Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie

[TinselKoala]

And for goodness sakes, when will it sink in that
I HAVE GOTTEN LOAD HEATING SIMILAR TO AINSLIE'S
using a known 3 percent ON duty cycle,
AT AVERAGE POWER LEVELS IN LINE WITH AINSLIE'S
reported input power levels in her papers.

Sorry to shout but doesn't this deserve to be said out loud?

That is, I feel that I have replicated Ainslie's EXPERIMENTAL results to a fair degree of accuracy at the duty cycle originally claimed, using not the erroneous 555 timer that makes the inverted cycle from the Quantum paper, but rather a fast risetime (5 ns) pulse generator set at 2.4 kHz and 3 percent KNOWN  ON duty cycle.

There is no problem there.

The problem is with Ainslie's CONTROL run and her calculations of the energy balance.

So far, my control runs, using the same load, powered by a DC regulated power supply set to deliver the appropriate DC current to give the same average INPUT power to the load...these cause the load to heat somewhat faster and to reach a somewhat higher temperature at equilibrium.

Now, if someone can tell me how the mosfet oscillation or non-oscillation can possibly affect these results in a pro-OU direction...I would really appreciate it.

[newbie123]

And I keep my personal identity private because nobody gives a flying flmp who I am anyway, and I like it that way. I'm not trying to promote a book or sell anybody anything. If people want to use their "real" names on the internet, that's their business. If they don't, that's OK too, and probably, IMHO, a whole lot smarter.

Remember the MyLow fiasco? I got death threats over that one, and I was right on the whole time.

TK, 

Seems like some people here (and more so on other forums) would rather perpetuate fantasy (and speculation) rather than pursue  the truth (aka science),  but I think you're doing a pretty good job and more scientific than most.

[TinselKoala]

Thanks.
I'm not averse to a little fantasy now and then myself, as you can probably guess. And I don't mind taking flack for what I've done with my education, because that's my responsibility.
But when someone tries to diss my education itself, that's when I start to burn up. I've slept through classes in 5 of the finest universities in the English-speaking world, flunked out hard from one, and was able to get back in, pull myself out of the gutter and get almost as far as the curb. Ahh, those were the days, wine and roses, buds and honeys. Anyway, I've had the opportunity to learn from the finest, and much of what I was taught actually seems to hold up under inspection. The rest I must take on (informed and considered) faith. When we landed that robot on Titan, that sort of told me that we pretty much must know what is what, as far as kinematics goes--along with all the other physics involved as well. Some pretty darn good shooting, that.
So I'm extremely skeptical of speculation that attempts to disguise itself as theory, and I'm reactionary when it comes to the philosophy of experimental science. The issues at stake in the present case are not to do with the COP>17 claim, which is ridiculous on the face of it (that is, it has little or no "face validity", a technical term) and is easily dismissed by the most rudimentary experimentation.
They have rather to do with confirmatory bias in research design, the philosophy of science, the psychology of experimenters, and even the psychopathology of everyday life, to borrow a famous title from Uncle Siggy.
Certainly the interpersonal byplay has revealed much more true and interesting detail than has the exploration --yet again-- of an ancient circuit and an ancient idea for the production of energy.

[jibbguy]

TK, Don't take it personally. You're not the one that asked for a photo , are you? Everything is not about you, you know

(geez an old girl friend said that to me once years ago lol)

Imo, you are entitled to your anonymity, UP UNTIL you make personal and scurrilous claims about an opponent's honesty or honor who IS NOT anonymous. Then it's time to either bite the bullet and come forward out of the dark... Or shut the hell up. Because otherwise you can expect no respect or consideration for your opinions... You have then become a meaningless gadfly, or a shill. And neither are worth listening to.   

I always use my internet name, but have published articles under my own and have often linked to them here and other places so it's no secret (it's "Steve Windisch"). That is fine but i draw the line at a photo There is no reason for anyone to have a friggin' photo. I've made so many enemies in the past (mainly from my political days, usually neo-cons who are not interested in real debate only personal attack, and so got utterly ego-crushed via Karma, using their own tactics back at them lol), that i don't need to be recognized by some half-witted fascist with inadequacy syndrome and an old "Bush-Cheney" bumper sticker. Such fisticuffs might even be extremely fun and satisfying, but they are illegal and prone to get you sued when you win, lol.

As for all this here in the thread: We shall eventually see one way or another, as it NOW is receiving more of the interest due to it  

THAT IS MY POINT IN A NUTSHELL.

And why some others' here don't want to see it pursued (..Not referring to you, lol), is really rather strange when you think about it.

[0c]

And why some others' here don't want to see it pursued (..Not referring to you, lol), is really rather strange when you think about it.

I'm not saying it shouldn't be pursued. I'm saying TK has done more than enough. I'm satisfied there is no OU to be had with the circuits presented so far. If Rosemary, Aaron, FuzzyTomCat, Jetijs, AllCanadian, et al. want to carry on, more power to them. When they can present some unambiguous evidence they have achieved what Rosemary's circuits fail to, let them present their case. Oh yeah, don't forget Wilby.    If it interests him enough, I'm sure TK would step up to the plate.

And I have requested this be properly put to bed. A lot of work has been done, it should be prepared as if it was to be submitted for peer review. I don't think it should be dropped and forgotten. It might even be a good idea, as TK suggested, to submit it to a journal for publication.

There are other mysteries out there, begging for some attention (including a couple of mine  ). I think we would all be better served if TK applied some of his energy and talent to those. This one has been solved.