Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie

[jibbguy]

Listening to Milehigh is like enduring a broken record stuck on the grove playing "It will never work!" forever.. Like we were sent to Hell and that is our hideous punishment

Ad hominem nonsense aimed against those who actually DO STUFF won't change the data, Milehigh. You are just pissed off because you were proved WRONG countless times here, and no one listened to you in your "holy quest" to get this technology stamped out and to burn Rosemary at the stake for even suggesting that Maxwell may not have been entirely correct 150 years ago (...lol before the advent of even Atomic Theory).

Folks, look through this thread, and wonder for yourselves why a person would literally invest HUNDREDS of man hours posting negatively here day in and day out for months.. For free (and after being proved wrong over and over)? Is he doing it for pay? We will probably never know; because he refuses to tell us his name... And only attacks others behind his comfortable mask of internet anonymity.

Those that so love to attack others here, should go to this link and Search for the term "Zero Point Energy", and tell us why all the HUNDREDS of Peer-Reviewed Scientific Papers there discussing energy sources that HAVE NO CONNECTION to the Laws of Thermodynamics are "full of it" too

http://arxiv.org/

...the Los Alamos National Labs Physics Archives, hosted by Cornel University.. You know, those "nutty free energy kooks" .

You see, these subjects really are "mainstream" now... And the supreme primacy of the "Laws of Thermodynamics" in every case are DONE. Lol, they just "forgot" to tell the general public somehow

Knowing that, attacking these concepts on "general principal" sounds rather ignorant. And really, when we study all you have wrote, all the suppositions you put up against it that were proved WRONG over and over: That is what it is. You REALLY DON'T KNOW if the Ainslie Circuit works as claimed or not. You BELIEVE it doesn't and threw up whatever you could think of against it... An article of "faith" (which is fine in issues of Spirituality, but this is "Science"). Not very "scientific" of you, is it?

MY name is Steve Windisch. I am proud to be a very small part of one of the best documented and researched Open Source projects EVER regarding a free energy subject: The Rosemary Ainslie Circuit and Effect. Researchers like Aaron, Glen, Harvey, Michael, Ash, Andrew, Donovan, and Gotoluc (and Stefan for hosting us all), and dozens of other good folks here working on this and many other varied projects; are doing everyone on this planet the important service of objectively investigating controversial alternative energy technologies that our mainstream scientific community consistently REFUSES to do.

It is my pleasure to help report on the fine work of others, and to help ensure the world hears about it, a task i hope all of you out there will help with: Gaining public awareness through grass roots activism... Telling our family, friends, neighbors, and co-workers.. Writing letters to academia to urge them to knock down the stone wall they have erected around these "controversial" technologies that "coincidentally" happen to seriously compete with coal and oil, to honestly study them as they SHOULD HAVE YEARS AGO.

These threads are about GAINING SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE through Open Source research. Those who cannot see that, and insist on confusing "Honest Skepticism" (...which is valuable), with the Spanish Inquisition or book-burning rallies in 1933 Germany... should consider doing us all a favor and go provide "Skeptical Analysis" to the "Sprites, Leprechauns, and Meadow Dancing Lights" forums. Maybe you might get somewhere in convincing them to accept your own private brand of "reason", and stop what they are doing.

Because you and your cohorts have failed miserably here. 

The "Hundred Years' War" against energy heresy is now OVER. Those heretics and pariahs who refused to buckle under to peer intimidation and derision tactics meant to "keep us quiet" for fear of being bullied themselves, WON.... And you, Milehigh (or who ever or what ever you really are), and your "employers" (...the concept that Energy can only be obtained from the Temple Priests praying over the Properly Approved text books) ... LOST.

[MileHigh]

Jibbguy:

And you had a long career as a tech with the Navy or something like that?  All of your discussions about instrumentation?

For me there is a real disconnect between your background and what you say.  I am wrong wrong wrong.  It's just pure spinning.  The new Ainsley paper has no numbers and not a single test has shown anything.  The only real tests so far show under unity.

I am proud to be a very small part of one of the best documented and researched Open Source projects EVER regarding a free energy subject: The Rosemary Ainslie Circuit and Effect.

I don't know what planet you are on or what sea you are sailing but you have got to be kidding.  Are you really that disconnected from the real world?

These threads are about GAINING SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE through Open Source research.

With a paradigm shift in people's attitudes that just might happen.

The "Hundred Years' War" against energy heresy is now OVER. Those heretics and pariahs who refused to buckle under to peer intimidation and derision tactics meant to "keep us quiet" for fear of being bullied themselves, WON.... And you, Milehigh (or who ever or what ever you really are), and your "employers" (...the concept that Energy can only be obtained from the Temple Priests praying over the Properly Approved text books) ... LOST.

Charlton Heston vibe going there Jibbguy.  I have no "employers," I am just here for some fun.

All the drama, I have "LOST"

There is nothing going with the Ainsley circuit Jubbguy and the paper will never get approved in a million years.  The whole experience was a fun crazy roller-coaster ride but I jumped off a few months ago.

The circuit does NOT produce any extra heat.  One year from now the whole thing will have petered out and will be forgotten.

Remember the free energy "rock star couple" Imhotep and Sheeba?  All the excitement with modifying a computer fan and turning it into a compact Bedini motor?  The title of the thread on the EF was something like "Free energy at last step by step a most see."

Well, Jibbguy, the title of the thread was a complete lie and Imhotep and Sheeba never for a nanosecond demonstrated any kind of free energy at all.  And for all the "Cult of Imhotep" he hasn't done anything in the last year and he is forgotten.

In one year the "big project" will be dead.  It's not exactly an EMI-friendly way to make heat anyways, is it?  I don't think the FCC or UL would look too kindly upon a "magic heater" that produces no more heat than a conventional heater.

It's too bad because somebody with your background could really help people out.  Instead you are a cheerleader for stuff that's not real, seemingly you can't see.

When myself or Poynt99 look at a "remarkable" Pirate or Gadget clip we see nothing, because there is nothing.  What we also see is that Pirate and Gadget are misunderstanding what they are looking at and jumping to grandiose conclusions.  In trying to point that out, instead of a debate you get bashed and trashed.

Almost everybody gets excited about pulsing inductors because they don't understand how they work.  They don't understand how the energy flows and are not open to discussion.

Check out where the Ainsley circuit is in Dec 2010.

MileHigh

[Rosemary Ainslie]

  Hello MileHigh

Back in attack mode?  I was determined to ignore your earlier one but can't seem to sit on hands while this attack persists.  I was heartened to see you concede that you're 'wrong wrong wong' and that it's pure spinning.  And that gaining scientific knowledge through open source will possibly happen with a required shift in paradigms.  But I'm constitutionally a plodder and I then realised you were being sarcastic.  I had a giddy hope for a wild and fleeting moment - that you'd reformed.

I trust that our paper will eventually get reviewed and published.  The circuit definitely produces extra heat.  And if you have 'jumped off' the roller coaster ride - it's not apparent - else why are you still posting?  I wish this thread would collapse under it's own weight of negative energy.

MileHigh there's a difference with this claim.  We're asking academics to check it out.  On the evidence available we have heat signatures that do not conform to expected parameters.  But my actual question is why do you keep posting here.  Aaron, Harvey et al have given up on this thread.  I only lurk to keep reminding - what I'm sure is a dwindling reading public - that these type of posts are misleading and counterproductive.  And like Jibbs, I wonder why you persist?  It gains nothing.  And I think readership has dwindled to just the two of us

I'm glad Poynty concurs with you.  At least you're not entirely on your own.  Poynty's also frantically attempting to ignore the implications here.  But this new 'break through' is history now - reasonably and unequivocally proven on tests that are also available for inspection.  My own first claim could be questioned as our proof was not as available for public consumption as is Fuzzy's.  Now - to continue to deny the evidence with a burgeoning flush of replications - is, frankly, rather absurd. 

My own take is that you don't 'dare to hope'.  I can't believe that you're simply that negative.  And - for Goodness Sake - read up on Dark matter - dark energy.  It's possibly the 'theoretical' justification for this new energy source. 

And more to the point - when is that new blog going to get launched?  I keep hoping.

Rosie

[MileHigh]

Rosemary:

You're not the first and won't be the last to get excited over a pulsing inductor.

Aaron's "electronics talk" can be offensive sometimes.  It's just an insult to the profession.  So I posted.  Do you want to put a muzzle on me?

I am not being negative about your project, I am just being a realist and telling you the truth.

I don't see Glen generating any real data and summarizing it.  He is just spewing out DSO data grabs.  That is where there is such a disconnect and I don't see it getting any closer.  Generate some real power in vs. power out numbers and forget about ephemeral "heat signatures."

Forget about dark matter and simply generate some real data.

MileHigh

P.S.:  I was serious about a paradigm shift.

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Hi MileHigh.  Still there?  Not often we're sharing the same time frames.  Especially latterly.  I've been trying to get to bed at night which is an entire departure from the last three months.  The changes has shocked me into overdrive.  It's quite a buzz. 

No I don't want to muzzle you.  I'd hate to muzzle anyone.  And - as a rule - I actually enjoy what you have to say.  I just wish the exceptions didn't always prove that rule - is all.

I know it's probably taxing that Glen doesn't summarise.  But he's an experimental purist.  He leaves that for others.  And when they miss the point of his experiment then he guides them into it.  It's an exceptionally respectful and courteous way of presenting data and is conventionally preferred.  There are those readers who would be offended at being told what to see and what to deduce.  Personally I'm with you here.  I'd quite like a synopsis.  And when I can I provide it.  But it certainly isn't conventionally preferred or required.

And how can you tell me to forget about dark matter when that's my thesis?  Do you want to put a muzzle on me?  LOL

Tell me more about that new blog.  I hear nothing more from Poynty Poynt and - I've said it before - I miss you all in strange and perverse ways.  I think - bottom line - I'm a reformist or somesuch.  I live in hopes that you'll all become adventurous amateur physicists  - like me.



edit:  Rosie