Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie

[Gauss]

Note how Aaron starts talking about BATTERY VOLTAGES INSTEAD OF MEASURING TRUE HEATING INPUT/OUTPUT...

This is part of their ever repeating plans, always include a battery power source to confuse all results and prolong the thread, after 3-6 months they always drop their thread and move on to the next one(see at Energetic: Plasma spark, Electric motors, Gray tube, Bedini SG, Stan Meyer etc, etc).

It´s useless trying to fight a club of people with a record history of non-achievement during 30+ years. Note also they have endless time filling up threads with 1000s of messages here and on Energetic.....

Here is the deal about the battery,  a trillion people have reported increasing voltages if you pulse an old or even new battery, my company also offers a battery pulsing device to increase the battery lifespan by about 2-3 times in a car, this is a fact and no news. There are loads of suppliers out there for this equipment.

So Aaron now mixes up the subject discussing rising battery voltages instead of measuring heating COP. Hence their rhetorics will last a little longer. Anyone understands how a guy can even PRINT so many words in such a short time period without cloning himself.....

And TK, thanks again for your hard work lowerring your brainpower to this level, just continue killing them off by professional engineering work. You are actually making them show who they are, over and over again, brilliant.

AND I STILL HAVE NO PROOF THAT RM EXISTS!

Eagerly awaiting at least another 100 LONG replies from the club of people with endless time on their hands..... 

[jibbguy]

How's WITTS and "Sir Timothy" Thrapp coming along, Gauss ?

For those that didn't see that, Gauss was their "unofficial spokesman" in the other forum on that subject. When it did not receive the attention he desired, he made it his mission to attack Aaron and Peter in any way he could. Peter's only "crime" was being around long enough to refute with personal knowledge many of the claims Thrapp makes. 

BTW, We are still waiting to see our open sourced device from WITTS.

Could this little bit of hatred here on this subject be revenge from being questioned at Energetics forum about the absurd statements and claims of WITTS?

Lol you should understand that few here are going to be listening to you about how WITTS  invented every major F-E technology for the last 200 years either. If you want to despise everyone who disagrees with you on this subject, be prepared for a lot of spilkus.

And how dare you denigrate the work of the fine people who made great contributions to those topics you mentioned. Their worth & value to this community is not in question.... Nor are the topics themselves.

However, i think it is right to question why the most "questionable" group of all regarding wild claims, WITTS, is being pushed on one hand, and then legitimate, effective, and prolific Open Source researchers attacked on the other... What are you really about, Gauss?   

BTW: "Sir Timothy" uses batteries with many of "his" devices too... Is it OK in his case?

And for the record, true pulsing commercial battery chargers for large lead-acids are not that common, nor "old" as far as being marketed goes. If it was, we would see slightly better results posted for conventional alternative energy systems (wind, solar); which our brothers on the accepted alternative energy side have not fully embraced yet. Although some chargers have had much "ripple" for many years (because they were not using filter caps after the bridge); it will not give the same effects at all as fast rise-time pulses; in both charging and desulfating.  Little coil flybacks for little batteries are not the same thing either. It appears the key to making that technology effective is carefully monitoring the pulse's amplitude and width for the best results and longevity of the battery; and doing so is not as easy as it looks. 

But you should know that already, since Sir Timothy and WITTS undoubtedly invented pulsing battery chargers too

[Gauss]

Thanks Aaron Jr(or whoever is your boss;)...

That was a truly brilliant message and piece of manouverring from you to yet again avoid answerring whether your "RM" is for real.... Well we both know the truth and you have a job to do here.

And you excluded me from Energetic when my questions became too embarassing and you lost it during the Witts thread and Peter admitted he did not write his own messages on the forum.. Plain as day always.

Then you guys never dared checking out Witts tech to verify it - how does that look... Why do you call RM "Witsend"?....

The super bankers(BIG BOSSES) said 2 years ago real FE must now be presented, the bees are dieing off(with them we go too), HOW WILL THAT AFFECT YOU?

How's WITTS and "Sir Timothy" Thrapp coming along, Gauss ?

For those that didn't see that, Gauss was their "unofficial spokesman" in the other forum on that subject. When it did not receive the attention he desired, he made it his mission to attack Aaron and Peter in any way he could. Peter's only "crime" was being around long enough to refute with personal knowledge many of the claims Thrapp makes. 

BTW, We are still waiting to see our open sourced device from WITTS.

Could this little bit of hatred here on this subject be revenge from being questioned at Energetics forum about the absurd statements and claims of WITTS?

Lol you should understand that few here are going to be listening to you about how WITTS  invented every major F-E technology for the last 200 years either. If you want to despise everyone who disagrees with you on this subject, be prepared for a lot of spilkus.

And how dare you denigrate the work of the fine people who made great contributions to those topics you mentioned. Their worth & value to this community is not in question.... Nor are the topics themselves.

However, i think it is right to question why the most "questionable" group of all regarding wild claims, WITTS, is being pushed on one hand, and then legitimate, effective, and prolific Open Source researchers attacked on the other... What are you really about, Gauss?   

BTW: "Sir Timothy" uses batteries with many of "his" devices too... Is it OK in his case?

And for the record, true pulsing commercial battery chargers for large lead-acids are not that common, nor "old" as far as being marketed goes. If it was, we would see slightly better results posted for conventional alternative energy systems (wind, solar); which our brothers on the accepted alternative energy side have not fully embraced yet. Although some chargers have had much "ripple" for many years (because they were not using filter caps after the bridge); it will not give the same effects at all as fast rise-time pulses; in both charging and desulfating.  Little coil flybacks for little batteries are not the same thing either. It appears the key to making that technology effective is carefully monitoring the pulse's amplitude and width for the best results and longevity of the battery; and doing so is not as easy as it looks. 

But you should know that already, since Sir Timothy and WITTS undoubtedly invented pulsing battery chargers too

[0c]

FYI: It looks like Rosemary has had a change of heart. She is now offering to help TK.


http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/4314-cop-17-heater-rosemary-ainslie-40.html#post62227

[jibbguy]

Frankly Gauss, the suggestion that someone else is replying in Peter's name on the forum is so ridiculous it doesn't require, or deserve, any reply.

I am just an observer & Member there, same as here... Lol my only "boss" as far as these subjects are concerned, is "the betterment of Humankind" . Which means i am doing what i feel is right.

But if you were excluded from there it is because you deserved it... And it had nothing to do with your earlier posts & opinions about WITTS; it was because of how you took the replies that contradicted them personally and what lengths you took to get "revenge" for them.

Regarding checking out WITTS, i am sure that if the request & suggestion to submit JUST ONE of their "Hundreds" of F-E  technologies for Open Source study was followed; then it would be taken seriously and studied, even now. Why WITTS & Thrapp are NOT being taken seriously currently, is the requirement of "donation" to get anything from them at all, other than outrageous claims of a 200 year old secret society, and how every major F-E inventor including Tesla and Keeley, have "stolen" ideas from them. Most of these people, like Stanley Meyer, are conveniently DEAD, and since he and others cannot reply to these claims of "theft" for themselves, maybe someone should.

Here's something else to consider, just as a hypothetical:

If all these unbelievable stories are true about WITTS, and they have been the major force for F-E over the years and behind nearly everything... Then we have THEM to blame for it being still suppressed and not in the mainstream; with yet no significant body of solid proofs to stand by. That spells "failure" then decade after decade (no matter what wonderful techs they may have created), and not very deserving of our money.

But the idea around here lately is attack Open Source projects where no one is asking for any money... As it is the REAL DANGER to those who would suppress... Since the only effective weapon left then is to convince us to stop study on our own.