Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie

[utilitarian]

the point is tk lies, obfuscates, misdirects, has zero integrity and credibility, refuses to be accountable for his words... etc. ad infinitum, ad nauseam. even when it is spelled out in front of you in his own words you little sycophants look the other way.

tk's goal isn't to show ou, that's more than obvious. i can quote a post of his that shows his precise attitude towards these things if you wish, since you're too lazy to read and comprehend yourself.
and should someone actually show ou, tk will spend the rest of his life trying to show how it was faked. because he is not a skeptic, he is a BELIEVER.

So why are you so fixated on TK?  This thread is about the claimed OU circuit of Ainslie.  So, this circuit is either OU, or it is not OU.  And I think that if you are posting in this thread, you ought to have at least some interest as to which of these two possibilities is reality.  So if you think that the deviations that TK makes are critical, you can easily shut him up about it once and for all.  Make an OU circuit.  Or are you too lazy or too broke to do it?

[WilbyInebriated]

So why are you so fixated on TK?  This thread is about the claimed OU circuit of Ainslie.  So, this circuit is either OU, or it is not OU.  And I think that if you are posting in this thread, you ought to have at least some interest as to which of these two possibilities is reality.  So if you think that the deviations that TK makes are critical, you can easily shut him up about it once and for all.  Make an OU circuit.  Or are you too lazy or too broke to do it?

are you mental? i just answered that.
where have i ever said his deviations are what is stopping him from achieving OU? can you find that post and show it to the world please? no you can't, because it doesn't exist. POINT IN FACT, all you will ever find is me telling him that it's bad methodology to use 'whatever' instead of SPECIFIED components.

more BASELESS assumption and attempts at misdirection from the peanut gallery is all you have offered. typical.

[jibbguy]

Are you accusing me of being a liar too, now, MileHigh?

BE VERY CLEAR HERE. ARE YOU?

Lol why peeps like you think others will take your crap is beyond me.

[MileHigh]

Wilby,

I followed the link from last night and I agree with you that TK's comments before and after being able to compare the two physical MOSFET devices "conflict."  I am using quotations because he was speculating before he got his hands on the two devices and then later he could "compare" the two devices in real life and make further comments.  I am using quotations because you can only find out so much about a device in one day.  For all we know if you had an optimum gate drive setup for both MOSFETs the performance differences would be reduced.  And like I said about myself previously, I don't care so much about the choice of MOSFET if it appears to be doing its job properly.

So I acknowledge that TK made contradictory statements.  Now, let's MOVE ON.

You made a few good postings and now you are back in the gutter.  Lift yourself up and try to make some interesting comments about the issue at hand:  testing the Ainsley circuit to look for OU.

I have moved on.

MileHigh

[WilbyInebriated]

Wilby,

I followed the link from last night and I agree with you that TK's comments before and after being able to compare the two physical MOSFET devices "conflict."  I am using quotations because he was speculating before he got his hands on the two devices and then later he could "compare" the two devices in real life and make further comments.  I am using quotations because you can only find out so much about a device in one day.  For all we know if you had an optimum gate drive setup for both MOSFETs the performance differences would be reduced.  And like I said about myself previously, I don't care so much about the choice of MOSFET if it appears to be doing its job properly.

So I acknowledge that TK made contradictory statements.  Now, let's MOVE ON.

You made a few good postings and now you are back in the gutter.  Lift yourself up and try to make some interesting comments about the issue at hand:  testing the Ainsley circuit to look for OU.

I have moved on.

MileHigh

WOW, perhaps i misjudged you. of course that remains to be seen...

one little baby step of recognition doesn't quite pull you out of the hole you are mile deep in. recognizing his conflicting statements is just the first 'baby' step, if you have ANY integrity you must reconcile these 'conflicts' BEFORE moving on. you can't just sweep them under the rug as they are absolutely relevant to his credibility. capiche?

edit: it was such a cute speculation, don't you think? even more so when he 'tried' to give me shit about who knows more about fet substitution