Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie

[TinselKoala]

This is all so damaging for the OU community. OU exist, in theory, but probably even the inventor makes her tea with a normal water heater from the store, using 1000W+.

Why not settle this in a simple contest.
- An impartial jury determines the capacity of standard big-brand batteries.
- Contestents get to boil a substantial amount of water off said batteries. Standardized water container, hang heating elements over the side.
- (S)he who gets the most water boiled with the least battery capacity, wins.

I'll be impressed when someone makes us all a good cup of tea from one AA battery.
Duty cycles, voltage readings, coils, loops, etc, it says so little. Take a fresh battery from the supermarket, hook it to your circuit, and boil some water.

Yep, you are of course talking about basic calorimetry, long known to be the "right" way to test any OU claim. But good calorimetry has its own problems.

It's sad. Rosemary said she was having a cold winter. But I doubt if she's warming her hands over an Ainslie heater.

[TinselKoala]

When people are insecure in their assertions then they will not allow their mind to entertain logical thoughts that contradict their beliefs, in effect their minds are closed in order to protect the ego boosting charade that allows them to feel bigger.

It is so simple, if you scope the drain of an N channel FET, as specified in Ainslees papers then you WILL observe this:

When the FET switches OFF then Rload pulls the probe UP to the positive rail.

When the FET switches ON then the low Rds (relative to Rload) will pull the probe DOWN to ground.

It´s an inverted version of the gate signal. And you can´t ever switch an inductive load by placing it between ground and source, to get correct duty cycle readings, because backspikes will kill the FET. Anyone who has any experience with N channel FETs knows this, you can only scope inverted, interestingly many forget this because they´re interested in inductive backspikes which appear positive and are much taller (of course they are really neg).

This coupled with the fact that the specified 555 circuit gives 97% on duty tells us that this whole COP17 heater idea is just so much poppycock! Anyone who "believes" and argues against these facts is (in my opinion) a complete moron!

Thass wot i says too, mon.

Last week, iirc.

[TinselKoala]

Aaron, you are doing it again. Since I am being censored by you, through the use of prior restraint, I cannot respond directly to the slanders you are slinging.
Here are a couple links for you, since you seem to be "definitionally challenged" in addition to being scientifically so.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prior_restraint
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Censorship

And if you think about it for more than an instant, you will realise that the mosfet duty cycle issue is at the heart of the energy calculations in the paper that Rosemary has repeatedly asked someone, anyone, to examine and criticize. Oh, no, that's what a scientist would do. What she actually asked for is that someone, anyone, PROVE her paper to be correct. Well, I have shown that there are so many holes in the paper that it is unlikely to be correct. When the holes are plugged, and only then, can the real claim even begin to be examined. If it survives that long. And it doesn't look good at this point.

How's that Ohmite resistor working for you? What's its inductance?

p.s.
For the real truth seekers and you know who you are - lets not forget that at a 95% duty cycle, you can still get gains. Please stay focused on the topic and the truth will prevail."

You know, I think I'm finally getting through. It sounds almost like you are acknowledging finally what I've been telling you for over a week, in increasingly simpler and simpler terms. I'm glad I finally reached a level that you could understand, when I moved to the living room floor to show you how YOUR circuit behaves. Thank you.

Now, perhaps we can get on to testing the "gains" issue. Because it's wrong as well, and when your mind clears up we can start examining why.

Hint: Calculus helps. It actually is good for something.

[HeairBear]

Yep, you are of course talking about basic calorimetry, long known to be the "right" way to test any OU claim.

LOL, where do you get this stuff? Is that penguin pecking at your brain when your not looking? When your mouth is closed, it keeps feet from entering.

[TinselKoala]

LOL, where do you get this stuff? Is that penguin pecking at your brain when your not looking? When your mouth is closed, it keeps feet from entering.

Perhaps you would care to elaborate on just how my statement is in error.

Oh, and I sure would like to see some of your work, so I know what kind of troll I'm dealing with.