Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie

[Hoppy]

Lighten up lads! Remember anyone can be anyone they wish on a forum and opinions are just opinions. I learnt this lesson when Aaron dumped me off the Energetic forum and I was not even rude, just pushing my point a bit hard and because it made Aaron annoyed, he prevented me from posting. I'm not crying over this, far from it. It has clearly shown unlike this forum, the Energetic forum is not a place for healthy debate between sceptics and believers of 'free energy'. Aaron has the right to dis anyone he chooses, as does Stephan and on a forum, explanations for taking such action is not mandatory. We are all free to believe what we wish and if some people decide to believe that EE principles are for whatever reason fundamentally flawed or the world is flat, then so be it.

We can all draw useful snippets of information from the various FE forums whatever our beliefs and we all learn from this and this can alter our opinions when we use this information in our own experiments. With regards to the Ainslie test results, even if they are rejected by academia, I'm sure that some of the AT will simply shrug this off by saying that its a plot to discredit the FE community.

Hoppy

[jibbguy]

Hehehe, keep it up Milehigh. You are proving my points for me

I would respectfully suggest to the Admin, that this forum thread now be CLOSED, so no one can go back and delete their old posts... So it stands as a "monument" to show what went on here.

That way folks can decide for themselves, without the "help" that people like Milehigh provide (or me for that matter, come to think of it lol), once the news about this circuit creates a higher level of Public Awareness and is viewed by several thousand more people (as it may soon be).

Frankly, the poor level of "skepticism" we have seen here has sometimes  been a bit of an embarrassment for the genre (.. but not always; there have been some excellent suggestions from others that were appreciated and heeded). We can't help that, we must work with what we are given. "Eric Krieg" (an ACTUAL Skeptic of free energy concepts, who operates the "Philadelphia Skeptics" page and others) must be squirming and swearing at the blows in prestige his Cause has taken here... Which is not his fault either. Worthy and fairly open-minded opponents are rare around here, and i truly respect him and his intellect, although we obviously disagree over nearly everything regarding this subject, lol.

But since neither of us are teenagers posting in gaming forums shouting "STFU!" when we lose, there are no flames and unsubstantiated claims thrown like mud to cover over the facts and obscure them.   

On the other hand, this person in question: Well.... Let's just say he doesn't deserve any "Christmas Bonus" this year, that's for sure

[Rosemary Ainslie]

The jury of scientific consensus is still deliberating on the existence of dark matter and dark energy. Much more data is required. Hoptoad

Hi again.  I kept thinking back to this post and finally re-read it and now I know what was bothering me.  Jury definitely reached consensus that dark matter is there.  It's visible through gravitational lensing and is seen to be concentrated at the centre of galaxies.  It's loosely described as a halo around the galaxies but looks more like an upside down plate.  And it's mathematically required to exceed visible mass in galaxies by a factor of 10.  There's also some evidence of isolated concentrations of this matter in space that is not directly related to galaxial mass.  I think it's described as 'clumping'.

So what I find really exciting is that our 21st Century has also ushered in a new  and heretofore unidentified force.  That's really extraordinary when you consider that all text books still only refer to 4 known forces.  And on the subject of text books - Michio Kaku states that ´every text book on the planet says that the universe is made out of atoms and sub atomic particles.  Well, all those text books are wrong'.  And he's an expert.

I'ts all really jolly interesting.

[MileHigh]

Gotoluc:

I don't know if you are reading here, but you said:

@Rosemary, I also just received the Five 650 Farad @ 2.7vdc Ultracapacitors. Connecting them in series will give me 130 Farad @ 13.5vdc. I Hopping to test these on your circuit while collecting the flyback of the resistor to see if they can more efficently store the resistor flyback energy then a lead acid battery. It should also make energy calculations much easier since we are dealing with capacitive values.

That actually scares the crap out of me because it could be so dangerous if it accidentally gets short-circuited.  Please take my advice to never under any circumstances discharge your caps with a screwdriver blade.

You may not realize this but five ultracaps in series could probably instantly melt your watchband before you could react and give you third degree burns.  A wire could literally explode in the form of super-hot vaporized metal if it was shorted across the ultracaps.  I am making intelligent guesses here.

I suggest that you always discharge your ultracaps with an appropriate resistor, even if it takes 20 minutes to do it.

And yes Alex (below) is absolutely right about adding a fuse and I feel so stoopid for forgetting to mention something so basic.

Jibbguy:

You are off in your own world.

MileHigh

[Groundloop]

@MileHigh,

I agree with that statement. The same goes for big lead acid batteries.
Never over charge and never short circuit ANY high current devices.

One way of protecting the operator is to use a fuse in series with the
battery capacitor. The battery capacitors should be mounted on a
metal buss bar(s) inside a plastic box. The box should have a fuse and
also a switch with a series resistor (big wattage) for discharging the
capacitors before handling them.

Alex.