Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of this Forum, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above
Thanks to ALL for your help!!


Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie

Started by TinselKoala, June 16, 2009, 09:52:52 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 29 Guests are viewing this topic.

TinselKoala

Quote from: WilbyInebriated on July 07, 2009, 07:30:23 PM
you  tested this one?i didn't think so. that's how your "science" flys.

the real issue is, you never did it properly, and have been avoiding that fact with all sorts of asinine reasons. i didn't promise anything, but nice try on the misdirection again. let us know when you test that hypothesis...

How could I test that hypothesis, since I just made it today and I don't have the parts? That's why it's a hypothesis, not a demonstrated fact. And I could swear I see "future experimentation" there in that post you quote. Of course I could just be making that part up too...

"send me your address and i will send you the part, you worthless bum"

Yeah, that's not a promise, it's a threat.


WilbyInebriated

Quote from: TinselKoala on July 07, 2009, 07:55:58 PM
How could I test that hypothesis, since I just made it today and I don't have the parts? That's why it's a hypothesis, not a demonstrated fact.

"send me your address and i will send you the part, you worthless bum"

Yeah, that's not a promise, it's a threat.
you never did your "replication" properly, and are still avoiding that fact with asinine responses. as far as you testing your "hypothesis for future research", i think that's what you labeled it? correct me if i'm wrong counselor. i doubt that will ever happen, even though it's what you should have done first, but that's what you call "science"...   ::)

nice misdirection attempt, again.
There is no news. There's the truth of the signal. What I see. And, there's the puppet theater...
the Parliament jesters foist on the somnambulant public.  - Mr. Universe

TinselKoala

Quote from: WilbyInebriated on July 07, 2009, 07:59:04 PM
you never did the replication properly. as far as you testing your "hypothesis for future research", i think that's what you labeled it? correct me if i'm wrong counselor. i doubt that will ever happen, even though it's what you should have done first, but that's what you call "science"...

nice misdirection attempt, again.

You are starting to sound really weak there.  You're grasping at straw men now--attacking research that I haven't even done yet and just proposed this morning. Yet you already know how I'm going to do it and how it will turn out. Sad. Maybe you should take a break, go get a milkshake if you're old enough to go to the store by yourself.


By the way, your heroine has moved the goalposts yet again. If you compare her present description of the "control" test--which she now says depleted the batteries--with the report of the control test in the EIT paper, you will see that she doesn't even seem to understand what she herself is reporting. The batteries in the control test are nowhere near depleted, if you can trust her figures at all at any time. Take a look for yourself and see.

Now, once again, why are you attacking me, Wilby, when Ainslie is so much a better target? Is it because I will play and she won't? Well, I'm getting tired and I hear Mom calling, so I better go home, it's almost dark.

WilbyInebriated

Quote from: TinselKoala on July 07, 2009, 08:11:40 PM
You are starting to sound really weak there.  You're grasping at straw men now--attacking research that I haven't even done yet and just proposed this morning. Yet you already know how I'm going to do it and how it will turn out. Sad. Maybe you should take a break, go get a milkshake if you're old enough to go to the store by yourself.


By the way, your heroine has moved the goalposts yet again. If you compare her present description of the "control" test--which she now says depleted the batteries--with the report of the control test in the EIT paper, you will see that she doesn't even seem to understand what she herself is reporting. The batteries in the control test are nowhere near depleted, if you can trust her figures at all at any time. Take a look for yourself and see.

Now, once again, why are you attacking me, Wilby, when Ainslie is so much a better target? Is it because I will play and she won't? Well, I'm getting tired and I hear Mom calling, so I better go home, it's almost dark.

ok, bye now. say hi to mom for me. let us know if you do get around to testing the "future research" hypothesis. i'll grab a chair, i'm sure it will be classic.

i don't care what RMA is doing. we are talking about your circuit. the one that still doesn't have the specified fet. nice try on the misdirection though. you do that every time, such stamina...
There is no news. There's the truth of the signal. What I see. And, there's the puppet theater...
the Parliament jesters foist on the somnambulant public.  - Mr. Universe

TinselKoala

"send me your address and i will send you the part, you worthless bum"

Oh, I just remembered:

Here's a good way to tell if someone is feeding you science, or bullshit. Is their claimed result repeatable, by anyone, at any time?

Mine is.

Hers isn't.

And yours--well, we just don't know, do we.