and none of these have shown overunity, let alone COP17.

That's true, but I have not seen any completed experiments yet. Closest so far goes to .99, but he needs to at least measure the mosfet. IMO it's likely to produce less than 9.2 watts of power. The final question is to do a quick analysis on the load to see if it's radiating much RF energy.

Paul