Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie

[powercat]

Hi TK
  in this video you can see his scope/ 52 seconds in
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nxsoze9CZ9E
it's the weekend and my megabytes very slow/ I didn't see the make of the scope
18 vids on aaronmurakami's Channel
http://www.youtube.com/user/aaronmurakami

cat

[TinselKoala]

Hi TK
  in this video you can see his scope/ 52 seconds in
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nxsoze9CZ9E
it's the weekend and my megabytes very slow/ I didn't see the make of the scope
18 vids on aaronmurakami's Channel
http://www.youtube.com/user/aaronmurakami

cat

Thanks. And groan. If I have to watch all those I'm quite sure that the tiny remaining portion of my brainbone will turn to reeking green mush and start running out my earholes.


And here's this, for whatever it's worth. Of course, I have no idea what I'm doing so this is clearly a fraud. But at least you can see the scope traces and someone is explaining what you are seeing.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EeIVSiEZDnc

(And I know I multiplied when I should have divided by the value of the shunt resistor when I was talking about the actual VALUE of the instantaneous power trace. This has nothing to do with the principle illustrated here. But I'm sure I will hear about it.)

EDIT: I just found one that might be more up Aaron's alley. What is said applies to analog scopes as well.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wFc1ev-uJ1A

[qiman]

TK,

Everyone knows you're conducting phony tests and don't have the honesty to show power in and power out measurements even though you have the equipment. You will see the gain and that will make you look bad for all the bogus information you are feeding everyone.

The shunt scope shot I show is as it appears. There is NO ringdown in that spike whatsoever. I zoomed in as much as possible, tuned the resistance to the bare minimum necessary to eliminate the ring, zoomed out and took the picture. If you want to see the ring being eliminated, I can show you that since you can't figure it out for yourself. I already posted that with no resistance at the gate, there is a ring, increasing the resistance at the gate 100% eliminates the ring that is visible at the shunt in the negative spike going back to the battery.

Stop showing phony results with flat-lining on your scope with oscillation and other clowning around. You're already lost your reputation with quite a few people already and if you keep up your dog and pony show, there will be more.

I already have the results and am waiting for you to post more nonsense so I can reveal your games. In the end, the truth always wins and it was won before you ever got started.

[newbie123]

I already have the results and am waiting for you to post more nonsense so I can reveal your games. In the end, the truth always wins and it was won before you ever got started.

Instead of playing games why don't you just  post your  results;  and save us the agony of having to listen you two smart guys bicker...

[TinselKoala]

Phony tests. When I have seen and reported time and again heating of the load similar to Ainslie's at similar input power levels as she reports, and at a genuine known 3 percent duty cycle. And when I report all pertinent values and settings so that anyone can repeat my results to SEE FOR THEMSELVES whether what I report is phony or not.

Sure, if you want to say that's fake, fine. You are really a one-man comedy of error, ERRon.

And once again we have lies and innuendo and no real information from qiman.

Zoomed in, zoomed out, no info on scope settings. Garbage in, garbage out, is what I say.

You can see a complete energy measurement made with the Holy Digital God of Oscilloscopes if you just shut up and watch my videos. Of course since it involves actual numbers you won't be able to grok its fullness.

I even show energy being returned to the battery in the latest one. Which is uploading now.

Of course, we know from qiman that my measurements must be fake. Even though I report them in sufficient detail for anyone to check them.

Unlike some others I could mention.

Waiting is!