Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie

Started by TinselKoala, June 16, 2009, 09:52:52 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 26 Guests are viewing this topic.

Yucca

Quote from: Cap-Z-ro on July 21, 2009, 08:24:17 PM
"nobody can suppress your ideals but yourself "

Ha, oddly enough my life is a testament to that.


I'm not so sure that TK wasn't dealing with a male moniker over there.

Among a group of males only a "female" could get by that long without showing something...after all, look how quickly they went at mylow.

Unless something concrete shows up this thread it just another road apple along the path to over unity.

Maybe that mean ol' Stefan will let her/him post over here.

I believe she/he may be only person banned from an internet site before posting a word.

Or could it be that the elusive circuit happened to be in the 'on' mode at the very moment she/he registered, and caused a malfunction at the junction ?

Regards...

You're probably right, it all seems quite Freudian. She seems to offer a bossom that some find irresistable. Of course I could be wrong here lol. :D Anyways, it's all harmless fun at the end of the day. Rock on capz!

Asymatrix

Quote from: Yucca on July 21, 2009, 07:32:13 PM
LOL capz, see what I mean, brick walls my friend, brick walls! (all in all they´re just an...other brick in the wall!)

Pray asymatrix provide a reference to this full birth certificare, in fact don´t bother because I couldn´t care less, never voted in my life. Politics... no just BollockTicks lol! I will do as I please like the birds in the trees, I can only recommend that you do the same.

I did. Obama provided the birth certificate, it was examined, protographed, the documents office was contacted, and it's legit. Factcheck.org is a neutral agency. The alarmist posts 'ol Cap seems fond of creating should not be taken as gospel simply because he thinks they should be.

TinselKoala

@jibbguy: 555 expert, eh? OK, take a look at Aaron's "diagram"--the picture of his circuit with labels at the front of his video. Do you see the 555 timer? Do you see that it is being powered with a 9 volt battery?
Do you see the series resistor in the positive battery lead?

Do you see the value of that resistor? I make it 2.1 or 2.7 kiloOhms.

And that , my dear friends, is the cause of the 555 timer and mosfet oscillations. The 555 is not getting enough voltage to make a nice pulse.
With that resistor out, the circuit is wellbehaved. I even literally set the breadboard ON FIRE with mosfet heat--and the mosfet still works fine.
With that resistor in, I can even get the Philips to lose trigger, and yes, there are some pretty weird waveforms there.

SO that is my tentative explanation for the Aaron oscillations--they are not mosfet-produced in the way that was suggested. They are made by that 555 circuit as it is starved for voltage.

Aaron can test this easily simply by removing that silly resistor and comparing the 555's signal at pin 3 before and after.


Now, for the bad news: I picked up a real score today. I got a DataPulse 101 pulse generator!! And it works!! 5 nanosecond rise time at 10 volts into 50 ohms. And it can make pulses in the tiny fractions of one percent duty cycles. And--when the mosfet sees a truly fine truly short pulse, a very interesting thing happens.

Of course, as I shorten the pulse, the ON part of the trace gets shorter and shorter but the inductive ring stays constant--it comes after the mosfet is off, so isn't affected by the length of the on time. But--when the pulse is so short that the mosfet turn on, the input current goes way down...but the inductive spike still is there. It looks like I can make the pulse so short that the input current almost totally goes away...but the inductive spike on the output is STILL THERE in all its glory.

Let this sink in, I'll try to put up a video but I'm pretty tired, might have to wait till tomorrow.

But a fast risetime short pulse is really interesting. This pulse generator makes the Interstate's pulses look really bad in comparison. And the performance (by traditional standards) of the circuit is better too.

poynt99

TK,

It's coupling from your new pulser through the G-D capacitance.

Take the MOSFET right out of there and put a 470p cap in series with the pulser to the coil. I'll bet you'll see the same thing.

.99
question everything, double check the facts, THEN decide your path...

Simple Cheap Low Power Oscillators V2.0
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=downloads;sa=view;down=248
Towards Realizing the TPU V1.4: http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=downloads;sa=view;down=217
Capacitor Energy Transfer Experiments V1.0: http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=downloads;sa=view;down=209

TinselKoala

Quote from: poynt99 on July 22, 2009, 01:06:55 AM
TK,

It's coupling from your new pulser through the G-D capacitance.

Take the MOSFET right out of there and put a 470p cap in series with the pulser to the coil. I'll bet you'll see the same thing.

.99

I'm sure you're right. It looks pretty dramatic, though, to sweep the pulse width and see the input current trace just sort of dry up and fade away, but that ring is still there on the load, just like the smile of a Cheshire cat.
I'll make a little vid, toss it in the ring, and I'm sure it will start another whole revolution in the FE community: TK proves free energy but is too stupid to see it.
I don't have any numbers yet, except that I'm staying at 2.4 kHz just to KISS.
Except for Aaron's little toy, that one is all over the place.

One thing more: I made a better load, using an ots inductor of 12 microH, with a series anti-sense extra winding of 10 turns of resistance wire. So it's a ferrite core, 9 ohms, something in the low tens of microH, and it fits in a test tube, and can handle 50 watts without smoking, and I put the 1n4007 right between its legs.
So the whole thing is in the test tube cushioned and "sealed" by loose cotton wadding.
But a preliminary run shows that it will heat at 3 or 4 percent duty cycle, and it approaches the equilibrium temps cited by Rosemary.
Right now I am doing a control, a DC heat profile at 500 milliamps, 4 volts...or two watts average power input to load, similar to "eyeballed" average input to Ainslie circuit when running.