Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie

[BEP]

I know you are watching in rapt fascination, like everyone else, in the hope that TK will make some fatally discrediting mistake, shrivel up, and die in embarrassment.

Hardly. As far as I'm concerned I just want to know the facts. This is why I read your posts, TK.

My current opinion on this circuit is most folks just humored her. Humoring these types is a good thing if you wish to walk away in good health and all body parts.

Most do that for me. I'm supposed to be the crackpot. When a crackpot labels someone a crackpot things are pretty severe.

[qiman]

Eliminate ringing of spike returning to battery by increasing gate resistance.

[TinselKoala]

Congratulations Aaron.

You finally figured out how to show a waveform on your scope. I see that some of my instruction has actually helped you.

Now, please remember to show or state
1)the Probe Coupling (Ac or DC)
2) the Probe Attenuation (probably 10x if it is an actual scope probe rather than some alligator clips and a scrap of wire)
3) the Horizontal timebase setting (sec/div) and the vertical amplifier setting (V/div)
4) the zero position (by grounding the channel and showing where the trace is).
Then we will be able to tell you what your frequency and voltages are. These basic things must be known in order properly to interpret a waveform.

By the way, I showed those same waveforms what, 4 weeks ago now?
You are a little behind.
And what's the bandwidth of your scope, and its fastest risetime?

And what do your waveforms actually show? They show that when the gate of the mosfet is NOT overdriven, the transistor switches more cleanly and with less distortion. Turn that pot down even more and the signal will get even cleaner. Use a different mosfet and ditto.

Perhaps you should add that as a chapter to your book. Since it is ancient wisdom.

Now, can you show your "random resonant aperiodic oscillations" in some coherent way, or is the above waveform the correct one to use in a proper Ainslie experiment??

If the above waveform IS the correct one, what was all that BS about random aperiodic parasitic Hartley oscillation, or whatever you wound up calling it?

If the above waveform is NOT the correct one, why did you bother to show it at all, since we've all seen it long before?

Is it just to show that your scope can indeed trigger on a waveform when you've finally figured out how to set it?


(BTW I've been meaning to ask you: Is your quantum theory compatible with zipon-antitruant theory? That is, could both your theory and Rosemary's be correct? Just wondering....)


But that's a good way to reduce energy loss in the ringing--you prevent the mosfet from passing that energy in the first place by reducing the drive. So it stays in the battery where it belongs, instead of being dissipated in the circuit's resistances during the ringdown.
Good Work!

[TinselKoala]

Preparing for actual (as opposed to pilot) heat profile experiments.

#1: Hotpoint calibration of "Bullitt1" Ainslie loadcell. Load and thermocouple encased in heatshrink, immersed in mineral oil, in test tube, in boiling water for 15 minutes. Water at 100 C, load TC indicates about 4 degrees low. Coldpoint calibration to follow.

#2: TK lab snapshot, preparing for testing. Be afraid, be very afraid.
Note load temp at HHH--this is over 120 degrees C. The Aaron clock does not produce short duty cycles, and at 40 percent or so the load heats very rapidly. So I will be going back to a known 3 percent from a pulse generator, unless the magic HF random resonant aperiodic oscillation is "LESS" effective than the normal square edged pulse.

[0c]

#2: TK lab snapshot, preparing for testing. Be afraid, be very afraid.

Doen't that penguin get a bit warm?

I wonder how much heat you'd get if you pumped a bit of Hendrix through that Ainslie circuit?