Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie

[Grumpy]

You may want to actually talk to the editorial faction of IEEE before you guess at what they may or may not accept.  Dr. Stephan Marinov went to great lengths to publish his work and no "organization" would touch it.  Seems they have a reputation to keep and anything psuedo shall not be touched...

By the way, a "control", even if only a sanity check, IS an accepted method of testing - at least for the last four hundred years!

As you all can see, there are other ways to get "heat":
http://www.electrotherapymuseum.com/Articles/FlamingWhiteArcCoils.htm

6000 degrees - smokin'!

[poynt99]

There are at least two major problems associated with this setup in relation to acquiring accurate measurements. Can anyone identify them?

Hint: There are some pretty strong hints included on the diagram

.99

[poynt99]

@ Harvey

I expect you now see some of the critical problems I've mentioned? And aside from using the correct probe types, do you see there is one simple addition to this setup that could provide a more accurate measurement of the battery voltage?

And that a slight change in the shunt probe positions (and rearrangement of the star ground) might (I stress "might") offer a better measurement on the shunt?

.99

[fuzzytomcat]

Hi everyone,

Here is TEST #10 .... it's a one (1) hour test with 40us and 2us readings taken every six (6) minutes for a total of eleven (11) readings or twenty two (22) Image and Data files for one (1) hour.

http://www.energeticforum.com/74594-post3133.html

Fuzzy

[poynt99]

Proposed Improvements - First Approach

Some improvements can be made, but clearly the limitations of using two single-ended probes is more than evident here.

SPICE confirmation of both the shunt and battery measurement changes show dramatic improvements.

.99