Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie

[TinselKoala]

i've told you several times now. do it right, for the love of zeus.
you and i are not talking about RA, we are talking about your bad scientific method. i got heathens aplenty right here...

That is it. Goodbye. You get the last word. Enjoy playing with yourself.

[Paul-R]

If you look at energeticforum.com , Rosemary said that the Fet is not a critical part
http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/4314-cop-17-heater-rosemary-ainslie-8.html#post59195

Also, Tinselkoala appears to have been slung off that thread. Nice use
of red ink:
http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/4314-cop-17-heater-rosemary-ainslie-16.html

[henieck]

Hello TinselKoala (and others as well),

You seem to be very reasonable guy. I know you from the other forum and I am happy I have found you here because I would like to ask you a question. You are well seasoned member of wide interest of this community while I am just a fresh one, and my little request to you is if you could express what is your perspective on “free energy” field in terms of what seems to be bull s. or what has been successfully replicated by some people. So far I have proved just to myself that Rosemary’s circuit is a joke. I hope others will be able to make it working â€" but I really doubt it.

The worst is that years later there will be people who will be trying out this stupid circuit and be puzzled by the surface effect of the flyback loop â€" what a waste of time. So after my first encounter in this field it seems to me that designer is uneducated- but made a virtue from this fact and reframed it into open-mind-ness, emotional about the outcome, childish about criticism, not capable of objective, down to the point thinking, not being able to detect her own errors in judgments and trace her own mind deceit. I was shocked to discover that the “inventor” did not know basic operational facts about electric current, energy or even her very simple circuit.

This woman was not even aware of the fact that it takes energy to make magnetic field exist, and that a coil can store some energy in the form of magnetic field, until it is disconnected form the current! This is just most shocking of all. The woman who was gong to energetically save the world had no most basic understanding about energy. It wasn’t somebody who knew it, saw a flaw in it and proposed different, better theoryâ€" it was somebody who had an amazing informational “hole” in this region and in few others (the battery example). There was no model about this piece of reality in her mind at allâ€" so instead of getting educated she was forced to make a new zipon theory.

Even when I pointed out how energy is stored in a coil - nothing helped, like there was total blockage for any new input. Just her littlie world of sick hallucinations and zero capability to processing any new information â€" just deletion. She had no other choice - she had to delete all the contradictory information because otherwise she would be forced to rebuild her entire pitiful world and all the past experiences about this circuit. Infinitely pitiful. I didn’t want to put new convictions through throat â€" I just wanted her to process new information somehow. She must have had sensed, that asking questions expose to herself her inconsistencies â€" so she insisted on deletion of those who asked inconvenient questions.

Some other users of forum disappointed equally â€" evidently they want to live in entirely other semi scientific, semi religious world and don’t want to be disturbed by any sober, they call “debunkers”. I think that first of all she was trying to debunk widely accepted point of view â€" and the fact that they call me debunker confirms that they had readily swallowed her infantile, yet complicated zipon theory like Lindemann swallowed gravity wheel idea. Seeing this great “nothingness” compared to her great claims I have to admit I have got carried away a bit â€" so they blocked me entirely that I can’t even read what is next there. Does it happen very often here as well?

Scientifically, playing with this idiotic circuit for few days was a pure waste of time, although one learns all the time something new. Conversely, from psychological point of view â€" it was fascinating to have first hand experience in this field how psychology of one such “inventor” really operates. Priceless experience â€" and I am wondering â€" do you think that other pseudo-scientific “inventors” in this field are equally contaminated by this sort of psychological problems as well? But most of all, like I wrote above â€" I would love to hear your opinion about other things potentially worth of at least looking at. Are there any preliminarily promising things in this “free energy” field? I consider this Rosemary’s idiotic thing finished for me and need new inspiration. What is yours now?

Best regards, henieck.

[ramset]

Quote from All Canadian

I would like to make a point about skeptics, skepticism to a point can be a healthy thing but you should understand where this path leads.Take a look at this website and read the posts for a while and you will get the picture.---http://forums.randi.org/
These guys must be the most self rightious, egostical bafoons I have ever had the displeasure of talking with. They are hard core skeptics who believe reason and logic must dictate everything as such they cannot imagine how "there" logic could be flawed in any way,so they continually degrade and humiliate each other. In essence there logic concludes that 99.99% of the people on this planet are misguided, delusional or stupid relative to them. But there logic has a flaw, the individual, there logic cannot explain the wright brothers airplane, goddards rockets or Teslas alternating current. Because at that time all these technologies were "unproven" to the skeptics the key word being "unproven", the skeptic needs concrete proof before he will believe anything as such he believes almost nothing which is why I have yet to hear of any true skeptic accomplish anything that could be regarded as beneficial to society in any way.
I usually simply ignore the skeptics as they have absolutely nothing to offer me in the way of understanding, they come to degrade and humiliate to make themselves feel superior----that is there nature.

BTW  TK is NOT a skeptic  ,
He is a scientist/experimenter with a very good bullshit meter

Chet 

[Asymatrix]

Perhaps Rosemary is Mylow's cousin...